2010.04.29 Motion to Seal Casey's Jail Logs. Why?

WHEREFORE, the Defendant prays this Court enter its Order directing the administration of the Orange County Jail to ensure the confidentiality of all records of whatever description including, but not limited to, sign-in logs regarding contact or visits from any persons with the Defendant herein.

Does this statement in the motion mean that Casey is seeking to keep her commissary orders confidential, in addition to asking to have her visitor logs kept confidential?


BBM.
If the A's or other people wanted to talk to KC by that video system from which we have seen all those tapes showing KC's anger, wouldn't they have to sign in on some sort of a log for that type of contact?
 
Hear, hear affinity! Recognizing a problem and seeking help/ being diagnosed as clinically depressed is something entirely apart from denying potential mental illness and enabling its harmful behaviors. Let the nutz fall where they may. :innocent:.

There are some people in this world who are just evil.
It does not matter to me how she got that way, nature or nurture, she just is and Caylee suffered dreadfully because of it.
 
Yes, I daresay I am one of them*.
I realize that even though you did not quote me that this admonishment is directed at my post. I am sorry that you don't like my characterization about KC's pathology. I have indeed resorting to using an "inappropriate" word for her mental state as I am quite tired of people writing that she is simply "spoiled" and simply full of herself etcetera etcetera. How do they know? Do they know her personally? Are they mental health professionals (and even if they are, have they interviewed KC?)

I suspect that there are those people who just so totally enjoy hating KC they will marginalize and minimize her obvious aberrant mental state. I stand by my statement that there is no one in memory that is as "OUT THERE" (......okay?) as Casey Anthony.

*clinical depression 50+ years, at times major clinical depression. I know quite a lot about it.

But may I say I don't want to put her in with people that really do have a serious mental disorder that they have to live with their whole lives, and they don't kill people. I'm not saying she's not mentally screwed up, but that is no excuse for what she did, and I will be furious if they try to say she's innocent by reason of mental defect. Bulls***.

And you know what, she IS spoiled. Her parents let her live in a fantasy world her whole life where she could as she pleased with no consequences. These are NOT parents that tried everything to HELP their daughter, instead, they let her walk all over them and be their "princess". And when Caylee entered the picture, she wasn't their princess anymore, and Caylee died for that reason. Her parents have a LOT to do with how Caylee's murder came about and they STILL continue to let Casey be their princess despite what she did to Caylee. They have all but forgotten Caylee, moved on, and now it's all about Casey again, just the way she wanted it.

So no, it's not saying she's spoiled and that's it, it IS that's she spoiled and also DOES have some sort of mental problem that was NEVER addressed by her family. Put that all together, and that's STILL not a reason she should walk free. If anything, she needs some serious mental help and a stay in prison the rest of her life.

That being said, they go to the media for everything else, so why are they wanting to hide something now? If they're getting help for Casey, that can only make them look BETTER. I swear, this defense makes NO SENSE.
 
But may I say I don't want to put her in with people that really do have a serious mental disorder that they have to live with their whole lives, and they don't kill people. I'm not saying she's not mentally screwed up, but that is no excuse for what she did, and I will be furious if they try to say she's innocent by reason of mental defect. Bulls***.

And you know what, she IS spoiled. Her parents let her live in a fantasy world her whole life where she could as she pleased with no consequences. These are NOT parents that tried everything to HELP their daughter, instead, they let her walk all over them and be their "princess". And when Caylee entered the picture, she wasn't their princess anymore, and Caylee died for that reason. Her parents have a LOT to do with how Caylee's murder came about and they STILL continue to let Casey be their princess despite what she did to Caylee. They have all but forgotten Caylee, moved on, and now it's all about Casey again, just the way she wanted it.

So no, it's not saying she's spoiled and that's it, it IS that's she spoiled and also DOES have some sort of mental problem that was NEVER addressed by her family. Put that all together, and that's STILL not a reason she should walk free. If anything, she needs some serious mental help and a stay in prison the rest of her life.

That being said, they go to the media for everything else, so why are they wanting to hide something now? If they're getting help for Casey, that can only make them look BETTER. I swear, this defense makes NO SENSE.

ITA, KC does have a problem. Even if we assume that she is innocent of murdering her daughter, it is impossible to say that her behavior is anything close to that one would expect of a mother whose 2-year-old only child has inexplicably disappeared, only to be found months-dead on the overgrown roadside just down the street from home. Something is definitely broken.
 
^ OT! sorry! Something is definitely broken, which may have something to do with why the defense wants the visitors log sealed. !:innocent:
 
ITA, KC does have a problem. Even if we assume that she is innocent of murdering her daughter, it is impossible to say that her behavior is anything close to that one would expect of a mother whose 2-year-old only child has inexplicably disappeared, only to be found months-dead on the overgrown roadside just down the street from home. Something is definitely broken.

Maybe she never had it in the first place to break!!! I just am so fed up with lenient sentences to mothers who kill their children. We have to start the whole thing about must be sick because mother's love their children so if a mother harmed her child then she must be ill.

I say Hogwash! Some mother's just do not want to be mother's and do not love their children. Aberrations? Maybe. Guilty if they commit murder by killing their children? Absolutely!!!
 
Maybe she never had it in the first place to break!!! I just am so fed up with lenient sentences to mothers who kill their children. We have to start the whole thing about must be sick because mother's love their children so if a mother harmed her child then she must be ill.

I say Hogwash! Some mother's just do not want to be mother's and do not love their children. Aberrations? Maybe. Guilty if they commit murder by killing their children? Absolutely!!!

