Good Morning.
I am not sure that "Everyone is baying for blood" because I know I am not. There is no proof, other than Jodi's, that Travis was a pedofile. And really, she doesn't even have any proof. She sees a picture of a boy on a bed and Travis is masturbating and that deems him a pedofile. Seriously, if that were true, and it is not imo, how does she know that the pictures on the bed were there for pleasuring himself. Maybe the "non existant" pictures existed for a diff. reason., like a collage project, or whatever?? This fabricated incident to introduce pedofilia into her defense is just plain STUPID.
Human Sexuality is a taboo subject and many people have personal hangups with it. So- Jodi used it to her advantage for a defense. In actuality, imo, they had a rather healthy sexual relationship. What they did behind closed doors, what they explored sexually together> on the porch, in the forest, phone sex, maid costumes, and finally pop rocks and tootsie pops can just as well reflect great compatability sexually. Phone sex and fantasy sex is practised by THOUSANDS of people. It is not dirty. Their SEXual experiences do not deem travis as "well, he was not a saint", or "he was no angel" So , if anyone with sexual hangups can take sex out of the equation, then YES - you will see Travis was pretty much a saint, and Jodi > the devil.