11/9/11 MSM reports "major change" to timeline (Oct. 4 phone call)

[MissJames]

Well searching via mobile certainly is challenging but I had to find the video and link showing that MW DID GET HER PHONE BACK THAT NIGHT AT 11:00pm.. I knew that she had originally stated that she had no clue who, if anyone had answered the call that came in from the Irwin/Bradley cell phone at 8-8:30pm on the night Lisa disappeared.. But most importantly that she'd gotten her cell phone back in her possession shortly thereafter the 8:30pm call so she could confirm/verify THAT HER CELL RECEIVED NO CALL AT/AROUND 2:30am DUE TO HER HAVING HER PHONE BACK IN HER POSSESSION!!

As I said absolutely contradicting her now accounting that "Dane" had her phone for 2 days!!

Here's the direct quote of Megan Wright followed by a link that includes the video of the info that she had her cell phone IN HER POSSESSION THAT NIGHT coming straight from the horsie's mouth..

http://m.kctv5.com/w/main/story/44781037/

Via mobile? You are good! :rocker:

Now,have you figured out why MW is so "confused" ? :crazy:

 

[Sparklin]

Would LE have had the phone records that quickly because they sure as heck didn't have the phones. :waitasec:

From what I understand they contacted her 4 days later in regards to the Craigslist ad.

MOO

HOLY...that's true! I need to go find that.

 

[Kamille]

I confess I was completely confounded by the supposed 8:30 call, but if calls were placed at 11:57 or 2:30, or both, I could envision a scenario where the kidnapper is expecting an earlier rendezvous with someone and for some reason that rendezvous becomes aborted. Not having a phone of his own, he uses one of the three stolen phones to call his compatriot and find out what's going on.

The nearest Waffle House that I can find in the area is about eight-tenths of a mile from the intersection of 48th and Randolph, where an eyewitness sighting was purportedly made, right at the intersection of NE Parvin and Randolph. Nothing is certain, but MW's mention of being there at 3:00 a.m. gives her an alibi for being out and in that area at the time.

I guess we're not going to be hearing from her "boyfriend of the day" at the time of these alleged calls since she's indicated that he dumped her because of all the press. Although he was with her during the rendevous with the FBI for the GPS sale. I wonder if he was with her at the Waffle House? :waitasec:

 

[Sparklin]

http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...ng-Irwin-phone-wants-her-name-cleared-in-case

she says it right here at 1:42 either that night or the next day

 

[yllek]

IMO it's glaringly apparent that Megan Wright is NOT being the least bit honest about anything regarding the phone.. IMO it's become very apparent that he "account" of the cell phone, and whose possession it was in is being altered to attempt to remove herself from the call that came in. I personally believe it's very likely that LE has manipulated the times and actions of that night to see what MW's reaction is.. If she doesn't alter her statements and account of the phone they'd know it'd be more likely she's being honest about the information she's giving them.. But in their with holding certain "key" times or details they see that MW doesn't know her head from a hole in the ground and doesn't know whats the "right" thing to say to keep her at a safe distance from the phone, any calls, and any direct or indirect involvement with Lisa's case whatsoever.. That's perfectly clear to me at this point..

Is Megan directly involved in Lisa's disappearance?? I don't have a clue, I doubt it, but you damn well better believe I think she knows people who are involved in Lisa's disappearance.. I don't know if she's protecting someone or is it just her own azz she's looking out for but she certainly needs to know her statements are being broadcast nationally and the lies don't help ya one tiny bit.. Busted everytime when dealing with mKing statements especially documented

Good points Smooth.

Here's where I'm at a quandry. If Megan took that call (or if she knows who did and what it was about), she would simply make sure to say that she did not have the phone for a range of time that definitely includes the time of the call. It seems to me she really doesn't know what time that call came in. I'm not so sure if she keeps changing her story, or if the story keeps changing around her and then she gives more detail. JMO...

Regarding protecting someone, maybe. She says that she's been told Dane had the phone, but she's not sure if he picked up, let it go to voice mail or what. Earlier she said she didn't know who answered. She claims Dane said he didn't answer the call, but admits to answering a call from detectives the next day and blowing it off. Could be she really doesn't know if he answered the phone or not on the 3rd. Or, she could be lying.

