Reports of a new, high profile lawyer contacted to take over the case.
http://www.wftv.com/news/17382107/detail.html
http://www.wftv.com/news/17382107/detail.html
I was just watching a local Boston news show called Broadside with Jim Braude. He interviewed attorney Wendy Murphy (and frequent Nancy Grace guest) who claimed that Casey was offered immunity (months ago) but she declined it. Murphy's theory is that Casey offered up Caylee for childand an outside person killed her. Murphy also claims the prosecutors know Casey didn't have anything to do with Caylee's murder.
I thought I had seen everything about this case. Was Casey offered immunity or, as I suspect, is Murphy completely confused?
I was just watching a local Boston news show called Broadside with Jim Braude. He interviewed attorney Wendy Murphy (and frequent Nancy Grace guest) who claimed that Casey was offered immunity (months ago) but she declined it. Murphy's theory is that Casey offered up Caylee for childand an outside person killed her. Murphy also claims the prosecutors know Casey didn't have anything to do with Caylee's murder.
I thought I had seen everything about this case. Was Casey offered immunity or, as I suspect, is Murphy completely confused?
I was just watching a local Boston news show called Broadside with Jim Braude. He interviewed attorney Wendy Murphy (and frequent Nancy Grace guest) who claimed that Casey was offered immunity (months ago) but she declined it. Murphy's theory is that Casey offered up Caylee for childand an outside person killed her. Murphy also claims the prosecutors know Casey didn't have anything to do with Caylee's murder.
I thought I had seen everything about this case. Was Casey offered immunity or, as I suspect, is Murphy completely confused?
I was just watching a local Boston news show called Broadside with Jim Braude. He interviewed attorney Wendy Murphy (and frequent Nancy Grace guest) who claimed that Casey was offered immunity (months ago) but she declined it. Murphy's theory is that Casey offered up Caylee for childand an outside person killed her. Murphy also claims the prosecutors know Casey didn't have anything to do with Caylee's murder.
I thought I had seen everything about this case. Was Casey offered immunity or, as I suspect, is Murphy completely confused?
I don't know about the immunity, but I for one do not think Murphy's theory is outside the realm of the possible. I have read that pedophiles sedate or chloroform their victims. And money would be a motive. I am just wondering, if Casey is evil enough to kill her child in the minds of many, why not also evil enough to be involved in something like this? Not saying it is the best theory, but it would be an "accident" born of felony negligence and abuse which would have to be covered up. If there is any truth in Casey being sexually abused as a youngster, the urge to repeat abuse with one's own child would be present. Stranger things have occurred. And she would be even more culpable in this scenario.I was just watching a local Boston news show called Broadside with Jim Braude. He interviewed attorney Wendy Murphy (and frequent Nancy Grace guest) who claimed that Casey was offered immunity (months ago) but she declined it. Murphy's theory is that Casey offered up Caylee for childand an outside person killed her. Murphy also claims the prosecutors know Casey didn't have anything to do with Caylee's murder.
I thought I had seen everything about this case. Was Casey offered immunity or, as I suspect, is Murphy completely confused?
The cheese done slid off Ms. Murphy's cracker! Wow! Just wow!
I don't know about the immunity, but I for one do not think Murphy's theory is outside the realm of the possible. I have read that pedophiles sedate or chloroform their victims. And money would be a motive. I am just wondering, if Casey is evil enough to kill her child in the minds of many, why not also evil enough to be involved in something like this? Not saying it is the best theory, but it would be an "accident" born of felony negligence and abuse which would have to be covered up. If there is any truth in Casey being sexually abused as a youngster, the urge to repeat abuse with one's own child would be present. Stranger things have occurred. And she would be even more culpable in this scenario.
This trial has taught me to not trust anything "experts" say on TV, whereas before I probably would have..after all, they're experts.
Yes, the reverse speech is spooky; don't know either if I believe in it. Well, I would be assuming Casey disposed of the poor child, using the trunk, and the duct tape for staging. This, to my thinking, would be even worse than what most assume actually happened. Because the crime would be even more heinous.Why is it that Casey's trunk smells like death then? The cadaver dog hits in the back yard? Did Casey provide the killers with the rare Henkel duct tape? Just makes no sense, to me.
You know, this reminded me... I found a site that is about the study of "reverse speech" and of course the proponent of it thinks that reverse speech can be used to find out all sorts of things... it's supposedly the subconscious speaking. In any case, on this site, they have some reverse recordings of some of Casey's interviews, jail visits, etc. And a couple of times she says "boys did this". Strange, huh? Not saying I believe in this stuff, though!! It actually creeped me out quite a bit, and I'm not sure why. It's just that reverse speech sound really spooky/demonic to me.