2010.12.30 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence (Plant or Root Growth)

[LCoastMom]

Can someone tell me what this means in laymans terms? I am not following this.ullhair:

I believe it means Dr Hall and his years of experience are in and Dr. Boch (defense plant guru) can say what she will about how long the remains were at the site but how believable is she by comparison.

 

[krisskross]

I so want to read Dr Hall's deposition.

 

[strawberry]

Thank you, strawberry! I was so excited to see all those Orders I had 5 tabs open copying and pasting as fast as my fingers would click. LOL

I will edit both now and link the correct docs.

eta: They're fixed now. :angel:

I figured! Actually, I figured WESH had it wrong but....

 

[Caligram]

The motions required to follow these motions and arrive at a conclusion - just makes my brain hurt. I tell myself, hang on...it's gonna be one hell of a ride come trial day one.

 

[LambChop]

I believe it means Dr Hall and his years of experience are in and Dr. Boch (defense plant guru) can say what she will about how long the remains were at the site but how believable is she by comparison.

If Dr. Boch was happy because they had gotten her name wrong on TV because she was embarrassed by what was said what will she feel like in the courtroom trying to discredit Dr. Hall?