Well, don't you think that's a bias on your part, Lambchop?
I mean, if my grandchild had been living with people in a townhome and then those people all traveled to PR concurrent with my grandchild going missing, I'd be on the first plane over there to maybe speak to those people's families to let them know my grandchild had gone missing, had they seen her, was there some misunderstanding along the way, could my flaky daughter have left my grandchild with any of these friends or asked them to hide her due to a custody dispute, etc. Is it unreasonable for Cindy to have wanted the people who'd been around Caylee investigated? Not at all, IMO. That seems completely routine.
I also get so tired of people saying (just people in general, I don't know if you have done this) that Cindy A supposedly "threw people under the bus", when in reality she had such restraint about making accusations toward any of the young people who had been around Caylee. Most families would have been much more accusatory I think. They would have been yelling for an investigation into these people. For example, RG said much worse things about the A's than Cindy A ever said about anyone in this case, and she's the one who had a missing grandchild. IMO
Red to address.
Amy went to PR on July 8. Others went about the same time, give or take a day.
Caylee went missing June 15 or 16, depending on who you believe.
These events are not concurrent.
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/casey-anthony-murder-trial/timeline-and-discovery/