2010.05.11 - "The irony is rich!"

  • #121
All the reports are due before the conference so whats the point now. Jeeeesh it`s not fair. :great:

Okay. JB is saying he wants to go to this conference and get his experts together because he has some new information to show them. If you had something new wouldn't you have notified them when you received the info in the first place. Why wait until after their reports are due and you can't use them?

So if you read between the lines "some new information" pretty much sums up the fact that the information the experts have right now will not help KC's case and JB is hoping, hoping what new info he has just come up with will help change their minds. That is what I'm getting from what he said in court on Friday. jmo
 
  • #122
Okay. JB is saying he wants to go to this conference and get his experts together because he has some new information to show them. If you had something new wouldn't you have notified them when you received the info in the first place. Why wait until after their reports are due and you can't use them?

So if you read between the lines "some new information" pretty much sums up the fact that the information the experts have right now will not help KC's case and JB is hoping, hoping what new info he has just come up with will help change their minds. That is what I'm getting from what he said in court on Friday. jmo

Maybe he is gonna bust out his piggy bank and grease some palms.....

Oh wait.......after thinking about it, that would be totally against the law. He wouldn't do THAT!
 
  • #123
All the reports are due before the conference so whats the point now. Jeeeesh it`s not fair. :great:

Yeah............da*m the luck !:floorlaugh:
 
  • #124
How FUNNY would it be if Kathi B decided to attend for the soul reason of keeping tabs on Baez !!!!

Now this one really made me lol! Ah, Kathi B has to be JB's (and CM's) worst nightmare, God love her!

Back on topic: Such irony!
 
  • #125
:twocents:Rich indeed: WHAT NEW information might the great and amazing defense Esquire have up his sleeve that could modify the reports of these two experts: Werner ":hen: " Spitz, M. D. and Kathy " :hot::phone::cat: " Reichs, Ph. D.?


With respect to Caylee and her memory (both of which seem missing from the proceedings lately, IMHO :devil:!), unless he has returned to Suburban Drive and crawled on his hands & knees :biglaugh: sifting thru the silt/dirt/muck & mud and found more bones (remember the recovery TEAM reclaimed ~96% of a 35lb/~3ft child), THAT'S ALL THAT THOSE 2 EXPERTS WITNESSED OF A BIOLOGICAL IMPACT! :banghead:

Did he discover new trace evidence within his office from the inmates's ever present BACKPACK when she was out on bail, or new photos from a throw-away camera or some other hidden discovery :shocked2:that will CHANGE the post mortem reports????:waitasec:

Sticking out my neck here BUT I would not nor do I believe that MANY (ANY?) other practicing forensic pathologists/anthropologists/entomologists, oh HECK, ANY "ISTS" would modify :pcguru: a data report/opinion/document based on the musings of a defense atty.....Nope, not in the real world.
 
  • #126
Maybe Baez will be wondering around with some new fan-dangled GPS system, with the pictures of the people he is stalking in it??

And, just my thoughts here, but I do not believe for ONE MINUTE that he has placed phone calls to ANY of the people that he has claimed.
 
  • #127
Maybe the new information comes from CA. Could JB be asking if they could say with a 100% surety that the bones they examined belonged to Caylee Marie Anthony. If they say no. There you go, reasonable doubt. jmo
 
  • #128
Maybe Baez will be wondering around with some new fan-dangled GPS system, with the pictures of the people he is stalking in it??

And, just my thoughts here, but I do not believe for ONE MINUTE that he has placed phone calls to ANY of the people that he has claimed.

BBM

I don't believe it either. It sounds suspiciously like the phone call that Caylee supposedly made to Casey at noon on July 15 from a private number - no wait it turned into a number that had been disconnected - no wait it was on the Blackjack phone that mysteriously disappeared with all the pertinent numbers stored in it - no wait................. A BUNCH OF LAME MALARKY!!!
 
  • #129
How's this for Irony?

