2010.03.16 Tommy Croslin wants to take a polygraph test to clear his name.

Good thinking Vicki. Did he go in at night? That seems like he would have. Didn't he know the neighbors were away?

He could be a straight up burglar but the stuff he takes seems more like hoarding to me. That is what led me down that path. He took the gun and stowed it. I don't even know if it could be used for shooting..and didn't he have it in a storage area. All the stuff from the neighbors was buried in a closet. It seems odd. He grabbed a soda from a store and just started drinking it with total disregard. Most thieves would hide it, no? With so much addiction going on around there, it is dfficult to label anyone. He just seems to have sticky fingers and not even for stuff he actually needs.
 
Good thinking Vicki. Did he go in at night? That seems like he would have. Didn't he know the neighbors were away?

He could be a straight up burglar but the stuff he takes seems more like hoarding to me. That is what led me down that path. He took the gun and stowed it. I don't even know if it could be used for shooting..and didn't he have it in a storage area. All the stuff from the neighbors was buried in a closet. It seems odd. He grabbed a soda from a store and just started drinking it with total disregard. Most thieves would hide it, no? With so much addiction going on around there, it is dfficult to label anyone. He just seems to have sticky fingers and not even for stuff he actually needs.

According to the police report there were items out in plain sight for anyone in the home to see and report. But they didn't until they were caught. I do not believe stealing is a new thing for Tommy or any of the Croslin's. I am sorry that is just my opinion but I truly feel if they needed something they didn't go to the store like normal folks and get it. They stole it. I DO NOT believe Lyndsy Croslin didn't see the towels in the master bathroom. No way.
from police report: http://www.artharris.com/blog/wp-co...ommy-Croslin-burglary-report-1-2010-577-1.pdf

snip~During the search, several containers of alcohol were located stashed in the top of the master
bedroom closet and numerous folded towels were discovered in the master bedroom bathroom. Though the
firearm was never located in or around the residence it was later learned that all of the bath towels, bottles of
liquor as well as numerous other toiletries
were indeed stolen from the residence at 120 Tyler Street, along with
the stolen shotgun.~ end

Then the next day Lyndsy notified the detective she had been looking around and realized that there was more things in the house that didn't belong to anyone there. snip~ On 21 January 2010, while continuing the investigation of the residential burglary at 120 Tyler Street in Satsuma I
learned from Lindsy Croslin that she had located items at her residence that did not belong to anyone at the
household and she believed her husband, Hank Croslin Jr, had stolen the items and kept them at their
residence.
The items she recognized as not belonging to anyone in the residence was the items listed above as
well as several DVD movies and (4) Gameboy games. Lindsy had already gathered the items and had them
awaiting law enforcement for recovery.
I retrieved the items from the Croslin residence~ end

Then on the 22nd~ On 22 January 2010, I responded back to the area of Tyler Street in hopes of the home owner or designee, at 111
Tyler Street, being able to positively identify any items stolen from the residence. Upon arrival, contact was
made with the key holder for 111 Tyler Street, P Hayes, who identified the toiletries, golf cart battery charger
and blender
as belonging to the residence at 111 Tyler Street. The items were processed for latent prints and
signed over to Hayes, per the home owner, K Paulson.~ end

At least one of his victims were out of town Type of Crime: RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY
Entry Methods: CUT/REMOVED SCREEN
PRIED/JIMMIED DOOR
Suspect's Actions: RANSACKED
Elements: VICTIM POSSIBLY KNOWS SUSPECTS
Point of Entry: GARAGE/PORCH
Point of Exit: SIDE WINDOW
Victim's Location: OUT OF TOWN
notice he went in one way and went out another. Why? Sound familiar? I know I sound cold and accusing, but this is a man who preyed on the people in his community, I read an article that stated his neighbors were relieved when the Croslin's left the neighborhood, the children were afraid of them.


Out of the mouths of babes!
 
<snip>

At least one of his victims were out of town Type of Crime: RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY
Entry Methods: CUT/REMOVED SCREEN
PRIED/JIMMIED DOOR
Suspect's Actions: RANSACKED
Elements: VICTIM POSSIBLY KNOWS SUSPECTS
Point of Entry: GARAGE/PORCH
Point of Exit: SIDE WINDOW
Victim's Location: OUT OF TOWN notice he went in one way and went out another. Why? Sound familiar? I know I sound cold and accusing, but this is a man who preyed on the people in his community, I read an article that stated his neighbors were relieved when the Croslin's left the neighborhood, the children were afraid of them.


