Dr.Fessel
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 10,903
- Reaction score
- 28
I based my understanding on stories in which reporters have said John told them he was outside and then went inside. ICBW.
I have never seen any of those stories.
I based my understanding on stories in which reporters have said John told them he was outside and then went inside. ICBW.
Watch the first minute of this video, when George is saying he is sorry he is looking directly at OMara. Why is OMara standing there?
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/geral...n-case-on-geraldo-at-large/?playlist_id=86916
OMara makes $6.66 a minute working as a lawyer. Why should Crump call him and help him make more money?
MOM was wearing a scrolling LED Tie that flashed what GZ was supposed to say. Jk. Btw why can't people apologize? Why does an apology equal admission? Was there a case that went against someone because they said sorry? Even when I was in a car accident that was someone else fault I apologized to the other person. But my apology meant I'm sorry for the stress/etc you feel, I am sorry this happened and you have to deal with this now, etc. Not a sorry as in oops, my bad, my fault. A sorry as in I feel the distress you are going through and I feel bad and wish I could change it. Did that make sense? Lol sorry![]()
Exactly, it was immediate that he became the new attorney and began handling the case. Given that, I would expect that Crump would be professional and return his phone calls.
Mr. Crump is obligated to HIS clients not to Mr.O'mara or his client:banghead:
What does that have to do with anything? This is a murder case and they are both attorneys working on the same case. Crump is working on the case on behalf of the victims parents, representing them. It is a professional courtesy to return the calls. Imo
What if Crump had said that he called O/Maras' office a couple of days in a row and was ignored? I think people would be outraged.
Crump represents the victim's family. He has no business calling the defendant's attorney about this case. Period. You stated earlier that MOM may have had some information regarding the case, and wanted to speak to Crump. MOM is obligated to speak to LE, Special Proscutor about the case, if he so chooses, not the victim's attorney. I would think MOM would be a little bit more professional than going through a side route.Exactly, it was immediate that he became the new attorney and began handling the case. Given that, I would expect that Crump would be professional and return his phone calls.
Crump represents the victim's family. He has no business calling the defendant's attorney about this case. Period. You stated earlier that MOM may have had some information regarding the case, and wanted to speak to Crump. MOM is obligated to speak to LE, Special Proscutor about the case, if he so chooses, not the victim's attorney. I would think MOM would be a little bit more professional than going through a side route.
JMO
I don't think most people would worry one bit about lawyers crying about another lawyer not returning their calls. :floorlaugh:
But why didn't Crump reply to the personal phone calls? That seems kind of unprofessional, imo.
My quote about John not mentioning on his 911 call that he "was already outside" was worded badly. Sorry, I was in a super rush to leave and didn't double-check before posting.
I meant to say that John does not indicate during his 911 call that he had previously witnessed the fighting while he was outside; not that he was outside while calling 911. HTH
So do you think that was what Trayvon's mom wanted him to do? Offer his condolences?
I don't think most people would worry one bit about lawyers crying about another lawyer not returning their calls. :floorlaugh:
Having worked in a law office, I disagree. Lawyers do tend to take that seriously. There is usually a level of respect shown towards each other, regardless of being on opposing sides.
I'm going to disagree that John standing inside behind a screen is the most logical assumption to make, but until we have more information about how far outside, if at all, John was, I'm going to stay on the fence on this one. JMOBBM
He was standing inside his home and with the patio door opened looking through the screen yelling at them. Simple most logical thing.
Not at all. A PERSONAL call from the lawyer of the opposing side is usually accepted immediately, because it is the professional thing to do.
I answered the phones in my fathers office in college. I took messages and told him about the calls when he checked in. UNLESS it was opposing counsel, in that case he wanted me to come and get him immediately. Usually a call like that is important.
I am surprised that Crump ignored his call.
Having worked in a law office, I disagree. Lawyers do tend to take that seriously. There is usually a level of respect shown towards each other, regardless of being on opposing sides.
Crump represents the victim's family. He has no business calling the defendant's attorney about this case. Period. You stated earlier that MOM may have had some information regarding the case, and wanted to speak to Crump. MOM is obligated to speak to LE, Special Proscutor about the case, if he so chooses, not the victim's attorney. I would think MOM would be a little bit more professional than going through a side route.
JMO
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.