Defense counsel Lisabeth Fryer files a motion to contest the method of jury selection Wednesday.
Although it is unlikely it seems much more likely then most of the theories going around atm (if that makes sense).
The only four things that spring to mind: Plea deals are never off the table so to speak, so although the SA can remove an offer at the start of the trial there is always a possibility of re-instating it if the defense asks. Indeed, it is possible to make a agreement/"plea deal" after conviction in many US jurisdictions (if not all).
Secondly, it would be interesting if ICA was wanting to plead out since it is quite inconsistent with the sociopathy that people have suggested previously. Although, saying that, I suppose there was always a possibility for her to face reality and save herself.
Thirdly, there is no reason for JB to come off the case just because she is pleading guilty. Indeed, I view it as poor practice and unethical so to do. If the Client has admitted guilt and wants to plead guilty then she is quite entitled to do so.
Fourthly, I am unsure if there was anything to indicate that DP was likely. Although, perhaps the DT thought that it was a toss up between LWOP and DP and nothing else was going to happen.
But all in all a realistic possibility.
I really don't think there's any way it's a plea deal:
A) To me, JP saying, "Did you have a chance to explain the matter to ICA" rules that out. This tells me that something happened that Mason had to explain to ICA.
I think it's some personal business of JB's, maybe even a family emergency, and since he's lead council, they are going to hold up for him.
B) I cannot believe that she would EVER in a million years agree to a plea deal because that would mean confessing. She will NEVER do that. EVER. Heaven forfend she'll lose the chance to ruin what's left of her parents' and brother's lives.
I really think JB needed to be out for personal reasons.
They will resume tomorrow and have Thursday, Friday, and Saturday to get the Jury and alternates.
The trial will start Monday, just as JP said.
The defense has called that a piecemeal approach, contending it violates Anthony's due process rights.
Perry denied the objection from the defense, saying he had gone above and beyond to give both sides ample opportunity to select a fair and impartial jury.
Is this the motion from this morning, or a new one?!!?!?!
on the replay watch the Judges eyes very closely right after he stated the court will be in recess until tomorrow moring.
http://www.wftv.com/video/27938803/index.html
This is WFTV's raw video from the break before the state struck the last PJ, I believe. ICA is obviously anxious about something. Wish I could read lips, but I could swear at one point she looks around and says "where is he" and then a little later, "someone find him". I believe this was the short break taken before the lunch break when JB asked for 15 more minutes to be added to the lunch break.
I am unsure if this is correct. I have known attorneys to file to withdraw because of the client being unable to continue paying for their services.
I think a new one. Posted at 2:08pm today
So there was nothing different in his behavior? He didn't seem ill?If JB was/is sick - this isn't the same JB who said an hour earlier "well, we better get down to work then". He said this to the judge at the podium! Then he leaves the courtroom and doesn't come back?
Nope - not buying it.
MOO
Mel
Is this the motion from this morning, or a new one?!!?!?!