Yep!! Did ya catch the picture of George and his crew on the SS Caylee Marie "in service"? Wonder how much fish they caught that day?:loser:
I'd bet dollars to donuts that boat sees more fishing trips than it does searches. I'd be willing to bet it's done under the guise of "state of the art search equipment testing" or some such horse hockey.
It is simply unconscionable what the defense and the Anthony "family" have done to Tim and his organization, and it's a double whammy, since the defense is now trying to get access to the volunteers. (Yes they CLAIM they want to ask about the area being underwater, but we all know they will pounce on any opportunity to find a scapegoat, disguised as their responsibility as attorneys).
The Anthonys have helped to drain TES' funds, and have hampered future services and really indirectly damaged those children in need of TES' services. I might understand this if there were something questionable with the searchers, but we know they're not involved, and that Casey killed Caylee.
Now THIS is something I'd love to see addressed as part of "Caylee's law" if that ever materializes. I hope the legislature takes note of the need to rectify this. It's amazing the people we have to share this planet with. Utterly disgusting.
:clap:
I hope a lot of law changes come out of this.
YEP ~ that's them in all of their Glory.
Everytime I see or think of THAT boat, I see George with that
eating grin on his face, like a little boy that finally got the toy that he has always wanted.
Now, for a real belly laugh, go look at their page for becoming a member; rules and regulations and their expectations.
They want you to recruit at least one member a month if you can, and, if you do, you will be rewarded with a $10 VISA gift card ~!!!
http://extremesearchandrescue.com/guidelines.pdf
A few observations here;
*Dues?! Seriously!? Dues?!
* These people being involved with teenage girls who have problems makes me extremely uncomfortable.
*Recruit members and get a reward?! Seriously?! Is this a charitable foundation or Amway?
*Dues?! Seriously?! Dues?!
*IIRC, charitable foundation accounting records have to be made public and I hope the regulatory agencies and just everyday accountants that care go over those documents with a fine tooth comb three times every time they're released.
*Dues?! Seriously?! Dues?!
*Unfortunately if I never came to this board I'd probably believe they were on the up and up. :tsktsk:
*I'd bet a life in hades that these "charities" are not 100% above board. Isn't this the same guy who impersonated a police officer and expected 90% commission on his fund raising from Crimestoppers?
Yes it is;
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crzY4J7yDOE[/ame]
Link
Man Who Runs Kid Finders Gets Physical During Interview
...Eyewitness News has also learned that the president of Crime Stoppers in south Florida had a restraining order against Milstead after he allegedly tried to connive a 90-percent cut of any donations he solicited for the group. At the time, Milstead was operating a business called Gotcha Billboards, but he was reportedly representing himself as an employee of the non-profit Crime Stoppers.
Milstead's Kid Finders Network mentions its intentions to raise funds a number of times, mainly so it says it can build more billboards to report on missing children. Its list of accomplishments does not include finding any missing children.
Eyewitness News obtained Kid Finders Network's tax return for its first year in operation, 2006. It shows the organization borrowed $4,800 from someone to get started. It's listed as an asset and a debt. Kid Finders' 2007 return has not yet been submitted.
Fifteen minutes after Eyewitness News confronted them, Kid Finders packed up their posters and their donation cup and they left....
*I can understand a grieving family being suckered in by these scheisters but after all the facts come out and they are still involved is sickening. Even more so that they let the name of their GD be used on the side of the boat.
*Dues?! Seriously?! Dues?!
*I think that since he ran or runs a billboard company that the money raised will end up in the bank accounts of his company or the company of somebody nefariously related to him. They want to build more billboards, I wonder what company will be utilized for that end and at what profit margin? :waitasec:
That reminds me, just before they were heading out to LA, the Orlando mall sighting was in the news and GA did an interview and he said "We think that child (mall) could be Caylee." And I thought, then why are you going to California? They knew all along that Caylee was dead, IMO.
Why let a good trip be spoiled by the finding of your grand daughter? If she's found while you're gone she can wait til you get back. After all it's been a few months what's a few more days?
I honestly believe that CA wants ICA to hang tough and never ever admit guilt, for the sake of the family image and her own guilty conscience.
If ICA never admits to anything, asis her defiant modus operandi then when inevitably found guilty CA forever has plausible deniability that ICA was framed and there is no proof.
If you remove the word "plausible" I agree with you. (not sarcasm aimed at you.)
If KC did confess, CA would insist that KC was tortured or something which forced her to confess even though she really didn't do it.
By the way, can someone explain to me just what exactly the defense thinks one of the TES searchers might have done? As I'm reading this thread, I'm trying to grasp why the records are vital to the defense anyway. All the searchers are assigned to teams correct? I don't get what they think someone could have done to make them responsible for Caylee being found on Suburban Drive? I don't get what the accusation (that would clear KC) is supposed to be. :waitasec:
I'm clueless as to what this whole issue is even about. I do understand why it would be detrimental to TM's organization to cause all of the searchers' personal info to be made public. I totally get that. What does Jose think one of the searchers may have done that would clear KC?
BBM
They
say they want to question searchers about the water levels during the searches. I
believe they are looking for something in somebodies past they can use to aim the bus at.
Very true. This strategy originated from Macaluso and he was the methods and procedures guy ..... so they attack the credibility of TES organization?
Also, maybe to show there were many independent searches and searchers, although you don't need TES records since it is well documented but why not go after TES (CA requires that) -- trampling over that area (cover for SODDI)?
Makes me think now that CA just wants to embarass TM given her involvement with JB to force MN's hand.
I hope she keeps on trying to embarrass him because it's having the complete opposite effect. I hope that this pub will increase awareness and donations for TES.
*Dues?! Seriously?! Dues?!
