2010.01.15 Letter to Judge Strickland WFTV

[JBean]

Reminder
Unless a child is a murder victim or is a missing youngster ,please do not post pictures of minors.

 

[abbra]

Baez and Company have been pulling " names" of Caylees killer from their magic hats since Missie KC refuses to admit she is her daughters murderer. Reasonable doubt is planted into the heads of potential soon to be jurors and Baez and Co. hope they can get their girl off with even a slap on the wrist and a lighter prison sentence. The time KC is serving now can be used as time already served making her sentence shorter. Bogus Letters to the judge- more smokescreens by the A's, Baez or others, have to be investigated, are a waste of taxpayer dollars and frankly an insult to the intelligence of the judge on the case and to we taxpayers.
The evidence in this case is clear no matter how the Casey camp tries to spin it. All roads lead to KC as the murderer of her daughter Caylee. Almost all of the users here will agree. We have all gone over every bit of public released information of evidence in this case and have dissected it to the best of our abilities. We have waded though KC's bullshyte looking for any scrap of evidence that would exhonerate her from this heinous crime but we have found none because their is none.
" From the GETGO" Casey has lied continually to anyone who will listen to her. Her stories are constantly changing since the time she first admitted to her mother that Caylee was missing.
No letters, no new tales told by kc, her attorneys and family will hold in a court of law. There will be justice for little Caylee when the guilty verdict is read.
Have faith everyone. The Lord works in mysterious ways and what goes around comes around.

 

[abbra]

Hey JBean, longtime no see. Can you tell I am tired and a little cranky plus I have eye strain problems that don't help. Anyway good to see you here policeing the forum. Hope you had Happy Holidays. Abs.

 

[Zoe Bogart]

And just in case any fingers were pointed in my direction, I can assure you that it wasn't me. If I were ever to write a letter to JSS it would read something like this:

' Dear JSS, I have a teensy bit of a crush on you. While everyone else keeps their gazed fixed on KC during a hearing, mine is set on you.
<3 BWI'

I, too, admit to watching the Judge more than anyone else. I love the exasperated look on his face when the defense attorneys are giving their long-winded spiels.

 

[autumnlover]

I, too, admit to watching the Judge more than anyone else. I love the exasperated look on his face when the defense attorneys are giving their long-winded spiels.

Me, too! He is incredibly classy and elegant. I'm definitely a tad infatuated with him.

 

[3doglady]

I, too, admit to watching the Judge more than anyone else. I love the exasperated look on his face when the defense attorneys are giving their long-winded spiels.

I'm in the same club. I often hit replay during the hearings just to catch his reactions again. Sometimes he reacts for a second before he catches himself.

 

[sleutherontheside]

Oh my............this is starting to remind me of the "Win a Date with Muzikman" errrrr I mean the Thank You Muzikman thread. HaHa BTW...he knows I called it that.

 

[Kentjbkent]

Okay, I will admit it...

He had me after the "sitting on a rainbow".....comment

 

[Zoe Bogart]

Snipped from the link:
"Hair can get a band on it for other reasons & not just post-mortem such as being in the car a long time exposed to heat, light, or contaminants, and chloroform DOES definitely form from degrading or mixing antibacterial cleaning products which Cindy used in the car (there are many published studies that confirm this)."

OK guys, I know that the letter was VERY poorly written... but I can't help but notice that some of the author's statements contradict the "stories" that the A's have been telling. For example, they're saying that Cindy used "antibacterial cleaning products" in the trunk of the car. IIRC, (and PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong) the only thing Cindy would admit to was removing and/or washing the pants and shoes.
When they say that there are "many published studies that confirm this", I'm not quite sure what the "this" is.... Are there studies to confirm that chloroform is produced when cleaning products degrade? Are there studies to confirm that death bands are formed under certain environmental conditions? Are there studies that confirm the presence of "antibacterial cleaning products which Cindy used in the car"?? Based on the sentence structure, it sounds like the studies they're refrencing confirm that Cindy was using cleaning products in the car.... but surely this can't be what they meant....???
Goodness gracious....I could go ON and ON....we've got our work cut out for us if we're going to try analyzing (or understanding) the letter or the author's posts!
So far, I have selected ONE sentence from the Sep.11 post (assuming it was written by the author of the letter) and I've written TWO whole paragraphs in an attempt to figure out what the heck they're trying to say. "Anthony-esque" is a good word to describe this style of writing... the dead give aways are the run-on sentences and the failed attempt to sound intelligent. :banghead:

I think you've discovered the writer/writers know how to spin. We know one or two or three peeps who've been spinning their words since July 2008. Could it be the same group?

