2010.12.21 Stream of Motions - General Discussion

[ZsaZsa]

http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26838566/detail.html

State says stain in trunk contains biological evidence.

Can you say Adipocere!

 

[kaRN]

Which tells me Baez knows enough technology to vote.

Nums posted the transcript on the news thread. At one point there were more people who voted innocent and the TH's joked that maybe CA was voting multiple times.

 

[Teresa]

And, a toasty welcome aboard to you also ~!!!:welcome4:

Thank you!:great:

Teresa

 

[nums24]

Thank you MuzikMan!!! :loveyou: :blowkiss:

State's Respsonse to Motion To Exclude Stain In Trunk:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674378/20110210-State-Response-to-Motion-to-Exclude-Trunk-Stain

 

[RR0004]

Thank you MuzikMan!!! :loveyou: :blowkiss:

State's Respsonse to Motion To Exclude Stain In Trunk:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674378/20110210-State-Response-to-Motion-to-Exclude-Trunk-Stain

...and not only that...it seems we will be getting some new discovery...including the Mark Hawkins interview!!

 

[LolaMoon08]

...and not only that...it seems we will be getting some new discovery...including the Mark Hawkins interview!!

When? Please say Friday :great:

 

[Intermezzo]

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674378/20110210-State-Response-to-Motion-to-Exclude-Trunk-Stain
Thank You Jeff Ashton

"With all due respect to the inappropriate hyperbole and posturing represented in the Defendant's Motion, the jury will decide if the "imaginary stain" on the trunk carpet exists or not and what the nature of the stain is"

This one is one of my favourites.

"The Defendant contends the evidence should be excluded because "the prejudicial nature of the evidence would seriously impede Miss Anthony's ability to receive a fair trial".
All evidence offered by the State in a criminal case is offered to prejudice the jury against the defendant by making them think she committed a crime...
The Defendant has failed to set forth what "unfair prejudice" they fear"

 

[Intermezzo]

...and not only that...it seems we will be getting some new discovery...including the Mark Hawkins interview!!

really???
Did I miss something? where and when was that said?, please.
Hopefully it will be released very soon.

 

[NoNameLeft]

@Intermezzo: Muzikman posted something about it in the Motion's thread: [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6129420&postcount=210"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - List of Motions **NO DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE**[/ame] :woohoo:

 

[Intermezzo]

Thanks!!

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7167445...e-to-Request-for-Transcription-Services---WLF

Who is William Fitzgerald that the Defense wants the JAC te pay for the overnight expedited transcription of his depo..done on an unknown date?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7167451...Request-for-Transcription-Services---Anthonys
And now the Defense is asking for transcriptions of the Anthony Family Video visitation from July and August 2008

 

[NoNameLeft]

W. Fitzgerald is the custodian of the Texas EquuSearch documents: http://www.wesh.com/r/26805894/detail.html

The visitation transcripts are probably for the upcoming hearing about the 'Agents of the State' Motion.

HTH :seeya:

 

[Lera213]

when is the next hearing?

 

[LolaMoon08]

W. Fitzgerald is the custodian of the Texas EquuSearch documents: http://www.wesh.com/r/26805894/detail.html

The visitation transcripts are probably for the upcoming hearing about the 'Agents of the State' Motion.

HTH :seeya:

Just two weeks before the hearing? And they are requesting them NOW? Why did they wait so long? Hasn't this hearing been scheduled since January... I want to say 3rd?

 

[Aedrys]

Just two weeks before the hearing? And they are requesting them NOW? Why did they wait so long? Hasn't this hearing been scheduled since January... I want to say 3rd?

ITA! But that's Baez for you. He demands a hearing but waits until the last moment to get what he needs for the dang hearing HE requested. Lord.

 

[karengo]

Has anyone else noticed its always easy to tell who has written the motion? I knew it was Jeff Ashton before I got to the bottom. I love reading his motions

 

[NoNameLeft]

when is the next hearing?

March 2 & 3 starting 9:00 AM.

 

[Tiki]

http://www.wesh.com/download/2011/0216/26889138.pdf

Okay - I just tore out some of my hair and I really need to keep what I have left.

JB just filed a motion to strike the State's motion to strike the defense's late witness list.

In it, he says the diary is from 2003 and the state was unable to prove that it was not from 2003.

He also whines a lot about the the state not going to him and asking the reasons for filing the list late. Aren't the reasons supposed to be part of the filing? Why should the state have to go to him and ASK for info he should be including??

Am I missing something? help, please -


.

 

[strawberry]

Has anyone else noticed its always easy to tell who has written the motion? I knew it was Jeff Ashton before I got to the bottom. I love reading his motions

Funny you should say that, I just read JBs motion to strike the motion to strike and I knew right away it was JB that wrote it, not CM.

When I read JAs motions I hear his voice and inflection in my head. :blowkiss:

 

[strawberry]

http://www.wesh.com/download/2011/0216/26889138.pdf

Okay - I just tore out some of my hair and I really need to keep what I have left.

JB just filed a motion to strike the State's motion to strike the defense's late witness list.

In it, he says the diary is from 2003 and the state was unable to prove that it was not from 2003.

He also whines a lot about the the state not going to him and asking the reasons for filing the list late. Aren't the reasons supposed to be part of the filing? Why should the state have to go to him and ASK for info he should be including??

Am I missing something? help, please -


.

You're not alone:crazy: See the Kathy Belich thread.

 

[ohiogirl]

What an a@@hat!