I guess I must be the only person here who wants to see ZG lose this suit. It's a trivial lawsuit, IMO. No matter how much the world hates KC and thinks she got away with murder, is there ANYONE who believes this story of the nanny? Maybe it's just any prospective employers of ZG that believes it. She can't get a job because of it? That's a bunch of BS. She doesn't WANT a job. She wants to get something for nothing and get her 15 minutes of fame for being involved with the story. The police didn't even believe KC about this nanny when they went to interview ZG--they didn't arrest her. Her name is not even ZFG...no middle initial of "F" ever used by her, and none of the other ZG's filed a lawsuit, did they? The point IS, everyone knows KC lied about ZFG, and this is not what is keeping this ZG unemployed. When's HER book coming out?
I couldn't agree more.
This is ridiculous and only serves to further enrage the community.
If she had not filed this claim, no in the world would ever associate her face to this case. Most people would not even know the full name of the phantom, rather just "the nanny" or "zanny the nanny".
I bet we could not find a dozen people in the world that could actually say they believed that casey had a nanny, let alone that this nanny (ZFG), kidnapped Caylee.
Yet this ZG, has stated in legal documents that this has prevented her from getting work. She should drop the lawsuit and play the lotto if she did apply for work with the only person to believe this story AND believe that ZG is the kidnapper.....in the most highly followed missing/murdered child case ever; who, rather than fleeing the state is applying for an entry level, low-paying job, with her real kidnapper identity no less. WOW!
WHATEVER!
So many people support her and this claim as if she deserves some money for her trouble. I don't get it, isn't that making money off of a murdered child?
If she just wants her name cleared, her attorney can negotiate a public and legally binding statement from casey through her attorney without a monetary reward.
My last thought, why hasn't LE been disposed in this case, where is the demand letter to LE requesting a public statement to clear ZG of any involvement?
When Casey was indicted, as a lone defendant, it seems that that clears ZG, whose name was the least mentioned name in the zanny the nanny trial.