:twocents:Something else interesting: the Court order to ship the shorts & bag dated December 3 indicated that they were to be received & held by a Katherine Cross @ NMS and tested by NME employees, ONLY*. Now, hunting around I discovered that Ms Cross is not a mailroom employee but a real live scientist!:rocker: Not only that she's been around the block and in a courtroom: "Forensic Biologist :rocker: Katherine Cross, who works for NMS Labs in Willow Grove, spoke about blood spatter and DNA....." where she "chatted" about another case!
SO it does appear that some how the defense Esquire :turkey:of record for the inmate could have spoken to the REAL CONTACT PERSON! Why do I "feel" that Ego Jose believes he can only speak to the "top dog"?:beagle:


MAYBE JOSE :werk: WAS CALLING THE WRONG PERSON??????????


*This is IMPORTANT 'cause lots of folks ASSUMED that the Dutch duo (names escape me!) were performing their magic testing on the exemplars SO unless NMS HIRED THEM (get your H1B VISA/ GREEN CARDS HERE!) :truce:, no hands-on services should have been provided!:banghead:


Here's another "wild thought":singing: : maybe JAB wanted the lab to WAIT :treadmill: for the Dutch duo to arrive in the USA to observe/perform the testing SINCE the male member is ON HIS WITNESS LIST!!!! :banghead:
 
  • #130
How's this for Irony?

:twocents:Something else interesting: the Court order to ship the shorts & bag dated December 3 indicated that they were to be received & held by a Katherine Cross @ NMS and tested by NME employees, ONLY*. Now, hunting around I discovered that Ms Cross is not a mailroom employee but a real live scientist!:rocker: Not only that she's been around the block and in a courtroom: "Forensic Biologist :rocker: Katherine Cross, who works for NMS Labs in Willow Grove, spoke about blood spatter and DNA....." where she "chatted" about another case!
SO it does appear that some how the defense Esquire :turkey:of record for the inmate could have spoken to the REAL CONTACT PERSON! Why do I "feel" that Ego Jose believes he can only speak to the "top dog"?:beagle:


MAYBE JOSE :werk: WAS CALLING THE WRONG PERSON??????????


*This is IMPORTANT 'cause lots of folks ASSUMED that the Dutch duo (names escape me!) were performing their magic testing on the exemplars SO unless NMS HIRED THEM (get your H1B VISA/ GREEN CARDS HERE!) :truce:, no hands-on services should have been provided!:banghead:


Here's another "wild thought":singing: : maybe JAB wanted the lab to WAIT :treadmill: for the Dutch duo to arrive in the USA to observe/perform the testing SINCE the male member is ON HIS WITNESS LIST!!!! :banghead:


RBBM. Yes ma'am, I think you got his number. :laughcry:
 
  • #131
All the reports are due before the conference so whats the point now. Jeeeesh it`s not fair. :great:

Baez is being Thwarted at every turn.:floorlaugh:
 
  • #132
Okay. JB is saying he wants to go to this conference and get his experts together because he has some new information to show them. If you had something new wouldn't you have notified them when you received the info in the first place. Why wait until after their reports are due and you can't use them?

So if you read between the lines "some new information" pretty much sums up the fact that the information the experts have right now will not help KC's case and JB is hoping, hoping what new info he has just come up with will help change their minds. That is what I'm getting from what he said in court on Friday. jmo

bbm
Exactly!
He would have called, emailed, texted, faxed, skyped, sent letters and so forth
 
  • #133
:twocents:Rich indeed: WHAT NEW information might the great and amazing defense Esquire have up his sleeve that could modify the reports of these two experts: Werner ":hen: " Spitz, M. D. and Kathy " :hot::phone::cat: " Reichs, Ph. D.?


