2009.03.03 GA suicide note

Yeah. That whole "They want to embarrass George," makes no sense. Sounds like Brad is just adding some special grief stickers...

"Special" or "Extra Special" ? You know we're working on the copyright for the latter. We've got gift bags on the production line right now. Let me know ASAP so I can alert our attorneys.
 
I wonder if he wrote something to the effect of, I can not testify against my daughter truthfully, because if I do I will be partly reponsible for her prison sentence... I don't think I could live with that.
I just wonder if something like that was written...
 
I have always wished they had different attorney's and wished GA would have split off and stayed with MN.

My bet is CA is still calling the shots, especially with BC. I noted even in yesterday's hearing that it seemed as if all discussion was between CA & BC, not BC and GA.

or with CA and GA

ITA with the entire post, George needs his own attorney.
 
I don't think there will be any smoking gun such as what you mentioned. However, the rules of discovery are the issue here.

With the pictures, JB wanted the prosecution to edit the photos on the "filtered" disc and include in discovery only those they wanted to include in the prosecution. If the prosecution did that, the edited photos not in discovery would stand no chance to be used in the trial.

The Florida Sunshine laws have very few exceptions. For example, the images of Caylee's remains are an exception to the rule and would never be included in the publicly available documents.

If the letter goes into discovery for possible use in the trial, it has to be made public.

If the judge grants Conway's motion, the document can not be used at trial, even if it contains evidence beneficial to the prosecution.

Thank You so much for clearing this up for me.
 
I wonder if he wrote something to the effect of, I can not testify against my daughter truthfully, because if I do I will be partly reponsible for her prison sentence... I don't think I could live with that.
I just wonder if something like that was written...

OK----so if he wrote that--well, what if he did-------what does it mean to the trial---depos---please help me. Am hanging onto a ceiling fan blade here and somebody is fixin to turn on the fan
 
Yes, I totally agree with you on this. I wish they would leave this out. It is just too personal.

-----------------------
Amen to that. I think G. was at the end of his rope and deserves some privacy.
 
As a family member of two people who committed suicide (my father and my sister), I agree--this suicide note should be kept private UNLESS it pertains directly to the investigation into little Caylee's murder.

My father did not leave a note, but my sister left four notes--one to her husband, one to each of her two daughters and the other "To Whom It May Concern," presumably for law enforcement. To this day (she died this past September), I do not know what any of those notes said. It is none of my business, as none of them were directed to me.

That said, I do wonder if this suicide note that George wrote might contain information that would shed light on the big family secret that everyone seems so intent on keeping secret. You know, the one where Casey states, "Don't worry, I haven't said anything."

I agree with you,it should stay private. I have the note my brother left me and I have let one person read it. Outside of that it's no one else's business
 
Well, since I feel this family will go to any and all lengths to admonish their wayward daughter and also quash any family secrets, I am of the opinion, or better yet, I have not been convinced this wasn't a staged slight-of-hand on the A's part. If I happen to be correct on this assumption, I am more than willing to forego the A's presumed Right to Privacy.

I want to know what is in that note!
 
Well, since I feel this family will go to any and all lengths to admonish their wayward daughter and also quash any family secrets, I am of the opinion, or better yet, I have not been convinced this wasn't a staged slight-of-hand on the A's part. If I happen to be correct on this assumption, I am more than willing to forego the A's presumed Right to Privacy.

I want to know what is in that note!

LMAO--------OK--so do I.
 
I don't think there will be any smoking gun such as what you mentioned. However, the rules of discovery are the issue here.

With the pictures, JB wanted the prosecution to edit the photos on the "filtered" disc and include in discovery only those they wanted to include in the prosecution. If the prosecution did that, the edited photos not in discovery would stand no chance to be used in the trial.

The Florida Sunshine laws have very few exceptions. For example, the images of Caylee's remains are an exception to the rule and would never be included in the publicly available documents.

If the letter goes into discovery for possible use in the trial, it has to be made public.

If the judge grants Conway's motion, the document can not be used at trial, even if it contains evidence beneficial to the prosecution.

Well then, now I am puzzled as to why the ASA said that they "have no dog in this fight" when it came to the photos. It was the attorney for the Sentinel that launched a defense to the motion stating that Baez had not shown that the photos constitute a clear and immediate threat to Casey's right to a fair trial, paraphrasing. If the issue was that any photos excluded by the judge would not be entered into evidence, I assume they would have put up a fight of some kind. :waitasec:
 
I completely agree. But I also want to say that I'm really fed up with hearing from BC about George and Cindy's ongoing legal demands, requirments, stipulations. They wouldn't take polygraphs, they stopped working with LE early on but attacked LE relentlessly until Dec. 11th. They've brazenly lied, and subverted and obstructed justice for Caylee at every turn--including, as we've just discovered--not informing LE of KC's revised story about the Blanchard Park abduction. Now, the court has to take time to rule on an 8 page "suicide" note, written by GA who evidently hadn't ingested anything stronger than a few beers, and who was found at the motel during a frantic search and rescue effort, conducted by LE at taxpapers expense.

Leave it to you!! :clap::clap::clap:
 
I'll try to answer your last question. If GA is having mental health issues, then his testimony is questionable in a deposition or in a court of law. We have no idea what GA said before the GJ. He may have said that KC was golden, not one bad word about her, may have lied his ears off , but they indited anyway, or he may have told of all the facts he knew against KC. We do not what he testified to, but I bet CA and BC do and this whole suicide idea may have been staged to taint existing testimony or prevent further testimony.
Very interesting!! :bow:
 
If it has anything remotely to do with his violently murdered granddaughter, it should be released. Personally if there's a smidge of anything with respect to KC or Caylee, it should be handed over to the judge at trial!
 
I understand why LE and the SA needed to review this note for any evidence. I'm fully confident in their ability to assess whether or not the note holds any potential evidence. I don't want to see the note if they determine it doesn't. I hope if it doesn't, that the judge will rule to keep it private.

Suicide notes are written at times of great pain, and whatever I may think of George, I still feel for him, and do not want that wound of his opened to the public. It just seems to cross a line that shouldn't be crossed.
 
I don't recall hearing about GA telling a friend of his in LE, but I do recall him discussing the strain of keeping up with the front.

I can't recall where or in which thread we discussed that, either.

Anyone?

I remember hearing this from LP.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
400
Total visitors
532

Forum statistics

Threads
625,801
Messages
18,510,416
Members
240,846
Latest member
Hoppy75
Back
Top