Bringing over from last thread:
No. She is on. JA tried to use his peremptory or strike without case, it was objected to and sustained which I have NEVER seen before. She is the first juror we know is on the panel, as far as I am concerned. JA failed to question her more or use a challenge for cause first which was a big mistake. They are talking about this on the news.
Wrong.
They did try to strike without case and it was objected to and sustained.
Already did. It did not work.
Nope.
I pray you are right!!!!!!!!! But my lawyer instinct is very concerned. I feel a tiny bit sick.
The first ones to be seated are the ones on the main jury. Then, they select alternates.
You are right.