11/9/11 MSM reports "major change" to timeline (Oct. 4 phone call)

[treeseeker]

The 2:30 text was first reported as something DB said LE told her. I don't recall who, but it was reported at the same that DB said their phones couldn't make calls. The two snippets came out together, IIRC. The non-working service is the reason she discounted the text.

 

[CathyinTexas]

I'm not good with names, what was that case with an older girl (college-ish?) who was home with her brother, Dad had already left for work, man drug her into the woods. Story changed a bit here and there?

Long way of saying that they determined the man did in fact hang out in the bushes and wait. That's what people awaiting a crime do, they watch for the coast to be clear.

Just a thought, not putting it out there as gospel.

I have thought that it is possible that the perpetrator/abductor did enter the house while DB was still outside. It is very common for burglars or rapists to do this. I remember a publicized case where "granny" was threatening to shoot or did shoot a man who she found in her closet! I also think it is very likely that the person who did this was not in their right mind and under the influence of meth, as we have heard is common with some of the characters in this case. I have not been quite as agreeing with those who cite statistics in these types of cases. Nothing about this case seems to fit statistics with all of the colorful "persons of interests".

 

[tehcloser]

Sure

"We need them to sit down apart from each other, with detectives, and answer the tough questions detectives have for them concerning what they may or may not know about anything, who came and went [the night Lisa disappeared]," Young told ABCNews.com. "There's a whole list of things that they may know."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-baby-lisa-irwin-police-tough-questions-parents/story?id=14810300

Thank you.........That statement tells me that DB does not want to be interviewed apart from each other BECAUSE of who was coming and going that night. IMO she is hiding more than what happened to Lisa from JI.

 

[Cazzie]

Sure

"We need them to sit down apart from each other, with detectives, and answer the tough questions detectives have for them concerning what they may or may not know about anything, who came and went [the night Lisa disappeared]," Young told ABCNews.com. "There's a whole list of things that they may know."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-baby-lisa-irwin-police-tough-questions-parents/story?id=14810300

TYSM!!!

I'd been searching for "coming and going" and came up with pages and pages of posts here. The Search function, even the Advanced Search function needs SO much improvement. Or maybe I don't know the proper syntax for search criteria. It doesn't appear to recognize quotes around 2 or more words. /rant

 

[Donjeta]

TYSM!!!

I'd been searching for "coming and going" and came up with pages and pages of posts here. The Search function, even the Advanced Search function needs SO much improvement. Or maybe I don't know the proper syntax for search criteria. It doesn't appear to recognize quotes around 2 or more words. /rant

I just googled "lisa irwin steve young who came and went"

Sometimes google works better than the search function here, just put "websleuths" and whatever you want to search for.

 

[Cazzie]

Thank you.........That statement tells me that DB does not want to be interviewed apart from each other BECAUSE of who was coming and going that night. IMO she is hiding more than what happened to Lisa from JI.

PLUS, IMO, they don't want to be separated in interrogations (ok, LE interviews) becuz they are trying to keep their stories straight. JMO. And even, JMO, neither trusts the other to not implicate the other, so they are adamant in their stance to keep a united front. JMO, also (but secondarily), they want to maintain a unified front for their public image. Oh gee...SO MUCH more is needed to improve their public image. Cough, cough.

 

[Tuffy]

wonder if MK will have any "legit" news for us today from any other "source close to the investigation"

I have found that on other cases the "sources close to the investigation" were 100% right when all was said and done.

I'm not so quick to dismiss the "sources."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Tuffy]

I have thought that it is possible that the perpetrator/abductor did enter the house while DB was still outside. It is very common for burglars or rapists to do this. I remember a publicized case where "granny" was threatening to shoot or did shoot a man who she found in her closet! I also think it is very likely that the person who did this was not in their right mind and under the influence of meth, as we have heard is common with some of the characters in this case. I have not been quite as agreeing with those who cite statistics in these types of cases. Nothing about this case seems to fit statistics with all of the colorful "persons of interests".

The "gun toting granny" was in Texas. I remember the 911 calls being played.

He hid in the closet when she and her daughter came home. She ended up shooting him when he tried to move. Not fatally. Lol I remember hearing the 911 operator saying "ma'am you're going to have to stop shooting him" :floorlaugh:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[annalia]

Sure

"We need them to sit down apart from each other, with detectives, and answer the tough questions detectives have for them concerning what they may or may not know about anything, who came and went [the night Lisa disappeared]," Young told ABCNews.com. "There's a whole list of things that they may know."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-baby-lisa-irwin-police-tough-questions-parents/story?id=14810300

Thank you for that link.

Keeping the whole thing in context this really answers, for me at least, just what LE meant by "unrestricted". It is answering tough questions and seperate interviews, not that they want them to do it without any attorney present.

JMHO

 

[Cazzie]

Thank you for that link.

Keeping the whole thing in context this really answers, for me at least, just what LE meant by "unrestricted". It is answering tough questions and seperate interviews, not that they want them to do it without any attorney present.

JMHO

Exactly, IMO. And of course, there probably are a plethora <sp> of questions that DB and JI (or separately) do not want to answer at all.

Such suspicious behavior, IMO. What are they hiding? What are each hiding?

They hired the same defense attorney that represented Van der Sloot!

Who does this? If they are innocent...

JMO but they selected JT *becuz* he represented VdS....

/rant I'm really losing patience with DB and JI...even tho I never had any to begin with...KWIM?

 

[IHAVENOCLUE]

Exactly, IMO. And of course, there probably are a plethora <sp> of questions that DB and JI (or separately) do not want to answer at all.

Such suspicious behavior, IMO. What are they hiding? What are each hiding?

They hired the same defense attorney that represented Van der Sloot!

Who does this? If they are innocent...

JMO but they selected JT *becuz* he represented VdS....

/rant I'm really losing patience with DB and JI...even tho I never had any to begin with...KWIM?

I have really been having a problem why this attorney, who represented Van der Sloot no less, was chosen to defend them. That puts a big Red Flag up for me, too.

 

[SoSueMe]

Today is a new day and this thread will be closing shortly. Please take the MSM discussion to the new thread:

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154292"]MSM coverage of Baby Lisa 11/10/11 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]



Thanks!

:blowkiss: