BigMomma
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,070
- Reaction score
- 0
I believe we have seen a few instances of Richard Grund mixing up his timelines. As we have seen in a number of statements made to the LE regarding witnesses who were supporting FCA, making an LE statement does not make it fact.
So what you are saying is that the oversight by M&M is not overshadowed by FCA or her lawyers (who were constantly in the media) making a very clear statement that Zenaida Gonzales is NOT FCA'S Nanny - that she is an innocent person. And it also overshadows FCA lying to CA by saying she was not shown any pictures of the "Nanny".
Not in my house it doesn't.
:seeya:I sort of tend to agree. For the longest time I think a lot of us just took for granted Zanny and this whoever ZFG was, were one and the same person, but obviously, that was never the case. Obvious 1 is imaginanny and the other; well, someone took great amount of time to pick on from whatever resources they used. I'd also have to go back into past notes because what LA had supposedly stated; that OCA told him she stalked out Sawgrass-jmo, but how do we really know if OCA actually told this to LA? We don't. There were a bunch of those group meetings with JG and the rest of the group of friends who were trying to help solve this mystery and we all know by now how words get twisted a la A speak.