WTH Are Brad's Lawyers Up To Now????

[momto3kids]

I, too, am relieved.

So, Mom, tell us about the receipt!

The price is $21.89
The VIC discount aligns right under it.

It does state Tide Detergent PC 21.89 T
It states Vic Tide Detergent .90-T

Customer # NOT name on receipt.
Does NOT say DSC it is SC 3782 not 1554...I will check to see if this changes weekly.

I will scan my receipt once I eat to show you all the REAL one.

 

[jmflu]

As to Brad wearing a collared shirt only on the second HT trip... is it possible he noticed the scratch marks on his neck and put a collar on to hide them?

 

[SleuthyGal]

I predict a sudden run on Tide Detergent in the large new weird-shape bottle at HT!

 

[Anderson]

As to Brad wearing a collared shirt only on the second HT trip... is it possible he noticed the scratch marks on his neck and put a collar on to hide them?

It is possible, I suppose.

I think someone has already commented on this, but I can't help it. I find this statement amazing:

"The photos reveal that if any marks were present on 7/12/08 when Det. Daniels noted them, that they were so insignificant as to be entirely gone a mere five days later."

Oh, so they were insignificant scratches. :waitasec: Hello! They were still scratches, and I don't think that we've seen an explanation for them yet.

 

[Anderson]

I predict a sudden run on Tide Detergent in the large new weird-shape bottle at HT!

Yes, I actually think that Tide should be making some substantial donations to websleuths in exchange for the advertising!

 

[SleuthyGal]

It is possible, I suppose.

I think someone has already commented on this, but I can't help it. I find this statement amazing:

"The photos reveal that if any marks were present on 7/12/08 when Det. Daniels noted them, that they were so insignificant as to be entirely gone a mere five days later."

Oh, so they were insignificant scratches. :waitasec: Hello! They were still scratches, and I don't think that we've seen an explanation for them yet.

Oh I was hoping to get some discussion going on this topic! I made some comments about it HERE and further HERE.

 

[Star12]

Oh I was hoping to get some discussion going on this topic! I made some comments about it HERE and further HERE.

Sounds like a good line of questioning for trial, eh?

 

[raisincharlie]

Oh I was hoping to get some discussion going on this topic! I made some comments about it HERE and further HERE.

SG, LE had to have seen something to put it into an affidavit - no way are they going to risk having evidence (if found) thrown out because of an invented story. Furthermore - the warrant included photographs of Brad, might be rather interesting if he is charged and tried to find out what those photo's revealed - such as his arms and other areas. Since K & B didn't actually address anything else, perhaps the scratches on the neck were basically healed as they claim but others (if they exist) may not have been.

ETA - it still makes no sense why Brad boy didn't respond about them at the time.

 

[jumpstreet]

I see K & B did manage to tick off Chief Bazemore:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/3555616/

In a statement Tuesday afternoon, Bazemore said releasing details of an ongoing investigation could jeopardize the case – "something I'm sure no one wants to see happen," she said.
“Cary citizens know that if there is ever any chance that they are at risk, the Cary Police Department informs them and protects them," she said.

Yeah, K&B were definitely "calling out" the chief with this one:
"Unless she begins supporting her conclusions with evidence, there is no reason to blindly accept Chief Bazemore's naked assertion [ that it was not a random crime of some sort] as true"

The CPD's dilemma is that if they publicly clear BC (assuming they already know him to be innocent), is that it might put the real perp on 'higher alert'. Would be better to avoid that as long as possible, and let K&B "play their game" in the meantime.

{ I say as I duck my head.... }

 

[Anderson]

Oh I was hoping to get some discussion going on this topic! I made some comments about it HERE and further HERE.

"When the detective said he "advised that he noticed red marks/scratches on the back of Brad's neck," did he in fact say this OUT LOUD to Brad? Did he just make a comment and then there was no explanation (and now the lawyers spin is that Brad wasn't ASKED about them?) And K&B are trying to insinuate that the cops manufactured evidence that wasn't there? Oooohhh."

SG Quote above

Okay, I knew that someone had commented. I just saw the pictures and text. You know much more about how LE would have handled this, but I seriously doubt that they would have mentioned that he didn't comment on the scratches if they had not given him an opportunity to do so. I think that I can still see the scratches in the photos that they posted, although I will blow them up later. In any case, are Brad's lawyers really a reliable source for the photos? I guess it wouldn't look good for them to touch them up.