With respect to Caylee and her memory (both of which seem missing from the proceedings lately, IMHO :devil:!), unless he has returned to Suburban Drive and crawled on his hands & knees :biglaugh: sifting thru the silt/dirt/muck & mud and found more bones (remember the recovery TEAM reclaimed ~96% of a 35lb/~3ft child), THAT'S ALL THAT THOSE 2 EXPERTS WITNESSED OF A BIOLOGICAL IMPACT! :banghead:

Did he discover new trace evidence within his office from the inmates's ever present BACKPACK when she was out on bail, or new photos from a throw-away camera or some other hidden discovery :shocked2:that will CHANGE the post mortem reports????:waitasec:

Sticking out my neck here BUT I would not nor do I believe that MANY (ANY?) other practicing forensic pathologists/anthropologists/entomologists, oh HECK, ANY "ISTS" would modify :pcguru: a data report/opinion/document based on the musings of a defense atty.....Nope, not in the real world.

:yourock:
 
  • #134
How's this for Irony?

:twocents:Something else interesting: the Court order to ship the shorts & bag dated December 3 indicated that they were to be received & held by a Katherine Cross @ NMS and tested by NME employees, ONLY*. Now, hunting around I discovered that Ms Cross is not a mailroom employee but a real live scientist!:rocker: Not only that she's been around the block and in a courtroom: "Forensic Biologist :rocker: Katherine Cross, who works for NMS Labs in Willow Grove, spoke about blood spatter and DNA....." where she "chatted" about another case!
SO it does appear that some how the defense Esquire :turkey:of record for the inmate could have spoken to the REAL CONTACT PERSON! Why do I "feel" that Ego Jose believes he can only speak to the "top dog"?:beagle:


MAYBE JOSE :werk: WAS CALLING THE WRONG PERSON??????????


*This is IMPORTANT 'cause lots of folks ASSUMED that the Dutch duo (names escape me!) were performing their magic testing on the exemplars SO unless NMS HIRED THEM (get your H1B VISA/ GREEN CARDS HERE!) :truce:, no hands-on services should have been provided!:banghead:


Here's another "wild thought":singing: : maybe JAB wanted the lab to WAIT :treadmill: for the Dutch duo to arrive in the USA to observe/perform the testing SINCE the male member is ON HIS WITNESS LIST!!!! :banghead:

Didn't say something to the effect that the Dutch scientist wanted to observe their process? You know, work alongside them, give them some pointers, observe errors in their process. Oh yea, I can see the lab going along with that.
 
  • #135
:twocents:Rich indeed: WHAT NEW information might the great and amazing defense Esquire have up his sleeve that could modify the reports of these two experts: Werner ":hen: " Spitz, M. D. and Kathy " :hot::phone::cat: " Reichs, Ph. D.?


With respect to Caylee and her memory (both of which seem missing from the proceedings lately, IMHO :devil:!), unless he has returned to Suburban Drive and crawled on his hands & knees :biglaugh: sifting thru the silt/dirt/muck & mud and found more bones (remember the recovery TEAM reclaimed ~96% of a 35lb/~3ft child), THAT'S ALL THAT THOSE 2 EXPERTS WITNESSED OF A BIOLOGICAL IMPACT! :banghead:

Did he discover new trace evidence within his office from the inmates's ever present BACKPACK when she was out on bail, or new photos from a throw-away camera or some other hidden discovery :shocked2:that will CHANGE the post mortem reports????:waitasec:

Sticking out my neck here BUT I would not nor do I believe that MANY (ANY?) other practicing forensic pathologists/anthropologists/entomologists, oh HECK, ANY "ISTS" would modify :pcguru: a data report/opinion/document based on the musings of a defense atty.....Nope, not in the real world.



I just keep remembering the questions and remarks JB kept going on with to JP about do the rules apply to the state, being rules of if its not in a depo or report do the same rules apply and what would happen if the state were to forgo their depo, He took a lot of time asking all of this and SA seemed upset and confused by it as did I. I just wonder what JB is up to with all of that. For the life of me it makes no sense to ask and coment all of this unless he is up to something with these depos and reports. why on earth would he even think the state would forgo their depo??? Maybe someone else understands better than I do and can explain.:shakehead:
 
  • #136
How's this for Irony?

