2011.05.13 - Jury Selection DAY FIVE Afternoon Session

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm shocked at how many of these pj's don't pay attention to news! Maybe I am a new junkie I suppose.

I rarely paid attention to news (except locally, when it involved a kid) until 9/11.

After that - it's about all I watch. One has to know what's going on in the world.

I chalk it up to old age, lol.
 
The sound got too low. But I think the State doesn't want her-citing that she doesn't like judging others.
 
HHJP: and that is your only reason?

JA: no but its the best one. she had other responses.

HHJP: anything from defense?

CM: no

HHJP: his mic is not on
 
Is it me...or does CM sometimes sound as if he has marbles in his mouth?

PS- the last juror, could hang a jury.
 
Wow, people have totally opposite opinions on this juror...

I don't like her. I think forensic evidence would be way over her head. I also think that she won't give expert testimony weight over a regular citizen witness. Me personally would give somebody like Yuri more weight than the Anthony family.
 
I'm not sure this juror can keep up with the volume of information at this trial.

I agree. I think she will have a hard time with the forensics. I hope she can follow it, but she seems easily confused. imoo

OH- STATE is going to challenge
 
OMG....CM and the race card! :banghead::banghead:
 
I have to agree with the State here, I think she would be the type to go easy on ICA looking for the good in every one JMO
 
Wow...I did not know a judge could refuse a peremptory strike...
 
State uses its preemptary ? challenge
DT objects because women is an african american
HHJP is not allowing state to use its challenge as other jurors answered oddly, and once question was clarified, pj answered acceptably.
 
HHJP is going to deny the SA's challenge - will have to use a strike and I wish the judge would use his mike.
 
HHJP: sitting in judgement is the ground stated. but she said once she got the evidence she could. many people have misunderstood. Mr. Baez asked about LE and told them they should be treated like everyone else, he was there. Fl supreme court consider all of those factors and her questioning was not that indepth. this juror was only given a short period of time. I find that to be...

JA: is the court finding that my case is not genuine. I will not argue with you bring the juror back in.
 
State exercised a pre-emptory challenge.

CM brings up her race!!!!

HHJP says it is clear she is African American.

Your Honor...may I apologize (because I know the DT never will) for a jurors race being bandied about like a sound bite with no regard for relativity to the case and demonstrative of clear racial preferences by the DT.
 
Wow, I thought a peremptory challenge did not have to be backed up by cause. I had no idea this could happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
205
Guests online
731
Total visitors
936

Forum statistics

Threads
625,925
Messages
18,514,425
Members
240,886
Latest member
chgreber
Back
Top