http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2009/4/7/caseys_reaction_to_body_discovery_accidentally_leaked.html
'The defense did not want the recordings to be released, and requested a judge to rule them private. No ruling had been made before Monday’s accidental release.
'The judge was expected to rule on the audio files May 7.'
and
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/19116201/detail.html
'Anthony's attorney, Jose Baez, filed a motion weeks ago, asking the judge in the case to block the release of the interviews. The judge has yet to rule on the motion, and in an e-mail sent Monday afternoon, the state attorney's office acknowledged that it inadvertently included the interviews among a mountain of other evidence that was released earlier in the day.'
So, how did JB ask for a rulling without filing the appropriate motion? Not arguing....just asking??
I just don't think JBaez knows how to do certain things and, as a practical matter, the substance of what he wants may be to suppress -or, since he likely now knows he screwed up the pleading (again) he'll try to fashion out an appropriate argument supporting what he did wrote and file, but he hasn't said such, and although an incorrect title on a pleading shouldn't operate to bar what's being sought if what's being sought is legal/appropriate, JBaez's various filings don't mention the appropriate law.
Not to mention that all of the foregoing had to do with the release to the public - NOT suppression for use by the SA at a trial or hearing.