2010.09.25 - Levi's Facebook - Misty questioned again???

[dodie20]

I may be very naive, but I believe that LE knows that both RC and MC both know exactly what happened to Haleigh. Therefore RC gets a plea deal and MC gets an interrogation where they tell her exactly what RC has accused her of. One last chance for her to tell the truth or go down for the murder of little Haleigh. Misty, it's time for you to finally tell the truth!

so, kind of a good cop bad cop scenario? I can see that.

 

[Emeralgem]

I may be very naive, but I believe that LE knows that both RC and MC both know exactly what happened to Haleigh. Therefore RC gets a plea deal and MC gets an interrogation where they tell her exactly what RC has accused her of. One last chance for her to tell the truth or go down for the murder of little Haleigh. Misty, it's time for you to finally tell the truth!

I too believe Misty and Ronald Cummings know exactly what happened to Haleigh, but I also believe Ronald Cummings purposely planned to set up Misty and whoever else he could to keep from ever having to reveal the truth..
Misty can ONLY tell them what happened to Haleigh, she can't tell them where Haleigh is.. Ronald Cummings and his family planned it that way.. Thats WHY we have Crystal saying those people in jail are saying Haleigh is dead, but they can't prove she is dead....
Even IF Misty has told them what happened to Haleigh, I seriously doubt she is capable of telling them where Haleigh's remains are...I can assure you Ronald Cummings and his family would never ever give her or anyone in the Croslin family that information...JMHO

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Whether it's fine tuning loose ends, minor information, or major information, it was new information the prosecution had not been given previously by Mr. Cummings.

I'm unable to imagine any circumstance that would justify withholding ANY information from LE that is relevant to ANY child that is missing, most certainly my own flesh and blood.

Not necessarily. It could just be making sure they have their ducks in a row and have everything right.

It is very common that they go back and reinterview witnesses in older unsolved cases. I don't think anyone believes that LE did not go back and talk to their witnesses again when they were close to the point of arresting Jason Young.

It is no different in this case, imo.

IMO

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I too believe Misty and Ronald Cummings know exactly what happened to Haleigh, but I also believe Ronald Cummings purposely planned to set up Misty and whoever else he could to keep from ever having to reveal the truth..
Misty can ONLY tell them what happened to Haleigh, she can't tell them where Haleigh is.. Ronald Cummings and his family planned it that way.. Thats WHY we have Crystal saying those people in jail are saying Haleigh is dead, but they can't prove she is dead....
Even IF Misty has told them what happened to Haleigh, I seriously doubt she is capable of telling them where Haleigh's remains are...I can assure you Ronald Cummings and his family would never ever give her or anyone in the Croslin family that information...JMHO

Well here is her chance to talk if she knows anything about Ron concerning Haleigh's disappearance because he has sure made it very plain he plans to talk (testify) against anyone involved in Haleigh's disappearance and Misty is very well aware of that.

She does not have to tell them where Haleigh's body is. She has to tell the truth about what happened to Haleigh the night she was removed from her home and by whom.

The body doesn't have to be found for a case to be brought.

IMO

 

[Donjeta]

Well here is her chance to talk if she knows anything about Ron concerning Haleigh's disappearance because he has sure made it very plain he plans to talk (testify) against anyone involved in Haleigh's disappearance and Misty is very well aware of that.

She does not have to tell them where Haleigh's body is. She has to tell the truth about what happened to Haleigh the night she was removed from her home and by whom.

The body doesn't have to be found for a case to be brought.

IMO

BBM

I wonder... how much would Misty's word be worth in court now unless there was corroborating evidence such as a body?

 

[kolokolo]

I can't tell you who LE thinks did what. But I can assure you, and I've heard from many sources that LE has no love loss for Ron, TN, or AS. Absolutely none.

Aloha'oe Levi ...

Im waiting for LE to go get the laundry delivery lady and the wizard of the gang!

Shout Out Misty or forever be the fall girl for the Cummings family.

JMHO

 

[debs]

Hizzhonor: What makes you think she's a witch?
Teresa Neves: She turned me into a newt!
Hizzhonor: A NEWT?
Teresa Neves (meekly) I got better!
Rest of Cummings family: Burn her anyway!!!

 

[justus4all]

Well here is her chance to talk if she knows anything about Ron concerning Haleigh's disappearance because he has sure made it very plain he plans to talk (testify) against anyone involved in Haleigh's disappearance and Misty is very well aware of that.

She does not have to tell them where Haleigh's body is. She has to tell the truth about what happened to Haleigh the night she was removed from her home and by whom.

The body doesn't have to be found for a case to be brought.

IMO

bolded by me..

IMO...If the LE has changed this case from missing to a Homicide...they would have to prove in a trial to a jury ....thru forencis, cornorer, autopsey, DNA, that Haleigh died of of an un natural means...that someone took her little life away...

 

[Crosby87]

Where was Misty's lawyer during the interrogation?

This is what I want to know too? Why did Misty go with LE when they did this to her before and she knows she doesn't have to comply with their request? LE is bluffing Misty and they have nothing to implicate her for HaLeigh's murder so why doesn't she take responsibility and refuse to cooperate with them? I believe Ron took HaLeigh and Misty doesn't know what happened because he is withholding infomation. Everyone knows Ron is withholding information and refused to talk to LE from the get go. Really now, how long would it take Ron to snatch HaLeigh from her bed and throw her in the river at the end of the street and return to the trailer? LE asked Ron what took him so long to get home from work so he could have driven home, done the deed, then drove back to the convenience store to create an alibi for himself. IMO, LE in PC are insane.

 

[debs]

bolded by me..

