2011.06.02 TRIAL Day Eight (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #741
No he does NOT. He had plenty of time to view this video and object prior to it being shown in court. He didn't object then, or if he did it was overruled, he can't get a mistrial on it now.

End of story.

A thank you was not enough. . .Perfectly stated post. . .:rocker:
 
  • #742
Baez talking about his "feelings" and such. He's had the videos for over 2 YEARS according to him.
 
  • #743
Anyone who ever watched any coverage of this case knew these tapes were, uh, let's say 'not good' for the Defense. I would say there's no excuse for not filing.
 
  • #744
As well as the ones that are forthcoming... So he HAS viewed them and knows what's in them and could have brought it to attention a long time ago.

Oh,
He got them in Sept 2008

Nuff said.
 
  • #745
Were John Allen or Abbie Wells witnesses today?
 
  • #746
BAEZ - you had time to do interviews and do 48 HOURS, you could have taken that time and filed a motion. LOSE. Move on.
 
  • #747
  • #748
Jose totally knew this could/would happen, that's why there were no visits for 2 1/2 years!!
 
  • #749
A jailhouse video released three weeks ago?? I thought that was disclosed over a year ago?

OH! LDB clears it up. He got a duplicate copy of it.
 
  • #750
Denied again.
 
  • #751
Motion for mistrial De-nied. :gavel:

Now let's move on!
 
  • #752
JB has had these videos since Sept. 2008. The exception is one he got three weeks ago.
 
  • #753
Baez asks for a mistrial.
HHJP: :denied:
 
  • #754
September 2008. Well then again I say, carry on. Just as was said yesterday you've had two years JB to place your motions. attorneys are always procrastinating because I work for one and have worked for many but you don't procratinate in a trial of this magnitude JB.
 
  • #755
motion denied for mistrial
 
  • #756
Denied. Thank you, Judge.
 
  • #757
Judge checking and double-checking everything... especially time deadlines. DENIED!
 
  • #758
They really are desperate aren't they....
 
  • #759
He certainly addressed that stupid Jib-Jab video on time, but other matters kept him from addressing the visitation videos? Okay.
 
  • #760
State reply: LDB questioning the 403 objection today. No specificity. Untimely. Tapes already admitted.

HHBP question: Deadline to address evidentiary issue - 12/31/10? LDB - yes.

HHBP question: Anything in the motions to redact portions of the videos? LDB - no - and no inquiries.

HHBP - Defense response to the two questions?

JB agrees, but feels it's his duty to raise objections when appropriate. Raised objection before and during video as well as now.

HHBP - when were videos provided to Defense? JB - 9/08 and 09. All but one provided three weeks ago.

HHBP - time deadlines can sometimes be harsh. There must be some finality. This court gave the date of 12/31/10 and from Jan to April the court was available for hearings.

Motion for Mistrial DENIED.

JB's motion is untimely. Renewed motions denied.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
1,356
Total visitors
1,416

Forum statistics

Threads
632,332
Messages
18,624,869
Members
243,095
Latest member
Lillyflowerxx
Back
Top