"Anthony-esque". Perfect.


Your sig says it all :clap: - definitely one of my largest pet peeves:

by DogMom2JoeAndWillie:

You can say "I saw it" or you can say "I have seen it", but please don't say "I seen it" because it's wrong and makes you sound ignorant! C'mon peeps, I live in ARKANSAS...can't get much more backward and country...and don't even use such bad grammar!

I seen it. :banghead:


Back to the judge, I loved him when he told Defense Attorneys they wanted him to reinvent the wheel in relation to dropping KC's death penalty charges, in other words, Defense expected the Judge to rewrite Florida state law right then and there just for KC. sigh

 

[Zoe Bogart]

Baez and Company have been pulling " names" of Caylees killer from their magic hats since Missie KC refuses to admit she is her daughters murderer. Reasonable doubt is planted into the heads of potential soon to be jurors and Baez and Co. hope they can get their girl off with even a slap on the wrist and a lighter prison sentence. The time KC is serving now can be used as time already served making her sentence shorter. Bogus Letters to the judge- more smokescreens by the A's, Baez or others, have to be investigated, are a waste of taxpayer dollars and frankly an insult to the intelligence of the judge on the case and to we taxpayers.
The evidence in this case is clear no matter how the Casey camp tries to spin it. All roads lead to KC as the murderer of her daughter Caylee. Almost all of the users here will agree. We have all gone over every bit of public released information of evidence in this case and have dissected it to the best of our abilities. We have waded though KC's bullshyte looking for any scrap of evidence that would exhonerate her from this heinous crime but we have found none because their is none.
" From the GETGO" Casey has lied continually to anyone who will listen to her. Her stories are constantly changing since the time she first admitted to her mother that Caylee was missing.
No letters, no new tales told by kc, her attorneys and family will hold in a court of law. There will be justice for little Caylee when the guilty verdict is read.
Have faith everyone. The Lord works in mysterious ways and what goes around comes around.

How true! If professional detectives couldn't find evidence in favor of KC's innocence, and we amateurs couldn't find any, how could anyone think a person who's afraid to sign his/her own name to a letter of accusations and "biologically-sound proof" be able to clean her? This has dragged on for 18 months and NO ONE has given satisfactory or concrete evidence that KC didn't kill Caylee and that someone else did.

I can't imagine myself as a grieving grandparent trying to free the person who killed my innocent precious granddaughter who couldn't defend herself. I'd truly be ashamed of myself.

 

[Leila]

We all know KC has made up names by mixing first and last names of people she has either met or is aware of. Gloria may actually be the mother of one of KC's classsmates and is perfectly innocent in this case, no connection to KC whatsoever. The others, also, may be people KC was aware of but did not actually know. So why would LE feel obligated to explain to John Q. Public who these people are and that they have no connection to KC. These people have a right to privacy if they have proven to LE that they are not involved in any way.

KC lied with no regard for the innocence of others and because KC no longer has a voice her family has taken up where KC left off. There is no credibility here. They just keep spinning and spinning. Do they not see why KC is the way she is? I still am appauled at CA's behavior at Morgan deposition. If the family is behind this letter....they still just don't get it as they are doing more harm than good. Hopefully the fraud trial will be a wake up call. JMO

I couldn't agree more.............CA's behavior at that deposition was deplorable! She should be ashamed of the way she behaved.

 

[ThommyMac]

I couldn't agree more.............CA's behavior at that deposition was deplorable! She should be ashamed of the way she behaved.

That was an 'ah ha' moment for me. I knew right then and there, in me heart, that the 'kidnapping' story was kept up and continually pushed for more than just family 'face saving', if you know what I mean. :furious: I truly enjoy the benefits of being a WS member, so I am just going to let it go at that. :angel:
This ridiculous 'letter' will just be another side-note in the circus. How about producing the 'script' that Zanny gave KC in JBP? Do that, team Anthony, and maybe I will think a little differently. Just don't let it be from an old email on KC's machine :sarcasm:

 

[debbie0604]

I think you've discovered the writer/writers know how to spin. We know one or two or three peeps who've been spinning their words since July 2008. Could it be the same group?

"Anthony-esque". Perfect.


Your sig says it all :clap: - definitely one of my largest pet peeves:

I seen it. :banghead:


Back to the judge, I loved him when he told Defense Attorneys they wanted him to reinvent the wheel in relation to dropping KC's death penalty charges, in other words, Defense expected the Judge to rewrite Florida state law right then and there just for KC. sigh

"I seen it" :floorlaugh: I have to laugh....

