CaringCitizen
advocate
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2010
- Messages
- 237
- Reaction score
- 0
First, some snipped points other theorists made on this thread (that I learned from or had already assimilated into my theory too); these are credited by name.
Chargers2010 noted:
"Summary of points leading to suspected theory:
1. LE states that this is an isolated incident and there is no stranger danger. This alone is huge and pretty states what they are thinking.
2. Children and teacher are allowed to return to school right away.
3. LE seems to be highly focused on one area for searching and its suggested source = cell phone pinging.
4. LE has been rather tight lipped in this case and has not been asking the public to look out for certain cars, suspect sketches, etc. Yes, they have been asking for video footage however".
Revampz noted:
"I have had quite a few theories....I have never thought it was premeditated until someone above mentioned maybe Kyron was hurt and "was going to tell" or the fear put into them that he might tell.....I had an aha moment......that would give motive....or if they thought he may have hurt a younger member of the family....therefore was told to go to parking lot and dont know the rest....."
Pufnstuf noted:
"I will say that I believe that it was premeditated. I believe every detail of that day was planned and mentally rehearsed".
EmmaPeel notes:
"Today my updated working theory connects these assumptions:
1) Kyron was specifically the target - this was a planned Kyron abduction.
2) Kyron knew the person he left school with
3) The person(s) knew Kyrons schedule
4) The person(s) were familiar with this particular school and the school schedule"
"6) LE believes this to be the case due to a credible lead
7) It involves someone(s) known to the family
8) It involves someone(s) known to the school"
"10) The community has an idea
11) The neighbors house has recently been searched
12) Kyrons brother only recently moved hours away (reason?)
13) Kyrons brother was away camping with his father
14) Kyron knows older kids - teens - through his brother"
I snipped out 5 and 9 from Emma's list because they are the only two variants that do not fit my theory's list.
--------NOW HERE IS MY THEORY----------
1. LE has a POI but not enough 'goods' right now to obtain a warrant
2. No warrant = no right to criminally search POI's vehicle or home yet
3. But LE has gotten to do a cursory 'approved by car/homeowner' type of search (with that person hoping they are not a POI but would have anticipated such cursory searching due to proximity)
4. 'Not enough goods' also equates to LE wanting to avoid making a potential POI suspicious and hence 'going out of their way' to make specific people relax as much as possible
5. Relaxing someone can be as simple as to say 'do things as normal'. This includes NOT ASKING people to change their online presence to a private status
6. POI determined by:
a) Intimate knowledge of the school, including its: property layout (in and out), rules & guidelines, processes, habits, schedule, & people
b) Intimate knowledge about the Science Fair and corresponding specific school schedule and processes for that day
c) Intimate knowledge of the victim
d) Intimate knowledge of the victim's schedule (school or otherwise) for the entire day
e) Freedom of own schedule: eg, no employmer or other types of commitments involving 'having to be somewhere at a certain time'
f) One or more additional attributes in the determination: alibi discrepancies or oddities; ping activity; interaction with social media; recent tensions amongst relevant parties; and motive.
That's my theory based on everything I know right now. Looking forward to seeing more facts come out so I can either reject or keep accepting this one, as the case moves forward. Poor Kyron - what a darling little boy.
Chargers2010 noted:
"Summary of points leading to suspected theory:
1. LE states that this is an isolated incident and there is no stranger danger. This alone is huge and pretty states what they are thinking.
2. Children and teacher are allowed to return to school right away.
3. LE seems to be highly focused on one area for searching and its suggested source = cell phone pinging.
4. LE has been rather tight lipped in this case and has not been asking the public to look out for certain cars, suspect sketches, etc. Yes, they have been asking for video footage however".
Revampz noted:
"I have had quite a few theories....I have never thought it was premeditated until someone above mentioned maybe Kyron was hurt and "was going to tell" or the fear put into them that he might tell.....I had an aha moment......that would give motive....or if they thought he may have hurt a younger member of the family....therefore was told to go to parking lot and dont know the rest....."
Pufnstuf noted:
"I will say that I believe that it was premeditated. I believe every detail of that day was planned and mentally rehearsed".
EmmaPeel notes:
"Today my updated working theory connects these assumptions:
1) Kyron was specifically the target - this was a planned Kyron abduction.
2) Kyron knew the person he left school with
3) The person(s) knew Kyrons schedule
4) The person(s) were familiar with this particular school and the school schedule"
"6) LE believes this to be the case due to a credible lead
7) It involves someone(s) known to the family
8) It involves someone(s) known to the school"
"10) The community has an idea
11) The neighbors house has recently been searched
12) Kyrons brother only recently moved hours away (reason?)
13) Kyrons brother was away camping with his father
14) Kyron knows older kids - teens - through his brother"
I snipped out 5 and 9 from Emma's list because they are the only two variants that do not fit my theory's list.
--------NOW HERE IS MY THEORY----------
1. LE has a POI but not enough 'goods' right now to obtain a warrant
2. No warrant = no right to criminally search POI's vehicle or home yet
3. But LE has gotten to do a cursory 'approved by car/homeowner' type of search (with that person hoping they are not a POI but would have anticipated such cursory searching due to proximity)
4. 'Not enough goods' also equates to LE wanting to avoid making a potential POI suspicious and hence 'going out of their way' to make specific people relax as much as possible
5. Relaxing someone can be as simple as to say 'do things as normal'. This includes NOT ASKING people to change their online presence to a private status
6. POI determined by:
a) Intimate knowledge of the school, including its: property layout (in and out), rules & guidelines, processes, habits, schedule, & people
b) Intimate knowledge about the Science Fair and corresponding specific school schedule and processes for that day
c) Intimate knowledge of the victim
d) Intimate knowledge of the victim's schedule (school or otherwise) for the entire day
e) Freedom of own schedule: eg, no employmer or other types of commitments involving 'having to be somewhere at a certain time'
f) One or more additional attributes in the determination: alibi discrepancies or oddities; ping activity; interaction with social media; recent tensions amongst relevant parties; and motive.
That's my theory based on everything I know right now. Looking forward to seeing more facts come out so I can either reject or keep accepting this one, as the case moves forward. Poor Kyron - what a darling little boy.