CarolinaMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 5,173
- Reaction score
- 126
One thing I find interesting is that the media doesn't seem to know which two pieces of evidence the motion is addressing. It only said "two items".
The other day WESH saiid it was about hairs as did WKMG today. IIRC, hairs were mentioned at the September 28 hearing in that Casey had to sign stipulations for them.
However, the main DNA testing issue at that hearing concerned touch DNA testing on the shorts and laundry bag. That's what the Orlando Sentinel is reporting right now.
Those who go, please let us know WHICH items are involved, please!
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/25801533/detail.html
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/25824542/detail.html
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-dna-costs-20101117,0,2825941.story
The other day WESH saiid it was about hairs as did WKMG today. IIRC, hairs were mentioned at the September 28 hearing in that Casey had to sign stipulations for them.
However, the main DNA testing issue at that hearing concerned touch DNA testing on the shorts and laundry bag. That's what the Orlando Sentinel is reporting right now.
Those who go, please let us know WHICH items are involved, please!
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/25801533/detail.html
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/25824542/detail.html
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-dna-costs-20101117,0,2825941.story