I live in GA and this is the deep south. Sometimes I will hear someone say that, and it sounds so country, that I laugh to myself. Fortunately I was brought up to use proper grammar. Most people that live here in the ATL area use proper english as well, but once in a while we may hear someone say something like "I seen it" or "I ain't done it"...etc. and to me it's kind of funny. It's just so off-key....

I like JSS too. So far, he seems to be very fair... and I also love watching his reactions in court.

 

[MyTinkieGirl]

It was a link to a thesis in pdf-format, right? Academic papers are often published on the Internet, which is convenient for other researchers, for example. It`s polite to provide a link where you can check the information yourself.

Now I don`t know if the writer of that letter is honest about their profession (don`t know anything about death rings on hair), and what in that letter is garbage.

Edit. Ok, it`s a Master`s thesis from Louisiana State University (http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01242005-145140/), from their electronic thesis and dissertation collection. I wonder if it`s too much to say "NO WAY possible that there was any DEATH HAIR belonging to Caylee Anthony with a black post-morten ring found in Casey Anthony`s car ", based on that thesis alone.

Yep...you're exactly correct....I read the thesis last nite....rather interesting, but, IF I was reading it correctly, it had a lot of "could" and "can" type of conclusions and "suppositions" drawn from many different researchers. The author said it wasn't an EXACT representation due to the hair samples and the different conditions they were subject to....that other sources, she was sighting, did so under "controlled" environments and basically concluded it was an area where FURTHER research should be done to possibly use it as a tool for PMI determinations. Also....it mentioned "hair color" as an issue....that banding may be next to impossible to be seen in some hair AND as far as I read, maybe wrong, but there was no real statements about the "90 day" or "30 day" death band formation the letter writer put forth. It was a thesis, it's NOT supposed to be a qualifier for a Nobel Prize in science. Again...all IMO.

 

[LambChop]

The banding reminds me of the pregnancy tests they had years ago. If there was a minus you could still be pregnant but if the plus was there you were definitely pregnant. There is no argument. The hair belonged to either KC or Caylee. Caylee is, indeed, deceased. So any argument against the hair belonging to a deceased person or belonging to Caylee is a matter of "splitting hairs". Pretty uncomplicated and I would guess defense trying to make it appear to be anything other than what it is will not work with a jury.

 

[Gma Kat]

No matter who insinuates themselves into this case (no identification equals no credibility) the jury must get over one fact before getting over any other defense issues: 31 DAYS......need I say more?

 

[chefmom]

No matter who insinuates themselves into this case (no identification equals no credibility) the jury must get over one fact before getting over any other defense issues: 31 DAYS......need I say more?

I am so right there with you on this one, Gma Kat! I mean, seriously! Explain that one, please! I have said from the early stages of this case that no matter what argument JB and Co. make against the evidence, they are NEVER going to be able to explain away the 31 days! Not with "She was afraid for her family." or "She was 'ugly-coping'." Nothing they are going to say is going to make the average citizen, especially a parent, understand why she went 31 days before someone else reported her child missing! Nope! Not gonna happen!

 

[Muzikman]

I just noticed this on the court record, don't know if it's been mentioned:

01/15/2010 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2010-03735 LYON, ANDREA D, Esquire (5.00)
01/15/2010 Transaction Assessment 5.00


Looks like Andrea bought her own copy of the letter! Wonder what she's gonna use that for? :banghead:

And does that mean she was in town last week? Maybe meeting with the SA?

 

[Spangle]

I just noticed this on the court record, don't know if it's been mentioned:

01/15/2010 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2010-03735 LYON, ANDREA D, Esquire (5.00)
01/15/2010 Transaction Assessment 5.00


Looks like Andrea bought her own copy of the letter! Wonder what she's gonna use that for? :banghead:

And does that mean she was in town last week? Maybe meeting with the SA?

Not to bright. She could have gotten a copy of it on-line. :crazy:

 

[LambChop]

I just noticed this on the court record, don't know if it's been mentioned:

01/15/2010 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2010-03735 LYON, ANDREA D, Esquire (5.00)
01/15/2010 Transaction Assessment 5.00


Looks like Andrea bought her own copy of the letter! Wonder what she's gonna use that for? :banghead:

And does that mean she was in town last week? Maybe meeting with the SA?

Do you suppose she needs to grade it???