Out of the mouths of babes!

So he used two methods for access and egress - but he also left evidence of prying open the door and removing screens. That didn't happen at 202 Green Lane.
 
Sorry, but I don't buy it. Misty is the one that noticed the items did not belong to Tommy and Lindsy. She turned Tommy in. It sounds more like the items were planted at the house. The stolen items were found in an outdoor shed, in closets, and such. Some of the items were just stupid. Scrub pads, dish detergent. What thief steals this stuff? Why not take things you can pawn, like TV's, microwaves, radios, sound systems, computers. The only thing of value would have been the gun, and who likes guns? Funny how that was the only item not found. And who in the world breaks in one way, and breaks out another way? This man was out of town, it's not like he had to escape our the back door, because some one was coming. I think whoever did it, wanted the owner to be very aware he had been robbed. This guy never reported it, LE approached him! If the other robbery took place while the owner was in bed, I never read that. This just reminds me of the "gun in the culvert" story. I don't know who did the B and E's, but it just seems too much like a set up to me. I know there were video games that Lindsy found, but if they were stolen for the children, or for Tommy, why weren't they in plan sight? Did the games even fit their system? I need more information before I'm willing to believe Tommy did the B and E's. Honestly, I'm not sure he stole the gun from the blind man. Funny how Mama is the one that was charged with the stolen checks. She and Hank Sr. returned the gun, and said Tommy was the one that did it. Didn't they do this to keep him from pressing charges, and then the stolen checks started showing up? Maybe he's guilty of everything! Maybe he's not.
 
So he used two methods for access and egress - but he also left evidence of prying open the door and removing screens. That didn't happen at 202 Green Lane.

JMO but I really don't feel we have all the details about what happened at 202 Green Lane on the night of February 9th 2009. We never heard a peep about the front door, not a word. I find that disturbing. Everyone was so focused on that back door and the cinder block, yet Law Enforcement considered the back door of so little importance that they neglected to take it into evidence until weeks after Haleigh went missing. :waitasec:
 
I left out one huge clue. LP asked Lindsy if Tommy had a scar on one of his fingers. She said he did not. She asked tommy this question, and he said he did not. Sounds like a fingerprint was lifted somewhere that does not match Tommy's. Now, we need to know who does have a scar on one of their fingers!
 
I left out one huge clue. LP asked Lindsy if Tommy had a scar on one of his fingers. She said he did not. She asked tommy this question, and he said he did not. Sounds like a fingerprint was lifted somewhere that does not match Tommy's. Now, we need to know who does have a scar on one of their fingers!


How in the world does LP know details about a scar on the fingerprint? Perhaps there was a cut on the finger at the time of the burglaries, perhaps someone cut themselves while snipping the screen and there was blood recovered.

Hopefully a LDT is coming soon. I don't really know who the thief in the family is, I would like to know. Why would LE charge Tommy with all these crimes without evidence and probable cause? What about the people in Tommy's own neighborhood that witnessed him walking up and down the street in the middle of the night?

snip~I retrieved the items from the Croslin residence and shed in hopes of identifying where the items had been taken
from. Several neighbors on Tyler Street indicated to myself that Hank Croslin Jr, aka Tommy, was often seen
walking up and down the roadways late at night so they believed any other items that were recovered would be
from the immediate area.
As a result of further investigative endeavors I discovered the residence at 111 Tyler
St had its rear screened porch door cut open as well as a rear window pried open and also a broken locking
mechanism from an exterior shed. The residence owner(s), Karen J. Paulsen, was ultimately contacted and
confirmed that the residence had indeed been burglarized.~ end

In my opinion, person's that are violated and become the victim of a crime usually want the person responsible for their pain and loss charged and prosecuted, not just who they suspect, but the person who wronged them.
 
I think this whole gang down there walked around at night. They slept all day and stayed up all night. Even the victim Marvin was a night owl. It may be the climate...don't know.

If Tommy were walking the streets at night, it might not be that odd though. I am curious as to why his sister ratted him out over this. It isn't like she has a conscience and must tell LE about the bad guys.
 
LP finds out information. He is like Columbo...don't underestimate him.
 
Thanks, MARYANN. You are correct. Lindsey ask Hank jr if had a scar on his thumb..at least I think it was the thumb...oh heck, I'll have to listen again..lol
 
I think this whole gang down there walked around at night. They slept all day and stayed up all night. Even the victim Marvin was a night owl. It may be the climate...don't know.

