Response to GPs Parents' 3rd Amended Complaint
Re this story, reporting is confused/confusing.
First: "In the complaint, filed on Nov. 30, the Laundrie family admitted they received a call from Brian Laundrie in the immediate aftermath of Gabby’s disappearance."
Seems jumbled to me, as L family did not/could not admit anything in the complaint as it is not their doc (but obvs. the L's could make admissions in the L's "Response" doc. filing).
Second: "In their response, the Laundries confirmed..."
The scribd entry at tail end of article does NOT show the Laundrie's "Response " but SB's "Response."*
Reporter or editor may have fumbled.
Or by zigging & zagging in & out of ten windows open on my tablet, maybe I've gotten wires crossed. If so, speak right up. Plz.![Smile :) :)]()
If anyone sees image/pdf of "Laundries' Response to Plaintiff's Third Amendment Complaint" I'd look forward to the link. TIA.
<modsnip - not an approved source>
@RANCH Thx for your post w link updating us re newly filed Response to the L's 3rd Amended Complaint.In their response, the Laundries again confirmed the communication but denied all other allegations of knowledge of the crime.![]()
Laundrie family denies knowledge of Gabby Petito’s murder in new court documents
The parents of Brian Laundrie and their former attorney have filed a response to a motion denying they had outright knowledge of the fact that a murder had taken place.www.kktv.com
Re this story, reporting is confused/confusing.
First: "In the complaint, filed on Nov. 30, the Laundrie family admitted they received a call from Brian Laundrie in the immediate aftermath of Gabby’s disappearance."
Seems jumbled to me, as L family did not/could not admit anything in the complaint as it is not their doc (but obvs. the L's could make admissions in the L's "Response" doc. filing).
Second: "In their response, the Laundries confirmed..."
The scribd entry at tail end of article does NOT show the Laundrie's "Response " but SB's "Response."*
Reporter or editor may have fumbled.
Or by zigging & zagging in & out of ten windows open on my tablet, maybe I've gotten wires crossed. If so, speak right up. Plz.
If anyone sees image/pdf of "Laundries' Response to Plaintiff's Third Amendment Complaint" I'd look forward to the link. TIA.
<modsnip - not an approved source>
Last edited by a moderator: