2011.05.10 - Jury Selection Day Two

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,461
This will be interesting....
 
  • #1,462
HHJP: this has to be a typo. post mortum hair banding. dr. vass did not testify about hair banding. this deal with his opinion and I did not leap to a conclusion. As you pointed out there were certain things.

miss fry: dr vass was basing his opinion on his research. I don't answer questions but I will indulge you on this one. he said the can smelled like a decomposing body. as stropopulous said: human being through out time have known the smell of decompostion. all human being have sight, smell and taste...house wives can smell when meat decays. the good dr can open a can and say he smelled that odor before. just like other folks.

lady: this is related to research and the findings he has found in this case. we ask for a hearing...related to his novel research and his conclusions. two elements for frye are lacking. lack of impartial testimony second no finding of reliability in dr. vass...

HHJP: you have my order?

just a moment.

HHJP: yes.
 
  • #1,463
Who is this???????
 
  • #1,464
Is she about to get a smak down?
 
  • #1,465
This has to be a typo....... HHJP

OMG.....they filed a motion about Dr. Vass dealing with hair banding.

OMG is it!
JB should borrow a neuron from CM then he'd at least have two to think with...
I think this is the kind of stuff ICA is probably writing down in preparation for her malpractice suit after this trial is over.
 
  • #1,466
Didn't Judge Perry already DENY the request for re-hearing a little while ago? And now she is asking again? :waitasec:
 
  • #1,467
i honestly don't understand how they expect people NOT to talk about it....it would be so natural to touch on the one thing you all have in common as you sit there. its almost like they should sequester the jurors from each other as well the outside world.
 
  • #1,468
  • #1,469
Turn to page 21 and read...

maybe that will give you some guidance.

I am about to pizz my pants.
 
  • #1,470
Is this Ms. Fry, or am I confused?
 
  • #1,471
I hope HHJP eats this chick alive.
 
  • #1,472
HHJP turn to page 221 of the order, read berry vs. cxxx transportation. maybe that will give you some guidance.

I am familiar with that case. different factors. it says there were several experts that played into the findings of the court. (she speaks too quickly).

here as far as independent articles go there was simply one.
 
  • #1,473
KC was obviously distressed...
ICA34.jpg


ICA35.jpg


ICA36.jpg
 
  • #1,474
Judge is still grinning and teaching, lol! :) :)
 
  • #1,475
  • #1,476
Hey - I'd be upset if I found out 50 prospective jurors were sitting around waiting for their turn talking about how guilty they think I am ......:great:

:great: :floorlaugh::floorlaugh: Yep ...

:waitasec: ... or ... do you think she is "unhappy" about her little "spat" with JB ? ?
 
  • #1,477
  • #1,478
The defense has a new attorney??
 
  • #1,479
Instrumentality?
 
  • #1,480
Are they online reading this site? What a bunch of no-life-loser-lawyers :great:

I'm positive they read this site!

At least they know what we think about them...:great:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
94
Guests online
2,682
Total visitors
2,776

Forum statistics

Threads
632,543
Messages
18,628,255
Members
243,192
Latest member
Mcornillie5484
Back
Top