I don't know about the not having the phone for a "couple of days" statement. I think I missed a piece. Did she say she didn't have it for a couple of days AFTER the alleged call? If not, I'm wondering if she didn't have the phone for a couple of days before the alleged call and got it back a few hours after the alleged 8:30 pm call. Or again, she could be lying about not having it just to distance herself from what she's knows is a troublesome call, whether she knows anything or not.

I hope we hear more about Dane soon. Who is he and who does he know? It would also be fantastic to know what time that call REALLY was placed!?

You've given me some good things to ponder. I do think Megan would be easy enough to crack for FBI and if she knew anything, they'd have gotten it out of her by now. I wonder if she took a poly. But, she may be a total con and be lying about everything to protect herself or someone else. Curious...

JMO...

 

[Sparklin]

According to Vinnie and Jim today, her car was the subject of a car-b-que on the night Lisa went missing....just down from the dumpster fire.

If I am incorrect on the night of the car fire, please, feel free to correct me ... I was pretending to listen to my maintenance coordinator and watch HLN out of the corner of my eye :waitasec:

jimspellmancnn jim spellman
@
@kitincandi a couple weeks before...Sept. 16. per Mike Brooks who tracked this down today. MW told me about this long ago, MB has confirmed

Per question re: When her car fire was.

 

[Abby Normal]

No, no, I was just jumping off at your post....I see "timeline" now and I want to throw my computer!

ME TOOO!

According to Vinnie and Jim today, her car was the subject of a car-b-que on the night Lisa went missing....just down from the dumpster fire.

If I am incorrect on the night of the car fire, please, feel free to correct me ... I was pretending to listen to my maintenance coordinator and watch HLN out of the corner of my eye :waitasec:

woahhh. If her car happened to catch fire the night she went missing I will be shocked. That sounds like evidence covering. However, what I read (on her facebook) was that it was the night she broke up with Jersey. For all we know she said both :waitasec:

So.....If Megan had her phone at 11pm and the call came at 11:57, Megan had the phone on herself?? Or am I just confuzzled??:waitasec:

I don't know... she claimed Dane still had the phone the next morning and talked to detectives when they called. but someone on this board got screen shots of her posting on facebook "for mobile" at 2/3am-ish. She claims she was at the Waffle House waiting for her food stamps to reload.

I wonder if the place she was at had WIFI, because that would eliminate the air-card reason for mobile theory. Hard to tell.

 

[yllek]

Would LE have had the phone records that quickly because they sure as heck didn't have the phones. :waitasec:

From what I understand they contacted her 4 days later in regards to the Craigslist ad.

MOO

We don't know if LE really did get the number off of Debbi's hand or maybe a slip of paper or matchbook cover at the house. LE might have had the number very shortly after being called to the Irwin house and tried to call that phone early the morning of Oct 4th only to be hung up on or blown off and tried calling again with no answer. LE may have gotten the number before getting the cell phone records and realizing that it was a signifcant number in that it had been called on Oct 3rd pm or Oct 4 am, at which time they scoured the internet, got the address, and raided that house hoping find Lisa.

JMO...

 

[serveitup]

I confess I was completely confounded by the supposed 8:30 call, but if calls were placed at 11:57 or 2:30, or both, I could envision a scenario where the kidnapper is expecting an earlier rendezvous with someone and for some reason that rendezvous becomes aborted. Not having a phone of his own, he uses one of the three stolen phones to call his compatriot and find out what's going on.

The nearest Waffle House that I can find in the area is about eight-tenths of a mile from the intersection of 48th and Randolph, where an eyewitness sighting was purportedly made, right at the intersection of NE Parvin and Randolph. Nothing is certain, but MW's mention of being there at 3:00 a.m. gives her an alibi for being out and in that area at the time.

Is that in the direction of an airport?

 

[In da Middle]

MW is placing herself at the Waffle House at 3 am and the motorcycle guy sees the man with a baby at 4 am.

Waffle House is 1.1 miles south of where the motorcycle man sees the mystery man and baby.

7401 NE Parvin Rd, Kansas City, MO 64117 to man and baby sighting 4am - Google Maps

This may not be the Waffle House she was at. Do she actually state that this one is the one she was at? She didn't live at the Brighton address at the time so it could have been another one. There are many around here. I am not saying it isn't though, but just saying that there are many around here and she wasn't necessarily living at an address where this is the closest one.