:twocents:Something else interesting: the Court order to ship the shorts & bag dated December 3 indicated that they were to be received & held by a Katherine Cross @ NMS and tested by NME employees, ONLY*. Now, hunting around I discovered that Ms Cross is not a mailroom employee but a real live scientist!:rocker: Not only that she's been around the block and in a courtroom: "Forensic Biologist :rocker: Katherine Cross, who works for NMS Labs in Willow Grove, spoke about blood spatter and DNA....." where she "chatted" about another case!
SO it does appear that some how the defense Esquire :turkey:of record for the inmate could have spoken to the REAL CONTACT PERSON! Why do I "feel" that Ego Jose believes he can only speak to the "top dog"?:beagle:


MAYBE JOSE :werk: WAS CALLING THE WRONG PERSON??????????


*This is IMPORTANT 'cause lots of folks ASSUMED that the Dutch duo (names escape me!) were performing their magic testing on the exemplars SO unless NMS HIRED THEM (get your H1B VISA/ GREEN CARDS HERE!) :truce:, no hands-on services should have been provided!:banghead:


Here's another "wild thought":singing: : maybe JAB wanted the lab to WAIT :treadmill: for the Dutch duo to arrive in the USA to observe/perform the testing SINCE the male member is ON HIS WITNESS LIST!!!! :banghead:

bbm
Are they even allowed to "observe" the testing and then render an expert opinion?

You're right Joypath..without an issuance of Visa from USCIS and DHS authorization the E team can not perform ANY work in the US, and iirc that includes pro bono...it doesn't matter if they get paid or not..it's a JOB that one would get paid doing.

They may already have a Visa and work authorization in place that we just are not privy too.
 
  • #137
I just keep remembering the questions and remarks JB kept going on with to JP about do the rules apply to the state, being rules of if its not in a depo or report do the same rules apply and what would happen if the state were to forgo their depo, He took a lot of time asking all of this and SA seemed upset and confused by it as did I. I just wonder what JB is up to with all of that. For the life of me it makes no sense to ask and coment all of this unless he is up to something with these depos and reports. why on earth would he even think the state would forgo their depo??? Maybe someone else understands better than I do and can explain.:shakehead:
That bothered me too and it seemed he was persistent in asking this several different ways. What's up with that?
 
  • #138
How ironic would it be if Kathy Reichs' show "Bones" has an episode that features Dr. Brennan being stalked at a conference by a wacko defense attorney? :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
  • #139
How ironic would it be if Kathy Reichs' show "Bones" has an episode that features Dr. Brennan being stalked at a conference by a wacko defense attorney? :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

I would bet that some day Reichs participation in the Anthony case will make it's way into a script (with some details changed I'm sure :blushing:) for the show Bones.
 
  • #140
Okay. JB is saying he wants to go to this conference and get his experts together because he has some new information to show them. If you had something new wouldn't you have notified them when you received the info in the first place. Why wait until after their reports are due and you can't use them?

So if you read between the lines "some new information" pretty much sums up the fact that the information the experts have right now will not help KC's case and JB is hoping, hoping what new info he has just come up with will help change their minds. That is what I'm getting from what he said in court on Friday. jmo

BBM: I thought he said new information and then changed it to additional information? Either way, here is my theory:

The new/additional information is the material that Dr. Spitz is going to testify to - according to the motion hearing - the mud in the skull, etc. If JB learned about this info recently, perhaps from Dr. Spitz's assistant, he may want to bring this up to both Kathy Reichs, Logan and Rodriguez to see if this might make them write a more favorable report for the defense. I don't think this info will change anything, but JB could be hoping for a miracle.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
2,177
Total visitors
2,261

Forum statistics

Threads
632,863
Messages
18,632,737
Members
243,317
Latest member
Sfebruary
Back
Top