If he had signature authority, I'm quite sure he wouldn't have been charged. jmoThey have to have signature authority from the bank institution for it to be legal. Some do let others use their cards-kids etc but it’s not technically legal.
If he had signature authority, I'm quite sure he wouldn't have been charged. jmoThey have to have signature authority from the bank institution for it to be legal. Some do let others use their cards-kids etc but it’s not technically legal.
I don't think they even got settled in before he killed her. I'll bet they also had an argument over the camp spot (it wasn't a legal spot; it was in the specified camping area, but not numbered). I have a feeling GP wouldn't have wanted to camp illegally.I think he killed her night of the restaurant incident in Jackson. He was probably enraged that Gabby went back into the restaurant to apologize for his behavior.
That tent interior is completely staged. I'll bet it doesn't have any relevance to how they normally arranged it.
Agreed. I don’t condone her slapping him, but I understand why she did. I believe Gabby had tried to use her words, tried to make space, tried to ask him to stop. But you are right! Just telling her to calm down, especially while still instigating the situation and trying to inflame it is just another way to gaslight her.
I heard a professional on TV last night explain the difference.Even if Gabby had Brian's blood under her nails, I truly expect the defense to excuse it away as rough sex or blood play (don't look it up).
Or other primates.i read this as somewhat gallows humor - meaning only one with opposable thumbs could manage a strangling by any means (with possible exception to certain snakes i guess...)
If he had signature authority, I'm quite sure he wouldn't have been charged. jmo
I have a hard time believing she slapped him solely because he told her to calm down. Not considering the abuse that was witnessed by the people who called 911 and his reaction at the restaurant and heaven knows what else no one saw. I would’ve punched him if he was trying to keep me out of my vehicle, take my phone, and perhaps leave me stranded. And if he made threats while driving.
When someone is trying to harm you of course you slap back. If she had told the complete story during the traffic incident he would probably have taken it out on her later. The officers completely missed the tells.
MOO
I think they had a very heated discussion and painted him In a very bad.light!
The anger turned to rage!
He pounced.
Believe me.it happens really fast!
I know. Years ago, they used to require a notarized statement or at least a note. I remember I let my granddaughter use it when she was young and the cashier called me. Nowadays, life is too hectic. I haven’t seen a lot of card matching up to drivers license. We just swipe and go. I don’t hear cashiers - asking, can I see your card? Same thing at a kiosk.They have to have signature authority from the bank institution for it to be legal. Some do let others use their cards-kids etc but it’s not technically legal.
I know. Years ago, they used to require a notarized statement or at least a note. I remember I let my granddaughter use it when she was young and the cashier called me. Nowadays, life is too hectic. I haven’t seen a lot of card matching up to drivers license. We just swipe and go. I don’t hear cashiers - asking, can I see your card? Same thing at a kiosk.
Brian, is that you?
I agree with your assessment and it brought some thoughts to mind: We've seen that Brian is someone who seems rigid about following his ideology. Example: the "no plastic water bottles" even in a situation where they really needed water and were offered some by the cops during a nonstandard and stressful encounter.
(I'm talking about positive ideologies, like environmental values and commitments to live a low-footprint lifestyle, or to eat healthy, exercise, etc. Not religious ideologies or others based solely on one person's opinion.)
I've been in a relationship with someone who was strongly ideology-driven in this way, and to an extent I am as well, so it didn't feel like a downside to our relationship, even when I was pressured by my partner. I interpreted pressure or chastising by him as me being 'weak' and tempted to compromise my values, and him holding strong and supporting me in sticking with my values.
In fact I believe that kind of support is a major plus in many relationships, and that there is a gray area in the middle in terms of whether the rigid person is offering support or whether they are being oppressive and controlling. Personally I think the path to staying on the healthy side of that line is communication and respect, so that any input is known to be welcomed. Unfortunately too many people don't hold to high standards of communication or of respect, just in general and MEO/MOO.
I can easily see BL being this sort of rigid about his values, and that being the primary source of his criticism of everyone else including GP. And if GP saw BL's beliefs as worthy values, then she could have had a much harder time seeing his oppression/domination/control for what it was.
MOO and MEO
ITA it is staged. I don't watch reality tv shows because they all seem staged. jmoThat tent interior is completely staged. I'll bet it doesn't have any relevance to how they normally arranged it.
Would you mind posting photos of the holes? IIRC they were on low-lying logs.I have given this much thought this morning and I agree. I think the orange paint marks on the trees where she was found are holes that were made to hold up a tent or a tarp.
They CAT scanned her ENTIRE body.I had this very question yesterday on whether it will discount the results of the autopsy. I agree with you that regardless of what he says or thinks, the autopsy is forensic analysis. It's not just his words but there are going to be pictures and proof of what he reported. Maybe even a few other personnel who were in there. Toxicology reports, weight of the heart/brain or the bones on the neck aren't going change because of his opinion.
You can camp wherever you want in those dispersed national forest areas. There are designated spots but its fine to camp where you have some space from others. Making new fire rings there is not allowed though (but still common and a source of wildfire out there in the past) After looking at the map though they may have actually been into GTNP across the creek? That would technically require a permit... https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd629693.pdfI don't think they even got settled in before he killed her. I'll bet they also had an argument over the camp spot (it wasn't a legal spot; it was in the specified camping area, but not numbered). I have a feeling GP wouldn't have wanted to camp illegally.
IMOO... I am having trouble with BL and GP sleeping in a tent on either the night of 8/27 with low temperature of 39, night of 8/28, low temp 33. Anyone else think they were prepared for these temperatures with the proper gear. Sleeping bag, sweatshirts yes but did they have long johns, hats that cover ears etc..? I have skied at 14 below but you have the gear. Were they prepared? Possible theories on how they ended up in this location has been thoroughly discussed but the camping overnight is one I can't seem to accept due to the cold weather at night.
Does hair really grow that long in one month?
Pine boring beetle holes?I have given this much thought this morning and I agree. I think the orange paint marks on the trees where she was found are holes that were made to hold up a tent or a tarp.
I agree about DNA under the nails, but remember they were engaged - or at least in a relationship - so any attorney for BL is going to explain that away with that and the fact that they were in a Van for months together. (At least that's what I would start to argue.) MOO