Actually, it's the OPPOSITE, I would think. Courts traditionally rule in favor of the mother in custody and other cases, and I would think would rule WORSE if it's a man that has killed his children. Haven't we all been talking about how Casey's youthfulness may play into how she is judged and how some people just can't believe she did this BECAUSE Casey gave birth to Caylee and was her mother (in the loosest sense of the word, I might add). The fact that they only found FOUR cases in the last FIVE years goes even more to prove my point. How many hundreds of cases happen each year? Nice try defense, but this won't work.
This is pure BS. Ironically, we don't even know who Caylee's father is, and the only men in her life have consistently let her down. And wasn't the defense trying to imply Kronk was the one who did it because he's a perv with a duct tape and kiddie fetish? Sorry, but that's not worse than the child's OWN MOTHER killing her because she's not wanted anymore. Feminist, my


*. Casey WISHES she was a feminist instead of a...I won't finish that statement so I don't get banned.
Geez, next thing you know she's going to try to get Gloria Allred as her lawyer. I mean seriously!