terrypla
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2021
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 164
Could it have been her phone?
GP had her phone and BL had his phone as seen in the bodycam.
Could it have been her phone?
It made it's way back to his home. lol.Local news interview at Carlton Reserve, searchers with dogs, 4 wheelers and drones searching for Brian. That is a massive size, wet, some swampy, sawgrass, old oak trees, mosquitoes. He indicated Brian drove his car to the park entrance Tue and it made its way back to his home. Items taken in evidence bags were for k9 scents.
I went by his parents house again today. There were quite a few more people there than yesterday. I am guessing because it is the weekend. There were also a few NPPD vehicles there which I did not see yesterday. There was a gathering of young, maybe early 20 something, people in the driveway across the street from the house. Maybe they know her? Who knows. I stayed parked there for about 30 minutes. Then I heard that they were searching the Carlton Preserve. I live close to there, so that makes me a little curious. I have a feeling law enforcement knows a lot more than they are telling the public.
Could someone explain to me why LE didn't question BL immediately after GP's mother reported her daughter as missing? I understand that LE wouldn't treat BL as a suspect, but wouldn't it make sense to question the one who was the last to have been with / seen the missing person?
…and when that person would refuse to even sit down for an interview, shouldn't that person automatically be considered a POI?
I'm woefully ignorant of US laws and I know they can vary wildly per state, but I am just wondering why this wouldn't be standard practice. Hope someone can explain
Can someone source the info about the parents believing that may be where BL is and telling LE that?
Fox has this one: Gabby Petito: Police searching for her fiancé, family says he's been missing for days: LIVE UPDATES (foxnews.com)Is there a site with live updates like there was yesterday with the ongoing commentary?
I'm so invested in this awful case, and want to keep up. But I'm a week behind in my work, and simply can't follow on the fast moving threads. Totally missed the entire #9 thread last night. I know the guy took off and is possibly in some wildlife reserve, and that poor Gabby has not been located, but that's about all. TIA.
Could someone explain to me why LE didn't question BL immediately after GP's mother reported her daughter as missing? I understand that LE wouldn't treat BL as a suspect, but wouldn't it make sense to question the one who was the last to have been with / seen the missing person?
…and when that person would refuse to even sit down for an interview, shouldn't that person automatically be considered a POI?
I'm woefully ignorant of US laws and I know they can vary wildly per state, but I am just wondering why this wouldn't be standard practice. Hope someone can explain
I don’t think it’s weird at all I was a preschool teacher and I said it to my son who’s 11
New member here doing my first post, although I've peeked into this site's postings for many years... Pardon me if someone asked this before, but every time that I blink, another 8-10 pages of posts fly by...
The latest North Port PD spokesman update (Josh Taylor, guy with the beard) said that they had 50+ LE out in the 25,000+ acres of the Carlton Reserve wilderness. Someone asked why they thought BL was there and Josh said BL family told them the CR was one place that BL often visited and they believed he may be hiding there ("hiding", not "missing" there). BL's family had asked LE to come to them yesterday because they had some things to discuss. Yesterday's LE visit with BL's family was not a search warrant, but a request by the family to speak to LE. So...
What if BL's parents PURPOSELY told LE yesterday to look in CR as a diversionary tactic to divert resources away from other places that BL may be traveling? Yes, the parents could be telling the truth and really wanting to help LE. But like Qinxuan Pan's parents giving him $19,000 cash and his father's passport, many parents will still help their children even if they knowingly are assisting a suspect in a crime. And you cannot prove that the parents purposely diverted LE to CR because the parents could just say that they were just guessing but trying to help with a tip. Diversionary/distracting tactics happen everyday both in real life and in movies (the "Die Hard with a Vengeance" movie involving a fake threat of a bomb placed somewhere in the city's schools comes to mind).
Thank you, first of all!In the US, you have the legal right to refuse to talk to police without a lawyer present for any reason, or no reason at all. The only way LE can force you to come in for an interview is by arresting you, and even then you still have the right to demand a lawyer be present AND the right to refuse to answer any questions. Sadly everything BL has done so far has been very legal, albeit very strange.
It must be one of those self-driving cars.It made it's way back to his home. lol.
So "it", the car, didn't want the poor kid to have to walk for 2 hours?
I don't think it's that big of a search area. Her father seems to believe she is in Wyoming, going by his statements. ImoHe knows exactly where Gabby is and that is why they are looking for him. They want Gabby <modsnip>. She is out in the wilderness somewhere between north WY and south FL.
ADSB altitude is typically AGL... 'cuz that's all that really matters!If the ground they are searching is at 7,900 ft, yes.
Could someone explain to me why LE didn't question BL immediately after GP's mother reported her daughter as missing? I understand that LE wouldn't treat BL as a suspect, but wouldn't it make sense to question the one who was the last to have been with / seen the missing person?
…and when that person would refuse to even sit down for an interview, shouldn't that person automatically be considered a POI?
I'm woefully ignorant of US laws and I know they can vary wildly per state, but I am just wondering why this wouldn't be standard practice. Hope someone can explain
I think I may have found the answers to my post earlier.
ABC action news reports - the provided link below to support what I’m stating.
“the parents last saw him here, and then the parents say they come out here saw the Mustang and drove it back to the house”.
That clears up my observation.
hope this helps people in the group too.