If Tommy were walking the streets at night, it might not be that odd though. I am curious as to why his sister ratted him out over this. It isn't like she has a conscience and must tell LE about the bad guys.

Does Misty "hate" Tommy for some reason? Does anyone believe her when she says he messed with her when they were younger??
 
Thanks, MARYANN. You are correct. Lindsey ask Hank jr if had a scar on his thumb..at least I think it was the thumb...oh heck, I'll have to listen again..lol

I wonder if Ron has a scar on his thumb from the night of Feb.9. The next day his hand did look bruised on the outside, what about the inside? Isn't it kinda unusual to get a scar on your thumb? I don't know, it just seems odd to me. Could someone receive a cut on the thumb from punching through a door? I would think so. And that cut turned into a scar? Just thinking out loud.
 
I just caught the bit about a scar showing up on a finger print. I wonder if one of the cuts Ron had on his hands and thumb the day after Haleigh went missing would show up as a scar on a finger print. Just a thought. The media really zoomed in on his hands during one the interviews that they did of him and his mother and his cell phone started ringing during the interview.
 
Does Misty "hate" Tommy for some reason? Does anyone believe her when she says he messed with her when they were younger??

I can't decide how I lean on that one. I would say I don't believe it, but then I go back to the letter he wrote Lindsy, and he was worried it would make her mad. Since he was offering to take a poly, I've wondered if this would be one of the questions, and he knew he had to tell the truth.

Whisp, I agree with you about staying up late and roaming the streets at night. I can't imagine walking around in plan sight for everyone to see, and being the one to commit the B and E's. It looks to me like you would come closer to lurking in the shadows, to not call attention to yourself.

I'm not sure if this was in the same audio tape, but Tommy also tells Lindsy, that he will beat those charges, because he didn't have anything to do with it. At one point, he tells Lindsy he doesn't know who did it, but it could have been one of Misty's boyfriends. I know that last part was in another tape, but I sure don't want to go looking for it. It took me a couple of hours to find the first one!
 
Does Misty "hate" Tommy for some reason? Does anyone believe her when she says he messed with her when they were younger??
I doubt it. It's just dog eat dog in those circles. Misty is just looking for a fall guy and family is equal opportunity. Best of buds when one or the other scores some pills I bet! Opportunistic addict mentality. I don't think any truly meaningful bonds exist between any of them.
Throw a 5$ bill on the road and they'd fight for it amongst themselves, throw a Vicodin on the road, and watch for blood.

I doubt Tommy will get around to a lie detector test, non-admissable anyways. I don't think he'd pass it. IMO, he also knows something about what happened to Haleigh. So do Ron and Misty.
 
JMO but I really don't feel we have all the details about what happened at 202 Green Lane on the night of February 9th 2009. We never heard a peep about the front door, not a word. I find that disturbing. Everyone was so focused on that back door and the cinder block, yet Law Enforcement considered the back door of so little importance that they neglected to take it into evidence until weeks after Haleigh went missing. :waitasec:

Did they ever take the front door?
 
I tend to agree with the poster earlier about Lisa. Lisa was at Mr Martins and may have had a purse--she could logically hide the checks & the gun easiest. Lisa was charged with purse snatching at Christmas. Hank & Lisa lived in that home as well. Why couldn't she be the one--IMO only a woman would snatch things like towels and dishwashing liquid. Remember MC's VA test--her childhood was awful. Raised by two drug addicts who were constantly on the move. I tend to think that thievery has been going on for years and mama for sure has become very good at it. Maybe her thumb should be checked for a scar instead. And no one squeals on their mama--so maybe Tommy is the family scapegoat.
 
It has taken me this long to find that doggone audio tape with the info about the scar. It was a scar and not a cut. I'm not at home, so I'm on my laptop, and the volume is so low I can barely hear it. I'm sure I hear scar. Somebody weigh in and let me know what you think this means.

http://audio.thesky973.com/m/audio/29737448/tommy-croslin-1-2-9-10-a.htm

Lindsey does ask Tommy if he has a scar on his thumb. She said that "they" had fingerprints of someone with a scar on the thumb. Tommy said that he didn't have a scar on his thumb. I would hope that LE would have verified if Tommy had a scar on his thumb when he was fingerprinted during his arrests in the last year. Hope so, anyway.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
145
Guests online
477
Total visitors
622

Forum statistics

Threads
626,994
Messages
18,536,396
Members
241,163
Latest member
kecalli
Back
Top