MsBetsy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2018
- Messages
- 19,706
- Reaction score
- 171,455
LE wouldn't necessarily have to rely on witness testimony alone. Usually it's a combination of circumstances that put the pieces of the puzzle together. If a person witnesses a murder and their statements are consistent with autopsy findings, the witness has more credibility. (For example they report victim being stabbed 3 times in the back.)Well, The Innocence Project website states 63% of those wrongfully convicted that their work with DNA testing has freed were convicted at least partly on eyewitness testimony. So, unfortunately, eyewitness testimony isn't necessarily reliable, even about murder or other violent crimes. Of course, 52% of the exonerations involved the "misapplication of forensic science" so all circumstantial evidence can't be taken as flawless either.
Explore the Numbers: Innocence Project's Cases and Impact
In this case, they have lots of witnesses who can help with the timeline, but LE probably will try to compare that with cellphone data and surveillance footage. I doubt they depend on one piece of evidence alone. Most circumstantial cases consist of a combination of evidence that helps to support the final conclusion. Imo