sleutherontheside
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 9,874
- Reaction score
- 4
A little hard to explain, but I guess I would say the 'feel' of the county when I lived there was that jurors from this area would not be too happy with KC. I can only go by what I saw when I lived in PBC. It may have the same demographics as Orlando, but I would not have said that. Upper middle class to upper class population. Lots of retired folks who would have the time to be a juror in this trial. Oh by the way I did not live in the 'snazzy part of town', trust me
the one good thing for JB would be the fact that PBC has a tendency to vote democratic, and Dems are more apt to be anti death penalty (MOO). When I think of PBC I think of wealth - not the kind of people who would look kindly upon whatever story the Defense comes up with. I am speaking for myself here and others may have a completely different picture of PBC, but it would not be somewhere that I would want a jury to come from if I were JB.
The DT fought against a gag order, too. I think it's because they couldn't sell the story with a gag order in place.
ICA gets no sympathy from me!! It was soooo obvious why she started crying when the judge said she comes first!! Bleck!!
Well of course katsclown, the pouty face on ICA was one of self-pity today.
As a former member of the print media, I so want to defend the press and its job of reporting the news. But I won't waste my time.
However, I do disagree when the judge wants to blame the media for the fact ICA might not get a fair trial. The blame also goes to the defense who first asks for a change of venue for jury selection and then becomes readily available for every media outlet that wants an interview. Just this past week, we witnessed JB on In Session in an interview that spanned a couple of days.
JB may not have answered direct questions about the case, but just his appearance alone, talking about his own involvement calls attention to this case in advance of the trial.
The defense and ICA can not have it both ways. They can not complain or fret about the press coverage and yet willingly participate in pre-trial coverage. jmo
Well of course katsclown, the pouty face on ICA was one of self-pity today.
As a former member of the print media, I so want to defend the press and its job of reporting the news. But I won't waste my time.
However, I do disagree when the judge wants to blame the media for the fact ICA might not get a fair trial. The blame also goes to the defense who first asks for a change of venue for jury selection and then becomes readily available for every media outlet that wants an interview. Just this past week, we witnessed JB on In Session in an interview that spanned a couple of days.
JB may not have answered direct questions about the case, but just his appearance alone, talking about his own involvement calls attention to this case in advance of the trial.
The defense and ICA can not have it both ways. They can not complain or fret about the press coverage and yet willingly participate in pre-trial coverage. jmo
How come Baez was allowed to put on a special about the case two weeks ago, w/o a word mentined by the judge? He's says he's adament about ICA getting a fair trial but let that one slide...
That's what I would like answered.
Plus his interview with InSessions. No comment was made about that.
If the SA did something like that he (JB) would be incandescant with rage.
Fair trial? Where's the fairness for a little girl.
I don't think the judge was talking about either side, he was simply talking about the media coverage.
Well of course katsclown, the pouty face on ICA was one of self-pity today.
As a former member of the print media, I so want to defend the press and its job of reporting the news. But I won't waste my time.
However, I do disagree when the judge wants to blame the media for the fact ICA might not get a fair trial. The blame also goes to the defense who first asks for a change of venue for jury selection and then becomes readily available for every media outlet that wants an interview. Just this past week, we witnessed JB on In Session in an interview that spanned a couple of days.
JB may not have answered direct questions about the case, but just his appearance alone, talking about his own involvement calls attention to this case in advance of the trial.
The defense and ICA can not have it both ways. They can not complain or fret about the press coverage and yet willingly participate in pre-trial coverage. jmo
That's my point- if he is concerned about excessive coverage of this case then he should include JB ... he was irritated about the fact that local media have all accumulated Legal Analysts ( Sheaffer, NeJame and Judge Eaton) but lets slide all the defense team appearances on any local/national outlet they can get onto.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...-trial-hearing-media-20110502,0,2843017.story
Robin Smythe, general manager of Central Florida News 13, said Monday, "We are intending to" appeal Perry's order, but said she does not fear it will cause a delay in the start of the trial next week.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.