logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
Thanks, that is a good article. :thumb:
Yes, it makes a bit more sense now doesn't it? When I first read the news about the ruling I thought - WTH? :banghead:
Thanks, that is a good article. :thumb:
Thanks, that is a good article. :thumb:
IIRC, the subpeona was served to her lawyer for her appearance. There were articles posted about that when it occurred, again IIRCIf they subpeoned her to appear that means they finally know where she is! If I remember correctly, they were having that challenge.
If they subpeoned her to appear that means they finally know where she is! If I remember correctly, they were having that challenge.
Yes, they know exactly where she was- Matt Morgan was interviewed after they found her and said it had taken his investigators months to locate her but weren't able to serve her, so Mason finally agreed to accept service for
her. I think Morgan's investigators would have laid seige to her residence if he hadn't so he had not much choice at that point. She and all her attys
have to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing.
Wesh.com has expanded their information on the ZG hearing today, including a clip of Bob Kealing reporting and lawyers from each side commenting - worth watching for those interested in what is going on.
http://www.wesh.com/news/casey-anth...uit/-/13479888/16852912/-/84lodk/-/index.html
I am not so worried now - and they say "Anthony" will have to attend the trial.
PS: don't be put off by the clip that looks like it more FCA video diary stuff - that is all of her you will see.
Ding, Ding, Ding!:seeya: I know the answer to that. His civil trial was held in Santa Monica, where the crimes were actually committed, as opposed to downtown L.A., where the criminal trial was held. He had a jury of his rich peers.I'm trying to remember if OJ had his civil trial moved to another venue?
Anyone know?
That was interesting. Why can't Casey plead the 5th if her appeals have
been resolved before then?
I noticed Mr Greene had to stab George one more time... this man is as bad
as Casey. She can certainly pick 'em.
That was interesting. Why can't Casey plead the 5th if her appeals have
been resolved before then?
I noticed Mr Greene had to stab George one more time... this man is as bad
as Casey. She can certainly pick 'em.
That was interesting. Why can't Casey plead the 5th if her appeals have
been resolved before then?
I noticed Mr Greene had to stab George one more time... this man is as bad
as Casey. She can certainly pick 'em.
Ok...I know this is a silly question, but if she's granted a new trial and loses, could she be subjected to the penalties/sentencing guidelines that Caylee's Law (IMHO, that's what it should be called) provides. Now wouldn't that be KARMA!!If her appeal is denied, she can't plead the 5th, because the criminal case would be over and she wouldn't be in danger of any further criminal prosecution if she is forced to testify.
If her appeal is granted and she gets her new trial on the lying convictions, she could still plead the 5th until that trial is resolved.
:boohoo: Casey doesn't want to pay....
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...hony-limit-testimony-20121009,0,6102633.story
:boohoo: Casey doesn't want to pay....
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...hony-limit-testimony-20121009,0,6102633.story
Ok...I know this is a silly question, but if she's granted a new trial and loses, could she be subjected to the penalties/sentencing guidelines that Caylee's Law (IMHO, that's what it should be called) provides. Now wouldn't that be KARMA!!
No, she can't be charged with a violation of Caylee's Law at this point, regardless of what happens with her appeal on the lying to LE charges. Besides, IMO it would probably be unconstitutional to apply Caylee's Law to anyone who has caused the disappearance of the child by their own criminal act. You can't force people to incriminate themselves.
No, she can't be charged with a violation of Caylee's Law at this point, regardless of what happens with her appeal on the lying to LE charges. Besides, IMO it would probably be unconstitutional to apply Caylee's Law to anyone who has caused the disappearance of the child by their own criminal act. You can't force people to incriminate themselves.