kittythehare
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 18,562
- Reaction score
- 109,056
Good morning, I had no idea it was this late.Good Morning - The thread is OPEN.
Good morning, I had no idea it was this late.Good Morning - The thread is OPEN.
On September 17, a search warrant was filed through Sarasota County, stating that the last communication, via text message, from “the subject,” referring to GP, was on August 27, 2021.10/14:
As a parent, when your child does something bad, gets in trouble, or commits an unbelievably heinous act, everything you’ve witnessed that is good in your child before the terrible deed isn’t wiped out by the one bad deed— even murder.
As parents, the memories we carry of our children are complicated and mostly good.
While I believe most of us would teach our children to face the consequences of their actions and, in this case, turn themselves in, no matter how awful the result, we don’t know what Brian told his parents.
We can’t know that because they aren’t saying anything, we can’t even guess. We have no information to go on.
Again, the search last Thursday came up empty in the reserve after Chris Laundrie assisted authorities, Bertolini said in a text message to Telemundo affiliate WRMD of Tampa.
All the updates regarding when Brian was last seen and where Brian was last seen are coming from a) people who have changed their story, b) are the parents of the accused, c) have been stated only via legal counsel.
The Laundrie’s legal counsel is setting the stage for a possible trial. Amoral? Yes. Legal? I think so. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
If you look at Steven Bertolini’s statements, he says the same thing again and again: Brian Laundrie’s parents saw him last on September 13, and they have no idea about his whereabouts. More or less. The lawyer makes some version of this refrain again and again.
“They do not know the whereabouts of their son.”
We have never heard the parents speak. We have never heard their voices. We have never seen their mannerisms when talking about their missing daughter-in-law or when talking about their missing son.
The public has never had the chance to decipher and dissect their body language. Each statement the parents have made has been through their attorney, Steven Bertolini.
Every statement has been in print. You can’t tell anything from print; it’s devoid of emotion. That’s why texting causes so many problems when communicating — it lacks feeling. It has no tone.
As much as I can’t stand these people, they are methodical and serious about keeping their son and themselves out of jail. Usually, people talk. According to Brian’s older sibling, Cassie, they aren’t even talking to her.
On September 22, 2021, the U.S. District Court of Wyoming issued a Federal Arrest warrant for Brian Laundrie
Meaning, after Brian killed Gabby, he took her credit/ATM card and used it for expenses on the drive from The Grand Tetons to North Point, Florida, between August 29 and September 1.
The following statement from their lawyer, Steven Bertolini, tells us that the lawyer knows Brian killed Gabby. Thus, the parents have probably told the lawyer they know their son is guilty.
“It is my understanding that the arrest warrant for Brian Laundrie is related to the activities occurring after the death of Gabby Petito and not related to her actual demise…”
Reminder: this statement was made before the coroner gave the time and manner of death on October 12.
The key word that tips us off is “after.”
Bertolini seems to think this arrest warrant relates to August 29 to September 1 — that period, and according to him, that period is *after* Gabby’s demise. So, apparently, Steven Bartolini thinks Brian Laundrie killed her as well, or he would not have made that slip-up, stating that the dates (August 27 to September 1) were AFTER her demise.
Gabby Petito’s body was not found until September 19.
How on earth does Steven Bertolino or the Laundrie family know when Gabby Petito died?
Before yesterday, no one knew that.
The police hadn’t said anything. The coroner hadn’t said anything. No one knew. Not even her family had confirmation from the coroner regarding time of death before yesterday. The coroner had not said anything publicly about the time of her death.
Before yesterday, for all we knew, Gabby was killed on September 7 or the 15th.
We know she wasn’t killed on the 7th or the 15th because we all think Brian Laundrie ended Gabby’s life before he drove the van home without her, some time between the night of August 27 and August 29. We, the public think she died between August 27 to 29 (Gabby’s was last seen on the 27 and a couple picked up Brian hitchhiking on the 29th), but we think that because we think Brian Laundrie killed her.
And I guess Steven Bertolini does as well.
Here’s Why We Know They Know Laundrie Did It
Good catch.He did say it wasn't CL or RL.
notice his words tho on if it were CaL.
Ashleigh asks: "was it Cassie?"
He did not say "no".
imo, he bought time when answering the question and said: "excuse me?" So he could dodge the question.
He said: "Cassie was not in the household at all".
That does not mean that CaL did not make the report.
imo.
After SB states Cassie was not in the household at all, he goes on to list the people who were. RL, CL, two representatives from the NPPD, the FBI, and himself via Facetime. My interpretation of this whole thing is that one of the officers present that evening (NPPD or FBI) is the one who started the official missing person report. JMOHe did say it wasn't CL or RL.
notice his words tho on if it were CaL.
Ashleigh asks: "was it Cassie?"
He did not say "no".
imo, he bought time when answering the question and said: "excuse me?" So he could dodge the question.
He said: "Cassie was not in the household at all".
That does not mean that CaL did not make the report.
imo.
He did say it wasn't CL or RL.
notice his words tho on if it were CaL.
Ashleigh asks: "was it Cassie?"
He did not say "no".
imo, he bought time when answering the question and said: "excuse me?" So he could dodge the question.
He said: "Cassie was not in the household at all".
That does not mean that CaL did not make the report.
imo.
He did say it wasn't CL or RL.
notice his words tho on if it were CaL.
Ashleigh asks: "was it Cassie?"
He did not say "no".
imo, he bought time when answering the question and said: "excuse me?" So he could dodge the question.
He said: "Cassie was not in the household at all".
That does not mean that CaL did not make the report.
imo.
Thats exactly what I was thinking after I listened to it a couple of times - when he says household he just means in their house at the time. SB mudies the waters every time he does an interview! JMOAfter SB states Cassie was not in the household at all, he goes on to list the people who were. RL, CL, two representatives from the NPPD, the FBI, and himself via Facetime. My interpretation of this whole thing is that one of the officers present that evening (NPPD or FBI) is the one who started the official missing person report. JMO
I doubt that it was CaL. She wasn't in the house and reportedly wasn't speaking with the parents...jmo Maybe Chris called FBI and FBI notified NPPD?If CaL is the one who reported BL as a missing person, and that now seems quite possible, it explains why she was ostracized by ChL and RL. I don't know when, if ever, to trust anything that SB says, but things like this erase a lot of the compassion I have had for the Laundrie parents. This case just gets worse with additional information, or at least every time SB opens his mouth.
His ability for using language in a non standard way and then getting bent out of shape when people read his language in a standard way is pretty epic. See also: grieving, Monday, household, report, etc.
I have a feeling CaL is/will be the key to a lot of information to the FBI. SB realizes this and is/will be avoiding her in any interview questions.He did say it wasn't CL or RL.
notice his words tho on if it were CaL.
Ashleigh asks: "was it Cassie?"
He did not say "no".
imo, he bought time when answering the question and said: "excuse me?" So he could dodge the question.
He said: "Cassie was not in the household at all".
That does not mean that CaL did not make the report.
imo.
I think we can't equate. House = household. He was fuzzy about that and seemed to understand what he had said by accident. By listing who was in the house, and calling it "household" he was imo trying to fuzzy up what he had just implied, ie that "household" = family.I doubt that it was CaL. She wasn't in the house and reportedly wasn't speaking with the parents...jmo Maybe Chris called FBI and FBI notified NPPD?
It's the only thing that makes sense to me. It's solid proof authorities knew he entered and didn't leave. I wonder why it was mentioned here but never discussed, it's seems to be a pretty important piece of this puzzle. JMO