IMO...If the LE has changed this case from missing to a Homicide...they would have to prove in a trial to a jury ....thru forencis, cornorer, autopsey, DNA, that Haleigh died of of an un natural means...that someone took her little life away...

Not exactly. Given all the stories that have been told, not one of them suggesting Haleigh is alive and well and in the arms of people who love her more than this band of yayhoos ever did, all pointing to a violent end to her young life, they can declare her death as a homicide, means unknown.

Caylee Anthony taught me that.

 

[joeskidbeck]

Thanks, Levi, for the info about Misty's interrogation. This is the first time I've had actual hope in this case from the beginning. I hope they scared her so bad that she will not be able to sleep until she comes out with the truth of what happened that day. I believe whatever happened to Haleigh happened at least 12 hours before the 911 call.

 

[joeskidbeck]

Not exactly. Given all the stories that have been told, not one of them suggesting Haleigh is alive and well and in the arms of people who love her more than this band of yayhoos ever did, all pointing to a violent end to her young life, they can declare her death as a homicide, means unknown.

Caylee Anthony taught me that.

You are right, debs. Theresa and Sam Parker taught me that you don't have to have a body to prove murder these days and she was a grown woman. The defense did their best to prove she left town with a new lover but it didn't work and Sam Parker is in prison for the rest of his life. Plus, last week her body was found and this proved the jury did the right thing!
My utmost prayer in this is that Haleigh will be found and whoever is responsible pays and pays dearly. Actually, I mean everyone who had a hand in hiding what really happened to her should pay dearly!

 

[oceanblueeyes]

bolded by me..

IMO...If the LE has changed this case from missing to a Homicide...they would have to prove in a trial to a jury ....thru Francis, cornorer, autopsy, DNA, that Haleigh died of of an un natural means...that someone took her little life away...

Hi justus4all.

That is not true though. The case is proved BARD by circumstantial evidence just like it is proved in any case where the body is still missing.

In missing body cases there can be no forensics and no body to autopsy yet the defendants are convicted.

It defies logical that Haleigh is alive now or that she died from natural causes. Jurors are asked to use their commonsense and connect the circumstantial evidence links entered into the trial to come to their determination.

And the courts have deemed circumstantial evidence carries as much weight as direct evidence. Sometime even moreso.

IMO

 

[Donjeta]

They can probably prove beyond a reasonable doubt that something bad happened to Haleigh that night and she's no longer alive but finding her might help in proving who did what to her. I really hope Misty can help them with that because it seems that no one else has.

 

[krkrjx]

Where was Misty's lawyer during the interrogation?

Good question. Unless Fields has flown the coop, I find it difficult to believe Misty is being "brutally interrogated" by LE. I have no doubt it is being said, though, by Misty to family and by family to the media.

Misty might have thought LE were being brutes when in fact all they did was inform her of this fact: Misty is facing 50 years in prison and "Baby" will be out in 15.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

BBM

I wonder... how much would Misty's word be worth in court now unless there was corroborating evidence such as a body?

Maybe they have more supporting evidence than any of us realize and that is why they have known all along that Tommy and Misty were not telling the whole truth but just part of it.

If she spills the true beans then maybe now it will line up with what they have uncovered in their investigation all along.

IMO

 

[justus4all]

Maybe they have more supporting evidence than any of us realize and that is why they have known all along that Tommy and Misty were not telling the whole truth but just part of it.

If she spills the true beans then maybe now it will line up with what they have uncovered in their investigation all along.

IMO

Yes I agree...the LE have been very tight lipped and perhaps have more evidence that we are not privledged to know about...

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I can't tell you who LE thinks did what. But I can assure you, and I've heard from many sources that LE has no love loss for Ron, TN, or AS. Absolutely none.

That may be true but this isn't about them. LE doesn't try to solve cases based on their own personal biases toward the victim's family members.

This is about Haleigh and I know that each and every officer that has worked tirelessly on her case wants justice for Haleigh and have no animosity toward an innocent child.

IMO

 

[1Chump]

Ron had to give them something NEW for him to get the deal. And if Ron was sitting on info for a year and half, to me that only means he was involved, otherwise there is no need for him to not tell LE everything he knows from the get-go.

I don't think it is simply Ron agreeing to testify, because he would HAVE to testify if the prosecution called him to the stand in any case, drugs or in any future murder trial.

The only reason Ron could legally get out of testifying would be if he plead the 5th and didn't want to incriminate himself in anything...

So they are not going to give him a deal for simply testifying, because he would have to testify. It has to be more than that. He had to give them something NEW.

I agree with you. But I don't necessarily think it was something "new" that Ron gave them. IMO, they wanted Ron's story to compare with the evidence they have to get Ron. Ron gave a statement under oath without knowing what evidence they do have. That will keep Ron from being able to change his story or tailor his defense to the evidence.

IMO, the fact that they sentenced Ron prior to any testimony says that they are going after Ron. They no longer have anything to hold over Ron to get him to abide by the plea agreement. So all I can think of is they wanted his statement on record knowing that they were never going to need his testimony.

 

[bessie]

I'm not knowledgeable about plea deals but I don't understand why it would have been worth dropping several serious charges to have Ronald agree to testify to something that he had said all along that he had intended to testify about all along.

I agree. If Ronald had provided key information early on there would be no need for the kind of deal he received. Further, the deal was in the works for quite some time. Shoemaker mentioned it months ago. We saw at least one (two, iirc) postponements in Ron's hearings. That tells me working out the deal was complicated and the SA was reluctant to agree to the provisions, but in the end decided whatever Ron has to offer was worth the price of the charge reductions. All indications point to "new" information which might've solved the case if Ron had turned it over prior to January 21, 2010. IMO.