2008.07.28 Lee A. Interview

Status
Not open for further replies.
What was the card that one of the police officer's swiped from Casey's wallet? Maybe something incriminating to an officer? Or someone else's ID?

I've been wondering about that too...he says it was white and that's about it right?
 
<<Inappropriate laughter seems to be a family trait. Interesting.>>

As does the family's use of the word "absolutely".

I noticed that as well. KC & LA are 2 peas in a pod that is why I don't believe much of what he has to say.
 
maybe not evidence but pretty rude considering how she told Amy honey she would never see her money again. Seems she would have offered that back to Amy. jmo and my ethics.

Oh ITA, did you catch -in Amy's intv when Cindy said “honey, that money is gone, you’ll never see it again!” :eek:

Nice- Cindy, how about, I’m so sorry my daughter stole from you- I’ll make sure you get that money back! :furious::furious:
 
I agree, but I'm hoping that it was during a period when everyone else can be accounted for...you know the people who had real jobs! Let's hope LE has been able to nail that down.

Not that I believe all of what LA has to say but....didnt he say when he went to TL apt he saw KC's laptop on the table but it had crashed? Also, he said he saw another computer in the apt. I know he said the laptop was his mothers but KC used it.
 
So Lee's man purse we saw him with on the news was actually Casey's and he hijacked it. Ha.
 
Not that I believe all of what LA has to say but....didnt he say when he went to TL apt he saw KC's laptop on the table but it had crashed? Also, he said he saw another computer in the apt. I know he said the laptop was his mothers but KC used it.

How could KC's laptop have been in TL's apartment on 7/16 when it was found in her abandoned car and taken by LE as evidence at that time? Am I missing something?
 
What trouble me most about LA interview. The car. The smell. WAVES of it the minute you walked in the garage. LA was put out there with KC at one point and he couldn't handle it - had to keep stepping out "for fresh air". Well, LE was there - all night - coming and going - questioning - etc. etc. Didn't ANY of LE go out in THAT garage and smell THAT SMELL? Why was there such a delay in impounding that car? when LE is called to a "crime scene" or to a "report" - they are usually all over - swarming like bugs. Even Detectives were out there that night, later on. Yet, NO ONE went in that garage - NO ONE said "hey come here - do you smell that?" "Where is that smell coming from?" Just ain't fittin' with me somewhere.

ME TOO! :furious: I hate to point fingers but given hind sight I feel that maybe they'd like to do a few things differently. I just pray that they have enough to build an air tight case :behindbar:behindbar for head case, I mean Casey. :furious:
 
What was the card that one of the police officer's swiped from Casey's wallet? Maybe something incriminating to an officer? Or someone else's ID?

Might have been how they found out about her relationship with that LE officer who lost his job. Might have been his card.
 
How could KC's laptop have been in TL's apartment on 7/16 when it was found in her abandoned car and taken by LE as evidence at that time? Am I missing something?
Do you remember where you saw that it was located in the car? Please link if possible.
 
Oh ITA, did you catch -in Amy's intv when Cindy said “honey, that money is gone, you’ll never see it again!” :eek:

Nice- Cindy, how about, I’m so sorry my daughter stole from you- I’ll make sure you get that money back! :furious::furious:

Welllll....I don't thnk it was CA's responsibility to pay that debt for Casey. That was Casey's debt, not CA's.
 
Do you remember where you saw that it was located in the car? Please link if possible.

I believe I read it on a list of items that were taken as evidence from the A's residence or from the car. I will look for it. Does anyone recall reading that or am I mistaken?
 
Welllll....I don't thnk it was CA's responsibility to pay that debt for Casey. That was Casey's debt, not CA's.
This is true, however CA's comment to Amy was IMO obnoxious. First here is a girl helping you locate your daughter, who just told you that your daughter has stolen from her. My response would have been, I am so sorry to hear that, she has stolen from us all. Or something along that line. Not “honey, that money is gone, you’ll never see it again!” It just gives me more insight to CA character. Along with LA saying she took the money in KC's wallet and put it in her pocket. She knew that was probably Amy's money. This family is bizarre beyond belief IMO.
 
I believe I read it on a list of items that were taken as evidence from the A's residence or from the car. I will look for it. Does anyone recall reading that or am I mistaken?

I remember that too. It was in a document talking about Caylee's doll being in the car along with other items that were retrieved. Hmmm...
 
I believe I read it on a list of items that were taken as evidence from the A's residence or from the car. I will look for it. Does anyone recall reading that or am I mistaken?

The laptop was turned over to LE at the same time that the items found in the car were turned over. It is in the first set of documents released. Does not state that the laptop was in the car. The confusion lies in that the laptop was turned over at the same time contents of the car were.
 
How could KC's laptop have been in TL's apartment on 7/16 when it was found in her abandoned car and taken by LE as evidence at that time? Am I missing something?

That was discussed in another thread last week. I believe the only things found in the car were diapers, car seat, Caylee's baby and KC's purse. The computer was not in the car.
 
The laptop was turned over to LE at the same time that the items found in the car were turned over. It is in the first set of documents released. Does not state that the laptop was in the car. The confusion lies in that the laptop was turned over at the same time contents of the car were.

Correct!
 
The laptop was turned over to LE at the same time that the items found in the car were turned over. It is in the first set of documents released. Does not state that the laptop was in the car. The confusion lies in that the laptop was turned over at the same time contents of the car were.

That may be what I am recalling. Thanks for the clarification. Too much information to take in!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
220
Guests online
626
Total visitors
846

Forum statistics

Threads
627,117
Messages
18,539,002
Members
241,193
Latest member
karmic14U
Back
Top