It is also mentioned in the article that RC just posted that the lawyers emphasize that BC "either didn't have any (scratches) or no one asked him about them". The lawyers are definitely trying to make it look like this is not important information. I think it is.

 

[mahmoo]

It is possible, I suppose.

I think someone has already commented on this, but I can't help it. I find this statement amazing:

"The photos reveal that if any marks were present on 7/12/08 when Det. Daniels noted them, that they were so insignificant as to be entirely gone a mere five days later."

Oh, so they were insignificant scratches. :waitasec: Hello! They were still scratches, and I don't think that we've seen an explanation for them yet.

Sometimes when my dog jumps up on my legs it leaves long, red, kinda swollen scratches down my legs........they're usually gone within 2 days tops and that's with no Neosporin.

 

[raisincharlie]

Yeah, K&B were definitely "calling out" the chief with this one:
"Unless she begins supporting her conclusions with evidence, there is no reason to blindly accept Chief Bazemore's naked assertion [ that it was not a random crime of some sort] as true"

The CPD's dilemma is that if they publicly clear BC (assuming they already know him to be innocent), is that it might put the real perp on 'higher alert'. Would be better to avoid that as long as possible, and let K&B "play their game" in the meantime.

{ I say as I duck my head.... }

Where are the search warrants for the real perp ? Just wondering, no need to duck.

I'd say K & B are costing him a whole heck of a lot of money, more than Nancy could have bled from him. Hope he is enjoying getting deeper in debt. :crazy:

 

[jumpstreet]

ETA - it still makes no sense why Brad boy didn't respond about them at the time.

Agreed. It also proves nothing to demonstrate that any scratches he did have were gone after 5 days. Who cares how "deep" they were, or what caused them... bottom line is they remain unexplained, and obvious enough to be noted by the LE officer on the day of disappearance (assuming we believe the LE officer, which seems a reasonable assumption).

 

[SleuthyGal]

SG, LE had to have seen something to put it into an affidavit - no way are they going to risk having evidence (if found) thrown out because of an invented story. Furthermore - the warrant included photographs of Brad, might be rather interesting if he is charged and tried to find out what those photo's revealed - such as his arms and other areas. Since K & B didn't actually address anything else, perhaps the scratches on the neck were basically healed as they claim but others (if they exist) may not have been.

ETA - it still makes no sense why Brad boy didn't respond about them at the time.

No it makes no sense why he didn't respond about that. And I do not believe that the CPD saw marks/scratches that weren't there. Nope not buying K&B's assertion on that.

 

[jumpstreet]

Where are the search warrants for the real perp ? Just wondering, no need to duck.

Agreed RC. This is the biggest impediment to buying any form of Theory B at this point for sure! [ Unless LE has absolutely zilch in the moment ] Your thought that the attorneys primary driver being 'spin' at this point, and doing (presumably in their minds what is the best way to defend their client) makes the most sense.

 

[Topsail Girl]

Sometimes when my dog jumps up on my legs it leaves long, red, kinda swollen scratches down my legs........they're usually gone within 2 days tops and that's with no Neosporin.

Same here - 3 days tops. I said earlier that 5 days after the detective(s) noticed them the pics were taken. Big deal...they could have healed. I don't buy the "he wasn't asked" story.

 

[Anderson]

Sometimes when my dog jumps up on my legs it leaves long, red, kinda swollen scratches down my legs........they're usually gone within 2 days tops and that's with no Neosporin.

You are so right. They can heal very quickly.

 

[Star12]

No it makes no sense why he didn't respond about that. And I do not believe that the CPD saw marks/scratches that weren't there. Nope not buying K&B's assertion on that.

And that comment will certainly endear K&B to the CPD, won't it? I just don't think it's smart to call the PD liars.

 

[raisincharlie]

Agreed RC. This is the biggest impediment to buying any form of Theory B at this point for sure! [ Unless LE has absolutely zilch in the moment ] Your thought that the attorneys primary driver being 'spin' at this point, and doing (presumably in their minds what is the best way to defend their client) makes the most sense.

Actually I view his attorney's as thieves if this guy is innocent. Charging him billable hours to prove he is innocent in the court of public opinion. Don't seem to recall that ever being a responsibility for a defense lawyer until the client is accused. They sure are putting in a lot of work for a guy they want to claim has no worries.

 

[Topsail Girl]

And that comment will certainly endear K&B to the CPD, won't it? I just don't think it's smart to call the PD liars.

:crazy: I don't call them Knothead and Bonehead for nothin' LOL :crazy: