Police acknowledged that the search that began Friday found no evidence that will help find 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, who disappeared June 26 while walking home from a friend's house.
Is it fact that LE found "no evidence" that will help?
Police acknowledged that the search that began Friday found no evidence that will help find 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, who disappeared June 26 while walking home from a friend's house.
:woohoo:
It's now a mater of public record, correct? Can we discuss it now?
Is it fact that LE found "no evidence" that will help?
Is it odd that the items taken were posted on another forum with explanations? Or is this something that is usually done? I am trying to think about what I would do if it were my home that was searched and I don't think I would be saying a word about anything unoffically on the internet. JMO.
Looks like fair game to me. We probably have to be careful about any info posted on the site linked in the media article?
Salem
I want to know why they are looking for Lindsey's bathing suit if she showered before she went to her friend's house. Do 11-year old girls generally put their dirty suit back on after they shower? I really think that is weird!
I want to know if Lindsey's DNA is on those condoms also. Who leaves used condoms laying around?
From the family's comments, it doesn't sound like the computers will be of any value, but they are worth checking. Also the receipts and paperwork may provide some useful clue about what the POI was doing on the days surrounding Lindsey's disappearance.
Salem
:woohoo:
It's now a mater of public record, correct? Can we discuss it now?
I would be very wary of a homeowner's "explanation" of items in a search warrant.
I'd also like to point out that the copy of the search warrant posted did not come out very well, and the identification of many of the items are from the poster, not the actual copies of the search warrant.
I think this is a very important point. As always, we need to be aware of the sources of information, and to keep in mind that people sometimes try to "spin" information to appear favorable to themselves and their goals. Good to take everything with large grains of salt.I would be very wary of a homeowner's "explanation" of items in a search warrant.
I'd also like to point out that the copy of the search warrant posted did not come out very well, and the identification of many of the items are from the poster, not the actual copies of the search warrant.
It might be interesting to make a record of the items listed by the poster as being on the search warrant so they can be compared to the items that are actually on the search warrant, when we see an official copy.
So y'all are discussing a COPY? Not the actual? Let's get the actual copy. I don't agree w/discussing someone elses 'notes'. If it is public, you sleuthers find it and let's get it up. Let me know if you need help posting.