IMO, the biggest plausibility problem with scenarios that involve the confrontation starting after the gun was pulled out is the witness who says the guy in red was on the ground. I just don't see how GZ ended up on the ground if the gun was already out.
To my mind, GZ reaching for his phone, TM thinking he's going for the gun decks him, GZ ends up on the ground, this scenario is believable. Whereas GZ has gun drawn, TM decks him, is highly doubtful.
JMO, OMO, and :moo:
There are so many plausibility problems that I just can't fathom,
How did Trayvon end up with his arms under him and his body positioned in a way that would not indicate that he was anywhere near hitting GZ's head on the concrete which was down near his feet?
What exactly was GZ doing after the dispatch told him it was not necessary to follow anyone? If he had gone immediatly back to his truck, none of it would have happened. I don't believe the going for an address for a minute, now if he was looking to see where Trayvon went, then that is still following him and negates the "He stopped following him stuff."
All the interviews about the horrible injuries, yet the actions of the first responders on the scene do not indicate that there were anything other than very minor injuries.
The video of him at the police station bears this out, not only how well he is able to walk with hands cuffed behind him but the pristine clean light gray shirt and jacket both of which could have just come off a hanger, with his shirt still tucked in, no blood stains, no wrinkles, no grass stains, holes, rips, tears, nothing at all to indicate a fierce struggle.
No injuries, nothing that the first responders felt needed a piece of tape or some gauze or a butterfly bandage, not one single thing that indicated that he had been treated for anything at all, not even a hangnail.
Now we have the deal about reaching for a gun and Trayvon saw it, and the lunging at him from a prone position...not credible in my opinion, particularly on top of the first renditions of the story....
I can't explain how the witnesses saw GZ or even anyone rolling on the ground, or what happened, but just none of this makes any kind of sense as far as how what little we do know could have happened. I particularly cannot imagine that anyone could shoot someone point blank in the chest and not realize that they sustained a serious injury....that dog won't hunt at all...and now it seems that they are gearing up to somehow change the story so that instead of the fatal shot being fired while they are both on the ground, it is going to be when they are both standing up....
The fact that there are reportedly photos of the injuries that GZ took himself, and that indicates that the PD did not take any, and yet no one has offered up those photos to prove that there was in fact a fierce struggle, one in which a grown and armed man would fear for his life from an unarmed teenager, and I can't wait to see what the official sworn under oath and signed and stuff version is, but as of now, they don't have a lucid coherent story about how an unarmed teenager got shot that would make it self defense IMO JMHO and stuff.