http://cfnews13.com/content/news/cf...icles/cfn/2012/4/23/sanford_police_chief.html
Closest thing i could find. sorry guys
Closest thing i could find. sorry guys
My point is that you get a two year degree and then go on to continue your education elsewhere. I attended a community college, as did both of my sons. Nothing wrong with that.
Because they want his public image to be in prison garb.
They want photos of him in his prison clothes to be widely circulated just as those from his first appearance were.
Prison clothes make people think "criminal" "guilty" "murderer" even though at this time, GZ is presumed innocent.
JMO
If he had already earned his degree, then why would he have to be expelled?
they do not say that he was taking classes towards any other degree, If he already has an AA then he should have been enrolled in a school that would allow him to earn a BS. It sounds as if he had not yet earned the AA that he was after to me IMO JMHO and stuff.
I personally know some defense attorneys- they will not ask their client if they are telling the truth so that they can better defend them. They do not want to know.
wow im watching the city commissioners meeting and you should see how hard some of these commissioners going to bat for chief lee, demanding to know what he di that was so wrong. where are the aws that he has broken, where did he violate sop? You cant do this to a family man with children, you just cant. These are my opinions of what i am hearing right now. Trying to finda link, but cant find one/.
I dont see anything above that was a crime though.
You can't get an AA and still be in the same college pursuing a bachelors degree?
Or maybe they wanted him treated just like anyone else, who would have probably had to wear an orange jumpsuit. GZ shouldn't get special treatment. And that suit and shackles did not have a positive impact on him. He looked sick.
http://cfnews13.com/content/news/cf...icles/cfn/2012/4/23/sanford_police_chief.html
Closest thing i could find. sorry guys
From my post on the previous thread:
If GZ spotted TM where your marker is at the 'he's running' comment and TM's ultimate destination was 379 feet from that point.
Average running speed of a human is 10mph which translates to 14.6 feet per second.
379 feet divided by 14.6 = 25.95 (seconds). Round it up to 26seconds.
So, the call from GF comes about one minute later than the 'he's running' comment. Do you deny that if TM was 26 seconds from his house from the point that 'he started running', he would of reached his house if he proceeded directly to it?
If that's the case, then every person appearing at a hearing should not be forced to wear prison garb. If the clothing is responsible for the judgement, then every accused person is entitled to the same treatment.
:jail:
If that's the case, then every person appearing at a hearing should not be forced to wear prison garb. If the clothing is responsible for the judgement, then every accused person is entitled to the same treatment.
:jail:
I'm sure most neighborhood watch groups have their own rules.
There may be shifts for some.
Maybe it's different here.
Many of our teachers, for example, graduate from CC and they are highly qualified.
It's just cheaper.
Plus it was a response to the defense asking for the suit and no shackles.
So it's ok that the defense play their game well by trying to give the public a certain perception by putting him in an oversized suit, yet the state are villains for saying no. If it's been said that it's highly unusual for a defendant to wear suits to a bond hearing, it sounds like it was the defense that wanted special privileges and they got one of them, he was allowed to wear the suit.
JMHO.