Nosey Parker
A Brit in Canada
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,335
- Reaction score
- 25
There were a couple of answers from JA today that I found truly disturbing and I wonder how the jury reacted.
Question had to do with "As I understand it now" responses to violence in the relationship with TA. Her answer was that time helped her understand his behavior was violent and with time, she has forgiven him (want to see actual quote). This smacked me in the gut; she slaughtered him and now she is forgiving him?
Couple of questions later, she was asked again about why she waited so long to tell the truth. Again, that same answer about feeling ashamed. I don't know if she has been coached to use that particular word, but it is not the right word for me, and I doubt that it is for the jury either.
Would you tell the truth if you were never arrested. Perhaps one of the few times she was truthful, "I honestly don't know." A lot of questions from the jury have to do with trying to determine her morals and conscience. IMO, her answers show she has none.
Why talk to 48 Hours and other programs. My stomach literally turned listening to her answer...she started off by saying it was not a big deal and went on this bent for a while. It almost sounded as if she was saying the murder was not a big deal. I need to listen to this again, but it hit me so, so wrong when I first heard it and I was left only with the negative impression.
Hope DA does not go over every question...can he see the forest for the trees? He is not feeling confident right now.
Not being saucy in any way, but the part I bolded - is that a typo?
ETA: Oh, just realised you might mean Defence Attorney. I'm sorry if that's the case. I thought you were meaning District Attorney