Investgator
Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 33
I don't think he needs to be out of jail for ever
isn't it like a lot of other abductions/etc =sex and power?Speaking for myself, I don't feel like I do know the reasons he kidnapped and kept her. The obvious may be a big part of it, but I don't assume that, and I suspect there's more. Only long hours with a psychiatrist, if that were to ever happen, would tell us, IMO.
Poor kid. She just wants to fade into as normal a life as she can. People need to leave her the F alone. Not make her some sort of ghoulish "inspiration".
What do you mean 'weird' side'?Exactly. Even well meaning people are overstepping into a weird side with this. I have seen it here even.
Unfortunately these are the kind of cases where an attorney can make "a name for themselves". If they find any sort of crack that can get this case dismissed because of false evidence, coercion or any other thing like that, it can mean big money for them. I am not by any means saying this will definitely happen or that I agree with it, however, it happens. These high Profile cases also bring out private law firms offering to do the case Pro Bono, just to get their names out there.
What do you mean 'weird' side'?
Do they have to get permission to use her name or picture?Like making t-shorts about her. Ugh.
I don't personally care what label or diagnosis might be slapped onto him, or if one is at all. I was just referring to what was said in the article and going from there. I don't like speculating about what horrors may have befallen Jayme while in captivity, but I like to be part of a group convo. The article, and speculating about what kind of defense might be put forth, just offered a topic of conversation. I certainly didn't mean to imply that I thought his actions should be excused for any reason.
Exactly. Even well meaning people are overstepping into a weird side with this. I have seen it here even.
What do you mean 'weird' side'?
Yes. But, do they have to get permission to use her name, pictures, etc.?Inspirational apparel with her name, using her as a "icon" for whatever cause someone is pushing, making statements about the identity she should take on, being a spokesperson for whatever, her name with a hashtag#, etc.
Yes. But, do they have to get permission to use her name, pictures, etc.?
Honestly, I don't know. Is she a trademark brand? no. They probably don't. All my opinion.
I have a question. Your answers will be purely speculative, but given what we know about JP - the crime details, and his profile - how likely would you say this is his first crime? Would you be surprised to find out he'd either planned or carried out other crimes?
My feeling is he has not, given the murders of DC and JC, even though they were meticulously planned to eliminate evidence, it was still arrogant and risky.
Whereas someone who was only interested in the abduction of another, IMO, may not have taken such a risk. So many layers of violence.
I guess I am also wondering how others think the violent and reckless murders of the Closses, along with the obsessive/compulsive nature of the abduction, fit into the ASPD framework and/or the sadism framework that has been talked about in this thread.
Yes, they do. I just Googled it and these are being done with the family's permission. Proceeds to the Jayme Closs' Fund.Honestly, I don't know. Is she a trademark brand? no. They probably don't. All my opinion.
I was stating that it could be a lottery for the 2 DA's defending him. Yes, of course it is advertising if a private firm were to take his case, that's why they do it.Not only will it not definitely happen, there's not a chance in hell that it will, IMO. This isn't a question of whodunit. he had her, he confessed and the perp
No. I don't think these guys are hoping to win the lottery. They're advertising for their practices. "Oh, THAT defense attorney can strategize!!! He could find a way to get that guy off even though the guy confessed!!! Man. Too bad JP can't afford him. But I can afford him to represent my son in his burglary case!!! No one ever understood my poor son. This attorney can help him!"
I doubt that this is his first crime. But I'm sure its his first of this magnitude. His first murder and first kidnapping. But I certainly wouldn't be surprised if he has some experience at burglary.I have a question. Your answers will be purely speculative, but given what we know about JP - the crime details, and his profile - how likely would you say this is his first crime? Would you be surprised to find out he'd either planned or carried out other crimes?
My feeling is he has not, given the murders of DC and JC, even though they were meticulously planned to eliminate evidence, it was still arrogant and risky.
Whereas someone who was only interested in the abduction of another, IMO, may not have taken such a risk. So many layers of violence.
I guess I am also wondering how others think the violent and reckless murders of the C's, along with the obsessive/compulsive nature of the abduction, fit into the ASPD framework and/or the sadism framework that has been talked about in this thread.