sleutherontheside
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 9,874
- Reaction score
- 4
Any other lawyers on her right now? I want their opinions on this last lady. My long-term confidence about this case is now wavering.
An an attorney, I see this last lady as the one who could lead to a mistrial.
When people do not understand something, they will discount it when making a decision. She will like CM's folksy manner. She will like JB and the way he calls her "Miss." She will think casey looks too young and sweet to have murdered her kid.
Now I'm really worried. I would have done everything I could to make sure she's not on the jury. Oh boy.
She seems like a very nice lady, but I agree she would probably not make a good juror. I hope the State can bump her out.Clearly the state was not prepared to elaborate as to why they wanted her gone, so I believe they were using a p. strike, and did not think they would need to explain. So my question is, can a judge disallow a p. strike and if so, can the state try again with this juror, as long as they have a better prepared reason? Or is judge sold on this one?
Oh man, this is messed up... will the state have another chance to strike this woman (the religious one who doesn't like to judge) or is she pretty much gonna be on the jury, now? This is bad for the state, IMO. She is not going to want to level the DP, IMO.
ah - seems RB got a little talking to about having that laptop screen within ICA's view - notice how she kept holding it way up in the air? Then she moved. ha ha
I disagree. The State tried to use their strike. The strike request has been denied.
Any reason except Race, Religion, Sex
...and it's making me physically ill.Me either Gitana. Me either. That's scary. And for the first time since this case started I'm worried the DT will get their hung jury.
I think the lady will just follow along with the majority actually so it may prove well for the state in the end.
Each side has 10 strikes they can use without cause.
Yup Mosby. You noticed that too. This is bad. This process is SO damn important folks. The DT is searching and hoping for that one person who isn't into details, has no children, and who isn't comfortable judging others. They just need one to sit on that jury and they're home free. The DT is looking to keep her from death or get a hung jury. That's their plan.
Can someone please explain to me why Baez is so hellbent on having African Americans on the jury? It's not like the felon is black. Is it just because they are minorities and he is a minority?
I just don't get it... maybe I'm just slow.
It wasn't!!!!!!!!!!!!She is on the jury unless the State can convince HHJP that their decision was not about the race of the juror.
I am an attorney and am shaking in my shoes. She, IMO, a classic wildcard who could hang the jury or, at best, cause a lot of frustration and discord. I would have done a WHOLE lot more to get her off the panel. But I also can't think what arguments are being made at sidebar? any idea what you could say at this point to the court? Are they trying to bring her back? I don't think that would help remove the taint.