ringbearer
Former Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2021
- Messages
- 639
- Reaction score
- 3,989
It might not matter in the long run. However, to my mind, it might be relevant in 3 ways I can think of (there's likely more):
1. Gabby's family has been calling for a few days, ostensibly BL &/or his family is aware of this; Gabby is finally formally reported missing Sept 11. I'm not sure what time of day that occurs, but it appears that he now disappeared within somewhere in the range of ~30 hrs of the official missing person police report. This closer proximity even more strongly suggests a possible consciousness of guilt, IMO.
2. If he left on the 13th, as opposed to the 14th, that means the parents waited 4--not 3--days to report him missing. 3 days is strange & long enough. However, one could argue, the more time between his disappearance & the report of him being missing is that much more time for planning & escape. A full 24 hours extra... a person could be anywhere on Earth by any means of transportation, potentially. IMO.
3. Revising the timeline like this calls into doubt the credibility of their story/stories overall. Another poster posted just a few moments ago: who's to say he wasn't gone before the 13th? Which I think is a very good question (especially considering the phone was bought Sept 4th, & he apparently saw his entire family for a final time at remote location Sept 6th). I think it leads to speculation that he was gone longer than we realize &/or that his parents were involved &/or they still aren't being honest. How could someone not remember the day their son disappeared? That defies logic & credibility IMO.
So TL;DR: the revision of the date he went missing might matter to his consciousness of guilt; whether he was aided in anyway; & whether this new version is even the true story or further obfuscation. JMO!
You make good points. I just don't think that, in the grand scheme, one day makes a difference and could not be a mistake considering the circumstances. jmo.