Speaking of a person is not grounds for a lawsuit.
Chilly one, did you bother to listen to the video?
Some of your comments have led me to believe you might have bypassed it.
Good information.....you might enjoy watching it.
Speaking of a person is not grounds for a lawsuit.
I have done a complete 180 on how I see the ZG thing. For a long time I thought there was NO WAY it could be a coincidence - I looked for connections - and considered a lot of them - it drove me crazy (almost.)
Now - I think it was a coincidence. Some of the reasons have been listed in prior posts - she was not ZFG - R was her third initial really - not F - and Casey said she lived with 2 roomates - not daughters - different names, etc...
Now - can you imagine Casey's surprise - when she learned ZG had been at Sawgrass? Do you think she flinched?
We don't even know for a fact that Casey told that story at all. Regardless, that story came out long after it was announced that ZG and ZFG are not the same person.I think it said THEIR three kids.
Chilly one, did you bother to listen to the video?
Some of your comments have led me to believe you might have bypassed it.
Good information.....you might enjoy watching it.
Either ZG's attorney did not do proper research before taking this case, or he's looking for media attention.
She was not working at the time Caylee went missing according to her attorney and is not working now. It was reported that jobs were offered to her after her last interview - why isn't she working? Casey did not accuse ZG of being THE ZFG, she specifically said she wasn't. If people found ZG's myspace and left hate mail, that's not Casey's fault unless she was one of the people who left a message. Let's put the blame where it really belongs - on the people who intruded into every aspect of this woman's life AFTER being told that she had no part in whatever happened to Caylee.
I don't mean to be a smart arze, truly I don't, but that's the purpose of filing suit and letting a court of law decide the question. Me? I'm not a court of law; I just have opinions.
I'm sorry, I don't understand your post.
EDIT: Nevermind, I see you clarified. Anyone can file a lawsuit. A judge will decide in the early stages, before it gets to court, if there is merit for the case to continue. If ZG can not prove that Casey was accusing her specifically of being the kidnapping nanny, the suit will be dropped.
KC will not have to testify in the criminal case but she will have to be deposed and answer questions in the civil case. May be the closest thing we get to some answers from her...which probably won't make any sense, but still.
But the intrusion in her life is all because of Casey, regardless of LE clearing her name...
Who was it that said Cindy was saying that the authorities found the wrong Zenaida? My question would be HOW would she know? She never met the 'nanny' (I hate them calling this person that) Matter of fact Cindy and George didn't have the 'nanny's' phone number, didn't know where she lived, never saw her - so I ask, WHAT grandparent, who takes care of the child ALL of the time, would NOT have the babysitters number? What if there is an emergency? What if they want to just go and pick her up and go to the park?
When I lived at home, when my kids were 2 and one was just born, my parents had my babysitters name, number, address - they met the babysitter - my work had my babysitters name, number and address AND our doctor had the babysitters name, number and address - so for me this is sooooooo foreign that Cindy and George had no clue where Caylee was, who she was with, or any of her activities
Well, KC managed it!
It's none of our business how ZG afforded anything. She's not the criminal, here.
Originally Posted by Chilly Willy
On what grounds?
Repeating Casey's lies
I'm glad she's suing. This poor woman has had NOTHING but grief. There were many people who were harassing her on the phone, on MySpace and at work because for some reason THEY believe (at least parts of) Casey's ZG story. I asked people more than once to quit harassing this poor woman. I'm glad that she's suing Casey. Will she win? I don't think it matters one way or the other. It may finally stop nasty people from claiming she had something to do with Caylee's disappearance and allow her to get a new job.
Hey, Chilly -- I went back to the docs you linked me to. Yep, I did miss the statement and the card. But, you know what? Now that the statement is fresh in my mind? Z says: "On July 16, 2008, the Orange County Sheriff's Office contacted me..." Can you give me any potential way that they got her name if not from KC and the A's? (Link to this is the original docs, part 1, p. 49)
You guys are demonstrating why she should go to court. Our adversarial system is based on arguments for and against the complaint. You all are making arguments on each side and that is exactly what court is for.. The better argument will prevail.
I think this is going to be an interesting case if it makes it to trial.