- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 48,218
- Reaction score
- 128,402
IMO this is going to be a tricky case to try, particularly if they have limited or no remains to work with. In the absence of a body and/or murder weapon, LE has to build what is essentially a circumstantial case against their suspect.
While not impossible, such a case will hinge on one piece of circumstantial evidence neatly stacked atop the next and so on and so on and so forth til there is a virtual insurmountable pile of circumstantial evidence against the murderer.
These types of cases must be built with painstaking attention to detail and lots of good old fashioned footwork. I, for one, am very happy that LE is keeping mum about what they do and do not have.
This tells me they have their eye on the prize - prison for the perp.
While not impossible, such a case will hinge on one piece of circumstantial evidence neatly stacked atop the next and so on and so on and so forth til there is a virtual insurmountable pile of circumstantial evidence against the murderer.
These types of cases must be built with painstaking attention to detail and lots of good old fashioned footwork. I, for one, am very happy that LE is keeping mum about what they do and do not have.
This tells me they have their eye on the prize - prison for the perp.