Mark Nejame's explanation of the conflict of interest--
Mark Nejame on live air: Very simply if I could summarize it. We received a call (and had permission from Mr. Zimmerman to release this) on March 13 to represent him.
I respectfully declined. Too many family obligations, I just didn't want to be involved at this level at this point in my life with this case.
Then the other attorneys got involved, they left the case, and then I got called back by friends of theirs and they wanted me to take the case.
I rejected it, and by then I'd already signed a contract with CNN and am now with CNN and HLN to be a legal analyst.
Well then after that, apparently the case was charged. It was randomly assigned to Judge Recksiedler who ironically her husband Jason is my law partner. Who runs and manages the personal injury division of my law firm. So obviously we had an issue there because I had been contacted by Mr. Zimmerman and had referred Mark O'Mara the case, his current lawyer and my law partner is the husband of the woman whom I would be analyzing from time to time in my duties as a CNN analyst.
So all this was apparently brought to the attention and she is doing the right and ethical thing, by bringing it to all parties, as I understand it it has already been brought to all parties. She's doing the proper thing on the record, and the way we are dictated governed by as lawyers is we want make sure that we avoid any appearances of impropriety.
Lawers and judges want make sure we do that at all times, for, even if there is nothing going on, which of course, there is not, so that the public does not have a misunderstanding and that's what is going on here.
JMO/IMO...I do my best to transcribe accurately...any errors are unintentional.