No, I would have expected them to listen to the 911 call when the first caller said that he was slapping and chasing her or even the second caller who said he took her phone from her and locked her out of HER van.Those officers made a determination of the primary aggressor in a potential DV situation based upon reasonable observation. BL had injuries to his face and arm consistent with the story *both* parties told wherein GP also admitted to striking BL. They did this after initially separating GP from BL and placing her in an air-conditioned, shaded vehicle while they told BL to sit on the curb in the sun, so clearly they initially assumed that the male was the primary aggressor prior to either party making a statement. What else would you have had them do, exactly? Arrest the man by default in every potential male-female DV situation, regardless of evidence? The bias, projection and wild speculation in these threads is beyond the pale at this point. Obligatory MOO.
I would also have not had that male officer be so pally with him and talk about his experience with a toxic woman and laugh when BL called GP crazy. Disgraceful. And all his cases of DV investigation should be looked at, light of this. MOO.