2010.08.05 Document Release

[nums24]

Finally an answer to who Clyde Cole is:

Captain Clyde "Greg" Cole​

​

​

​

​

- Captain Cole, along with his cadaver dogs, assisted in the​

search for Caylee Anthony in September of 2008.


http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2010/0805/24527641.pdf page 20386, or p. 146 on the linked PDF.

Thank you!! I totally missed this!

On a side note, while reading this I came across this, pg 143:

"I really hope the new judge works out. I also thought Judge Strickland was a little biased toward the prosecution."

 

[nums24]

Hey nums! E. Gonzalez was one of the shot girls from Fusian, right? The links in the thread you linked didn't work though. What is the significance of her testimony? My guess is the Gonzalez connection with the nanny.

Start at page 147:

http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2010/0805/24527641.pdf

 

[Tuffy]

I give up. I keep getting errors regardless of site used to view PDFs or links on WS to view them...even the links that have broken them up into smaller pieces of the larger doc. I'm so frushtrated. Thanks to those who've offered up rationale for what the problem is.

Can you open other PDF files? If not, maybe try updating acrobat on your computer.

 

[Tuffy]

Start at page 147:

http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2010/0805/24527641.pdf

 

[tragco]

Thank you!! I totally missed this!

On a side note, while reading this I came across this, pg 143:

"I really hope the new judge works out. I also thought Judge Strickland was a little biased toward the prosecution."

Unbelievable. How can she sit in court and think this? If anything, Strickland went out of his way to assist the defense.

I loved Strickland, and I love Judge Perry. But Perry is hard-nosed, and doesn't think twice about refusing to interpret prior case law in a "shaky ground" kind of way (which the defense loves to do). He rules fairly and quickly. This Judge smacks down those arguments, leading to a "denied, denied, denied" for the defense.

 

[LetJusticePrevail]

I give up. I keep getting errors regardless of site used to view PDFs or links on WS to view them...even the links that have broken them up into smaller pieces of the larger doc. I'm so frushtrated. Thanks to those who've offered up rationale for what the problem is.

Follow Up! If anyone's having similar problems, try another browser. That was the ticket for me. After doing some research, I learned some updated versions of acrobat aren't always 100% compatible with certain browsers. I switched from Firefox to IE and my problems went POOF!

 

[nums24]

Thanks to MuzikMan for getting us this info, this is what will be in the next doc dumps:

07/22/2010 Provision of Discovery

1. CD - Discovery Documents Pages 20141-22672
(Pgs 20152-20385 are Letters to Casey Anthony)
(Pgs 20425-22672 are Dominick Casey Emails)
2. CD - Brandon Sparks Cell Records 2008
3. CD - Orange County Jail Calls RE: Robyn Adams, 12/11/08 - 12/20/08
4. CD - Federal Jail Calls RE: Robyn Adams, 01/27/10 - 41/12/10
5. CD - Statement of Clyde Cole
6. CD - Mandy Albriton Int. Pt. 2 07/02/10
7. CD - Audio of Erica Gonzalez; Kronk work & phone records; transcripts (Lee, Gonzalez, McDonnell, Neally)

BBM - Has anyone come across these? They seem to be missing :waitasec:

 

[drip~drop]

:waitasec: Baez is reviewing Casey's letters as Cindy now sends them to his law firm instead of directly to the jail. Why would Cindy do that? I just don't get it. If they have nothing to hide, why be so sneaky?

Casey tried to call Cindy for Mother's day? I wonder how? Was it from the jail or from Baez's cell phone? Anyone got to that part yet? TIA

Well, ya know how sometimes those unauthorised cell phones fall in to the jails from the sky----right thru the celings too!!!!! Amazing huh??

 

[drip~drop]

Hmmm....
Spencer. Jamil
I=rom:
ent:
To:
Subject:
Sensitivity:
Luke)
D&A Investigations, Inc [[email protected]]
Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1 :12 AM
'Luke Phillips'
RE: News interview
Confidential
Yes I did speak with Ginette around 530 and suggested not to do any further interviews until
she can get phone records and we can present them with mine) then we go public and also
provide to LE. I heard that Ginette went on Nancy Disgrace and they focused on the phone in
an attempt records in an attempt to discredit Ginette. Also Leonard Padilla stated that
Ginette was working with Kronk and me and that is why we both went to the location) what a
scandal monger this guy is. Nancy Disgrace is not a show to be on nor is any other until we
get the phone records taken care of. WFTV 9/ABC affiliate in Orlando is the worst tabloid
news outlet and Ginette must stay away from them) a reporter for them by the name of Kathi
Belich is a real jerk and Ginette should not speak with her at all. In the meantime) my
records document the calls back and forth with Ginette which will be handed to LE within the
next 2 days. Ginette was well received by Fox 35 and WESH 2 in Orlando. Take care and Thank
You for all that you do and have done . .
Dominic

AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAHAAHAAAA! They are ALL scared of Kathi Belich!!
Go Kathi because you are obviously on to the real deal and these people are scared silly of you.
Do your thing Kathi! Do it for Caylee, not us, just Caylee and we'll LOVE you forever!
IMO

 

[drip~drop]

Mark Nejame responds to Cindy's allegations:


She also said she heard NeJame was going to write a book.

Contacted Thursday, NeJame flatly denied he is writing a book about this case.

"There's no plans to write a book and no agreement to write a book," he said, but he added that he would not rule it out in the future.

"Do I think there's a real story that needs to be told here about this case? I absolutely do," he said.

As for the personal attacks cited in Cindy Anthony's letters, NeJame said he wouldn't dignify them with a response. "I'm not going to roll in the mud. My history and my reputation speak for themselves."

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...sey-anthony-evidence-20100805,0,4748539.story

Mark NeJame is one of the 3 or 4 people that I would read his book.

Even if I was offered a Million I wouldn't read anything anthony. It would be a disgrace to Caylee.

 

[countzero]

Ok, my eyes must really be tired. Where is the 8.31.08 CA interview with LE/FBI?????

Anyone ..... thanks

 

[drip~drop]

Ok, my eyes must really be tired. Where is the 8.31.08 CA interview with LE/FBI?????

Anyone ..... thanks

Sorry. My eyes are kinda throbby and numbish at the same time.:loser:

 

[nums24]

Ok, my eyes must really be tired. Where is the 8.31.08 CA interview with LE/FBI?????

Anyone ..... thanks

That we'll have to wait a few days for. Today's release was a partial from 7/22/10. That interview was turned over on 7/29/10.

 

[drip~drop]

That we'll have to wait a few days for. Today's release was a partial from 7/22/10. That interview was turned over on 7/29/10.

Oh good. My eyes are starting to shade over. Enough crazy-read for today.

 

[countzero]

Oh good. My eyes are starting to shade over. Enough crazy-read for today.

You too, lol. I feel as if I was in an alternate universe where everyone was just plain one crayon shy of the box, one rung off the ladder and dipping into the cold medicine (thank you DC, an appropriate description of ginny).

I salute those of you who actually read every page and didn't hit the bottle .... too hard.

 

[RR0004]

You too, lol. I feel as if I was in an alternate universe where everyone was just plain one crayon shy of the box, one rung off the ladder and dipping into the cold medicine (thank you DC, an appropriate description of ginny).

I salute those of you who actually read every page and didn't hit the bottle .... too hard.

So the interview wasn't released (I thought it was from 7/31)?

 

[Nore]

Latent Print Report - Page 10 of the PDF: http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2010/0805/24527641.pdf

---------------

On page 20163,pg.4 of her letter to KC. CA. acknowledges they found Caylee.I thought the ashes weren't hers.:angel:

 

[mitzi]

I give up. I keep getting errors regardless of site used to view PDFs or links on WS to view them...even the links that have broken them up into smaller pieces of the larger doc. I'm so frushtrated. Thanks to those who've offered up rationale for what the problem is.

Just a thought...do you have the latest Adobe reader? IIRC, isn't that what is used to read pdfs?:waitasec:

Edited to add: Just read your post...yup, I have IE too!

 

[mitzi]

Thank you!! I totally missed this!

On a side note, while reading this I came across this, pg 143:

"I really hope the new judge works out. I also thought Judge Strickland was a little biased toward the prosecution."

Bold mine.

Oh, the irony!!!! :dance::dance::dance:

 

[I Din Doot]

You too, lol. I feel as if I was in an alternate universe where everyone was just plain one crayon shy of the box, one rung off the ladder and dipping into the cold medicine (thank you DC, an appropriate description of ginny).

I salute those of you who actually read every page and didn't hit the bottle .... too hard.

I Din Doot (read every page) A few, now I am drimkt 3 much?##