 

[Abby Normal]

http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...ng-Irwin-phone-wants-her-name-cleared-in-case

she says it right here at 1:42 either that night or the next day

She said that Dane admitted to answering the phone to detectives, blew it off, didn't take it seriously, gave a fake name, etc... and that is why they had to contact her via her GPS listing, a few days later. But according to her they tried calling the number earlier. That night or the next morning is what she said. The link is a page or two back. starts with www. nbc

 

[iamnotagolem]

Can we discuss MW's current boyfriend or is he off limits for now?

 

[highflyer]

Her facebook page says she is moving out of town.

 

[vlpate]

As NG would say.... "Whoa whoa whoa whoa!!"

What time did MW say she got the phone back?

Speaking of NG, and sorry for OT, but did anyone see NG on GMA this am? She said after she was ousted her little Lucy just wanted a bottle and to crawl in bed with mommy.....isn't Lucy like 4?

MW has changed that time line 3 times so far.

 

[ynotdivein]

Can we discuss MW's current boyfriend or is he off limits for now?

Still off limits. But :tyou: for asking first!

 

[Cazzie]

JMO. Both parents, DB and JI, need to go in to the station, answer all questions to the best of their ability and honesty..

DUH!!! JMO....

And of course!! PB and SB, JB, MW, DB, and everyone else need to do the same!...........

 

[Kamille]

We don't know if LE really did get the number off of Debbi's hand or maybe a slip of paper or matchbook cover at the house. LE might have had the number very shortly after being called to the Irwin house and tried to call that phone early the morning of Oct 4th only to be hung up on or blown off and tried calling again with no answer. LE may have gotten the number before getting the cell phone records and realizing that it was a signifcant number in that it had been called on Oct 3rd pm or Oct 4 am, at which time they scoured the internet, got the address, and raided that house hoping find Lisa.

JMO...

I don't think LE would randomly call a number off a slip of paper found in the house of a suspected abducted child. They would ask the parent's what the number is first, especially if they had checked with service providers to find out that the number was not assigned to any particular person. I don't think this happened since DB has denied being able to use phones however I don't think she has denied knowledge of a phone number that was on a piece of paper in her home. I also don't think it was on her hand. Although that would be really intriquing if true.

So I do think they got it from phone records but I just wonder how quickly they were able to get those records. :waitasec:

MW seems to be going back and forth on whether this Dane person had the phone all of the 3rd and 4th but this statement about LE calling on the 4th and speaking with him indicates that he did have it all that day. And she posted on FB with a mobile device in the early morning hours of the 4th. She also made a statement that she got the phone back between 11-11:30pm on the evening of the 3rd. So none of it makes sense.

MOO

 

[Karmaa]

We don't know if LE really did get the number off of Debbi's hand or maybe a slip of paper or matchbook cover at the house. LE might have had the number very shortly after being called to the Irwin house and tried to call that phone early the morning of Oct 4th only to be hung up on or blown off and tried calling again with no answer. LE may have gotten the number before getting the cell phone records and realizing that it was a signifcant number in that it had been called on Oct 3rd pm or Oct 4 am, at which time they scoured the internet, got the address, and raided that house hoping find Lisa.

JMO...

It is not necessary that LE got MW's number from Debbie or anything in her house. They could easily have gotten the number from the cell co. and gotten it fast. Because the account belongs to the family, LE would not have needed a subpoena for the records.

So, DB/JI tell LE that the phones are missing. They call the cell company to see if any calls were made from their accounts, and LE finds this (these?) call(s) in a matter of minutes. Or if the call was made from the borrowed phone (dad's?) then HE could have called the phone co and given permission for them to tell LE.

Remember, DB said they had never tried to call the phones themselves (after they found them missing). It seems like a reasonable theory that LE told them not to - that they were going to handle that, which would then make it reasonable that DB didn't actually have MW's number written down anywhere at all. JMO.

 

[Kamille]

This may not be the Waffle House she was at. Do she actually state that this one is the one she was at? She didn't live at the Brighton address at the time so it could have been another one. There are many around here. I am not saying it isn't though, but just saying that there are many around here and she wasn't necessarily living at an address where this is the closest one.

Do you know the name of the street where the flop house is? I thought I heard her say in an interview that is was on or just off of N Brighton? I also thought I heard her say that she was living there at the time that Lisa went missing...which indicated that she was no longer living there.

:waitasec:

 

[gwenabob]

Found her myspace: MEDUSA.

I am a pyromaniac, and I always carry lighters. (No you can't have them.)

http://www.myspace.com/eyehaveanalteregoanditsme

What a lovely, refined young lady!