I heard the Bat Call. :rocker:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/38831947/05062010-Motion-to-Reconsider-Prior-Motions
Here is the motion... In my layman's opinion, it is a whiny, jumbled MESS. Somewhat unprofessional. And I believe there IS a difference between being disqualified, and recusing oneself. The name-calling boggles the mind. And they wonder why nobody likes them???? :waitasec:
This is what it asks for, all in one motion:
2. The defense requests reconsideration of the following Motions and rulings by the disqualified Judge as to the factual and legal merits of said Motions and rulings thereon:
A. Defendant's Motion to Compel Production of Tape Recorded Statement of Joe Jordan and the Court's Order on same dated April 7, 2010.
B. Motion for Production of Grand Jury Testimony of George Anthony filed by the state of Florida on September 16, 2009 and joined in by the defense, and the Order of the Court dated October 6,2009.
C. Defendant's Motion to Compel Tips Gathered by Law Enforcement, dated November 4, 2008.
D. The Order on Defendant's Motion to Modify the Court's Order on Defendant's Application for Subpoena Duces Tecum for Documents in the Possession of Texas Equusearch.
If the judge should agree to release it, Mr. Jordan's tape recorded interview ( that he felt compelled he had to record, likely due to being uncomfortable with the defense investigator's questions of him up until then, imo) is going to be a disaster for the defense. Alrighty then.
Likewise, the public release of George's grand jury testimony, if indeed the judge should decide to release it, will be a disaster of biblical proportions, imo. He likely opined that he had experience in LE, and that smell, no question in his mind was human decomposition coming from the trunk. He may have testified that he rarely ever looked up a google of a business phone number,and absolutely was never searching for how to make chloroform on the family computer. With Cindy at work, if his testimony is believed...who does that leave us with? The defendant! He may have testified he has come to understand his daughter lied about many, many things and she had no job, stole from the family, etc. Most importantly George's testimony will reveal that he had never, ever, ever heard of Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzales and never met any would be Zanny the Nanny. Getting his testimony to these exceedingly damaging facts released will seal her fate. Certainly it will be used to illustrate his varying accounts of these matters, and he will have no credibility in front of the civil or criminal jury. Jurors may surmise that parents are lying because they know there are things that point to their daughter's guilt that they are covering up. ( The prosecution was sure to use it to impeach him at the trial, but why get it out there a year earlier? He is her father, for the love of God! Why not go to him, who supports his daughter, and ask him what he said and assume he said the things I am guessing at? One can review his state depo and venture a guess on matters they focused on!)
My favorite Mr. Nejame moment:
— April 05, 2010 — Part 1 -
http://www.wftv.com/video/23056801/in...
Part 2 -
http://www.wftv.com/video/23057236/in...
IMO, one of the main reasons they asked for Judge Strickland to step down was to ask for this particular matter to be heard by a new judge...getting the TES documents , copied and given to them, comprehensive, with CONTACT INFORMATION . They want to do just as they admitted in the recent hearing, investigate the backgrounds of all potential witnesses...loosely translated.... find another SODDI ,or thoroughly harass or impeach any TES volunteer that should take the stand to testify to the fact that not one of them did, or indeed could have, searched the exact area as it was UNDER WATER!!
Clearly, the defense feels they must, must, be in a position to argue the baby's body was placed there after Casey was jailed. These TES records and where they want to go with them is the MOTHER LOAD! [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_paneRGyESE[/ame]
Make no mistake about it.....this is what they have wanted all along. What is that old saying..if you can't get in the front, go around the back? If rulings go against you, cry improper motives, cry prejudice to your client, cry unconstitutional, disparage TES in the public, have Todd, Andrea and Jose argue to the judge on different days that Mr. Nejame has a conflict of interest ( despite the fact that Brad testified to the court that no, that is not true, his clients, MR. and Mrs. Anthony have waived any conflict, IN WRITING,all three times the defense raised the argument.....IN BAD FAITH ), complain again in the press and in court, re word your motions try to argue them again...If all else fails, try to get a new judge and start all over. Judge Strickland could have been judge anybody, it was never about the blogger, imo. They want and need the TES records and he would not cave. The blogger was just something to hang their hat on.
Having the very , very experienced Judge Perry rule on matters ALREADY RULED ON, and do extensive research on , to quote from precedent , on the record..they may as well be waiving her right to appeal. You just can't make this stuff up!!!!!!
.