ITA...I guess I am just assuming what the defense strategy would be when it comes to mitigation. They are hoping for that one juror that just cannot understand KC's actions after Caylee's demise/disappearance. You know, that person that lives in a happy sunshiny world where nothing every happens in their town that believes she is gotta have a screw loose or why else could she have acted in such a way?
 
Maybe she never had it in the first place to break!!! I just am so fed up with lenient sentences to mothers who kill their children. We have to start the whole thing about must be sick because mother's love their children so if a mother harmed her child then she must be ill.

I say Hogwash! Some mother's just do not want to be mother's and do not love their children. Aberrations? Maybe. Guilty if they commit murder by killing their children? Absolutely!!!

I hear you.. The mother "archetype" is key to the way that most of us look at society, let alone to many religions. The very idea of a mother who murders her child is evil squared. Keep in mind that KC is both a young mother to Caylee and a child to Cindy in this case. Don't be surprised if she is portrayed as a hapless girl who was coddled and treated as a child throughout her early adulthood, resulting in an inability to bond with her child.

yep, it's bs. But sometimes that's all you've got. And if you say it right, sometimes it can dazzle 'em. Ask any defense atty.
 
um, which is why the defense wants the jail visitors log sealed.
 
I hear you.. The mother "archetype" is key to the way that most of us look at society, let alone to many religions. The very idea of a mother who murders her child is evil squared. Keep in mind that KC is both a young mother to Caylee and a child to Cindy in this case. Don't be surprised if she is portrayed as a hapless girl who was coddled and treated as a child throughout her early adulthood, resulting in an inability to bond with her child.

yep, it's bs. But sometimes that's all you've got. And if you say it right, sometimes it can dazzle 'em. Ask any defense atty.

I hear you but! Somehow this is something I've got to see. Lyon(s) + Mason + Baez = Dazzle? Huh?
 
good point! no, they are definitely on the "baffle em" end of the scale. Either way, it's bs. imo of course.
 
They want to hide how they will defend Inmate Anthony...could be a slew of psychologists coming to visit to get inside her head.

Could be a person to teach her how to act in the courtroom while cameras catch her every move, facial expression, outrage!

Could be the Anthony's want to visit under the radar!

Could be any number of things but I go with how they choose to defend her, IMO..I'm thinking many psychs will visit her in the days to come...JMHO


Justice for Caylee
 
They want to hide how they will defend Inmate Anthony...could be a slew of psychologists coming to visit to get inside her head.

Could be a person to teach her how to act in the courtroom while cameras catch her every move, facial expression, outrage!

Could be the Anthony's want to visit under the radar!

Could be any number of things but I go with how they choose to defend her, IMO..I'm thinking many psychs will visit her in the days to come...JMHO


Justice for Caylee

I don't think there is anything surprising in thinking that she will be examined by Psychologists, Psychiatrists. That is par for the course. Why would they want to hide that, it doesn't make sense. Will this information get hidden with all prisoners or just for Casey?
 
I don't think there is anything surprising in thinking that she will be examined by Psychologists, Psychiatrists. That is par for the course. Why would they want to hide that, it doesn't make sense. Will this information get hidden with all prisoners or just for Casey?

Just KC....she's the priceless princess, don't you know...:innocent:

It makes sense because Baez doesn't want to tip his hand. He's got to make up something to go along with what TMac said of her innocence..now maybe they have to start buying some clues...JMHO
 
A little hanky panky going on.........IMO

Yeah, maybe Baez wants to start having conjugal visits with her. That's something that he definitely wouldn't want the world to know, lol.
 
BBM.
If the A's or other people wanted to talk to KC by that video system from which we have seen all those tapes showing KC's anger, wouldn't they have to sign in on some sort of a log for that type of contact?

Yes, they would have to sign in just like everyone else does.
Remember, Baez filed a motion to get the Anthony's visits, not taped and get the previous ones destroyed. This motion was denied.
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/20972696/detail.html

RH said there is a big difference between defense visitors and friends and family.
 
The defense seems is going to try to ask for everything Judge Strickland shot down,to be heard , again...and ruled on again. They want the jail records, including the visits sealed. That has been asked and answered now they are trying to word this motion very cleverly that it would be all encompassing. Trouble is...they are not that clever.
The prosecution couldn't give a hoot who visits, we could sit here and guess at list for God's sake! Why hasn't Mason or Lyon or Kenney-Baden told the newbie, Baez that the majority of their plan is quite predictable, and there is no reason to try to secrete the obvious?


I do hope the judge will shoot this down, but if he allows it, it matters very little from what I can tell. I am not a lawyer. The only reason I want it shot down, is that I don't think murdering her baby, and selling photos of her for hundreds of thousands of dollars should get her any special treatment.
I just keep hearing Andrea saying...if you don't like something, file a motion! It is hard to take the defense seriously, even now with Cheney.
The defense wants do overs. This is not nursery school and we are not on Hope Springs Drive Mr. Baez, you are playing with the big kids now.:furious:
PS: At the next hearing Mr. Baez ,please DO bring your file. I don't think this judge is going to stand for the I don't have it, but I can supply it to the court argument when he told you precisely what was to be heard!!
 
And not everyone's case is being broadcast to the public. This case has unique circumstances that justify unique measures.

Not everyone's case is being broadcast to the public because no one is asking for the info, if anyone asked, it would be broadcasted.

The players in this case created the interest, no unique circumstances. The laws that are good enough for everyone else are certainly good enough for the accused child killer.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
77
Guests online
831
Total visitors
908

Forum statistics

Threads
626,038
Messages
18,519,533
Members
240,922
Latest member
sebsleuth
Back
Top