The documents show that the As vacuums/steam cleaners were free of any forensic evidence related to this case . If I am correct after perusing everyones responses:
Some people seem to think that they DID clean the car, and that: a) they replaced the equipment b) they cleaned the equipment c) the car was cleaned elsewhere
If any of these are true, then how would that support the decomposition evidence that was found in the trunk?
And if they did not clean the car at all, then why so little decomposition evidence found?
I am thinking this evidence, or non evidence rather, leans more in the favour of the Defense though. I say this because I dont think the As are going to be known so intimately by the jurors as they are here at WS. If anything they will be seen as grieving Grandparents whose Daughter is at risk of death. Because of this, I just dont think the jury will believe that the car was cleaned.
This is of course is just my opinion, and I do wonder if this evidence will even become applicable at trial.
I think Cindy dumped the Vacuum cleaner as soon as she realized what it contained, and bought another from JC Penney.
She was very evasive when directly asked ( and never would agree) to produce the receipts for her purchases there. LE were not just interested in her shopping habits out of idle curiosity.
She was replacing something in her home that would reveal the truth about KC that much was obvious. WE shall find out eventually.