Me too. Of course they are gonna claim this law doesn't cover Zimmerman. They are the ones who came up with it.
Or more like they know what they're talking about?
Me too. Of course they are gonna claim this law doesn't cover Zimmerman. They are the ones who came up with it.
If there is proof he acted with SYG law there will be no arrest,can not happen under this law.
I thought his lawyer already stated that they weren't going to use the SYG law as a defense? Just plain self-defense?
After listening to 911 calls and other witnesses, Mary C's account doesn't seem to fit with anyone else. That one guy on Anderson Cooper saw them on the ground in place and not running anywhere when shot run out. On 911 tapes, loud screams are heard up to the shot, and every body else seems to describe screaming, not crying of a "little boy."
His lawyer apparently misspoke. He's since said he thinks it was a clear-cut case. I think he got SYG and Castle Doctrine confused.I thought his lawyer already stated that they weren't going to use the SYG law as a defense? Just plain self-defense?
I 100% agree with you Lola.....That verdictabout did me in uuughhhhhhh~!!!!!!!!! IMHOIf those who made the SYG law say that it does not apply to Zimmerman, I am sure these same lawmakers can explain that to the judge/jury and let them decide.
Honestly, I'm expecting an arrest for Manslaughter within the next 9 days and that will quiet things down for a little while. I also think that Zimmerman will be bailed out of jail immediately and go right back into hiding until his trial.
Then we get to look forward to doc. dumps.
There is no verdict in the world that can be worse than Caylee's. None!
What's the difference?
They are comparing screams to normal speech. Before I believe any of it they need to show me how accurate this technique is. And therefore I can not conclude Trayvon's voice was going to be a match just because Zimmerman scored at 48 %.
You and the other posters who are making similar points may be right. I don't know. But Mary C and her roommate told Anderson C the same story.
So I will ask the same question that was asked about John's account:
What incentive would they have to lie?
What do you think the yellow object partially obstructed by the fence is?
View attachment 21390
View attachment 21391
This was in the video from the link Bessie posted where the girlfriend makes the "back porch" comment.
Tom Owen, the Voice Recognition expert who conducted the analysis, is a court-qualified expert witness and an authority on biometric voice analysis — a computerized process comparing attributes of voices to determine whether they match. This technique must be pretty accurate given that it has been deemed admissible evidence by the courts.
JMHO~
when don't have TM's voice to compare it too.
A few days ago someone here wrote a post that stated GZ had committed a homicide. Homicide was used over and over in the post (can't find it now), and I disagreed, over and over. I was wrong...... Anyone need a moment??
I believe that is why people hire attorneys for advice. I doubt if the family thought about the picture and it could have been provided by anyone in the family. As I said I have some older pictures of my grandchildren (couple of years) on my piano. The rest are in my camera, computer or on a memory disk. If someone asked me for a picture I'd probably grab the one that was already framed to give to them and not have gone through my computer in their situation. When your child dies you are like a zoombie, I mean it is the worst thing that can happen, you aren't sitting there thinking of ways to deceive people. Once the initial shock wears off you can think more clearly but to suggest this family set out from day 1 to deceive people....I just don't believe it.
I also think their attorney has better things to do than to be thinking about deceiving people with an old picture. To what end.....what would be the point? So that people can criticize them? I don't think they ever considered the option. And, let's face it if that were their intent they would have known what the results would be. Because there is always someone out there who will criticize how you handled yourself because it's not what they would do. jmo
Based on her interviews, Mary C didn't witness neither the fight nor the shooting. The story she came up with appears to be her speculation based on what she thinks she heard, and not what she had saw.
It's not required to have Trayvon's voice in order to eliminate GZ's voice in these tests.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.